... but Trump's daddy was just as big a POS as lying Donnie. You'd think Trump's fan club would've had honest parents to teach them the golden rule too. It's pretty obvious they didn't. A man's word means nothing to a Trump fan.
Donald Trump’s administration will soon appeal a court ruling that blocked a revised travel ban, White House spokesman Sean Spicer said. But the appeal might carry risks as Trump’s own words could come back to haunt him in court.
A federal judge in Hawaii on Wednesday halted Trump’s new travel ban hours before it was scheduled to take effect, dealing him a major setback on one of his top policy initiatives. A Maryland judge followed hours later.
Some lawyers and legal scholars said Trump essentially admitted on live television that he’d rather have a travel ban that gave preference to Christian minorities and blocked many Muslims who had a right to enter the U.S. on valid visas -- provisions that prompted judges to block the original Jan. 27 executive order. The March 6 revisions were supposed to address those legal flaws.
Lawyers might argue that the president’s words "reinforce his real motive" in drafting the new ban, said Stephen Wasby, a legal scholar at the State University of New York in Albany.
"He said he wanted to go back to the original executive order, which was even more blatant in its religious discrimination than the revised one," Wasby said. "Whether he likes it or not, his words will have consequences in court."
https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/...emarks-on-new-travel-ban-ruling-may-haunt-him
Donald Trump’s administration will soon appeal a court ruling that blocked a revised travel ban, White House spokesman Sean Spicer said. But the appeal might carry risks as Trump’s own words could come back to haunt him in court.
A federal judge in Hawaii on Wednesday halted Trump’s new travel ban hours before it was scheduled to take effect, dealing him a major setback on one of his top policy initiatives. A Maryland judge followed hours later.
Some lawyers and legal scholars said Trump essentially admitted on live television that he’d rather have a travel ban that gave preference to Christian minorities and blocked many Muslims who had a right to enter the U.S. on valid visas -- provisions that prompted judges to block the original Jan. 27 executive order. The March 6 revisions were supposed to address those legal flaws.
Lawyers might argue that the president’s words "reinforce his real motive" in drafting the new ban, said Stephen Wasby, a legal scholar at the State University of New York in Albany.
"He said he wanted to go back to the original executive order, which was even more blatant in its religious discrimination than the revised one," Wasby said. "Whether he likes it or not, his words will have consequences in court."
https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/...emarks-on-new-travel-ban-ruling-may-haunt-him