Dockery signed before JJHow did we have Sean then JJ walked in? They were the same class lol
Sean was a huge scorer coming out of Chicago. The Dockery family thought he would be the sg because Ewing and Duhon were already here.And Sean wasn't a scorer...and who in their right mind wouldn't want JJ over Sean
Did Sean sign before Shelden. OFC
Dockery signed before JJ
Sean was a huge scorer coming out of Chicago. The Dockery family thought he would be the sg because Ewing and Duhon were already here.
JJ committed to Duke as a sophomore. You're wrong.
This isn't worth the bickering and difference of options especially with the great posters we got on this board.
So was JJ...saw him numerous times in HS and knew he would be special
I don't see how Sean was a great scorer in HS after watching him at duke...guess he shot a bunch or something cause I didn't see it in college
Does anyone remember when Laettner committed. Did he commit before Brian Davis or after. For the life of me I don't recall. Same thing with Grant Hill and Tony Lang. It's tough getting old when you can't remember stuff like that.OFC
It's been a while but I think Grant Luke JJ committed early...maybe not as early as JJ but not sure
We're all Duke fans in the end and we're all gonna have different opinions. Could you imagine if everyone didn't have a difference.You're going to let your fan club down with comments like this.
We're all Duke fans in the end and we're all gonna have different opinions. Could you imagine if everyone didn't have a difference.
Don't mean I don't believe in what I said but a difference in opinion isn't worth arguing about.
Like I said, Jeter weren't the first he won't be the last.
True and I get this but some do get carried away.Disagreements are part of the fun. Some can handle them, some can't and some get desperate.
True and I get this but some do get carried away.
My point, I probably should have stated it better is,
K and staff recruited the kids and when they commit at some point all were on the same page on what was expected somewhere it got lost between both parties involved.
I see the recourse when people say," so it's k's fault that player A never developed!" But there is some truth to that because isn't that part of a recruiting pitch, especially for all you coaches on here? How a coach plans to teach and develope the player and utilize his skill in his program?
Then there is the most famous line," time is earned in practice." Well I can see that from some views but Duke must have had five people who weren't just doing anything in practice, because they didn't play in games.
That's how I see it going both ways same on the staff as on the players.
Didn't work with Seventh Woods. Many times it's about the player, not the coaching.Shows what playing a guy through struggles can do
Well I'll take that as saying Duke had five " seventh woods"Andre Sweet.
Didn't work with Seventh Woods. Many times it's about the player, not the coaching.
Lol...here we go again about another player..F pg berry enough saidAndre Sweet.
Didn't work with Seventh Woods. Many times it's about the player, not the coaching.
True and I get this but some do get carried away.
My point, I probably should have stated it better is,
K and staff recruited the kids and when they commit at some point all were on the same page on what was expected somewhere it got lost between both parties involved.
I see the recourse when people say," so it's k's fault that player A never developed!" But there is some truth to that because isn't that part of a recruiting pitch, especially for all you coaches on here? How a coach plans to teach and develope the player and utilize his skill in his program?
Then there is the most famous line," time is earned in practice." Well I can see that from some views but Duke must have had five people who weren't just doing anything in practice, because they didn't play in games.
That's how I see it going both ways same on the staff as on the players.
We agree, that's why I put it on both.Few situations are one in the same. That's my point. Yes, K must take some of the blame. So must the player.
K has historically played a shorter rotation. It frustrates many of us. We can break it down all we want....it's not changing anything. This season was the first in some time where I thought the rotation would be more than seven guys. Was it because K was stubborn? Was it because he felt certain guys shouldn't play? Was it because some players put themselves in front of the program? None of us know those answers. We can pretend we do, but that's all we're doing.
We have spoken about this before, you and I and I didn't agree at first if you recall because he couldn't stay on the floor due to freshman fouls or silly fouls. But I agree it would have helped especially with the heavy minutes played by the guards.I believe if Jackson had been the PG from day 1 wed still be in this
He did have foul trouble early onWe have spoken about this before, you and I and I didn't agree at first if you recall because he couldn't stay on the floor due to freshman fouls or silly fouls. But I agree it would have helped especially with the heavy minutes played by the guards.
Not saying franks preferred position is pg ..I'd rather have him off ball but this season we needed him