looks like Hillary broke the law.
http://thefederalist.com/2015/09/01...nd-distributed-highly-classified-information/
http://thefederalist.com/2015/09/01...nd-distributed-highly-classified-information/
Uh oh! This latest traunch of emails contains a blockbuster
- Thread starter WVPATX
- Start date
Even more:
Cooper, who found this nugget:
On July 25, 2010, Clinton sent an email to Special Envoy for Middle East Peace George Mitchell. The subject line read “Here’s my personal email,” and only had a short message: “[Please] use this for reply– HRC.”
Mitchell emailed her back two hours later. “I talked with [Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini] again and went over the point again. He said he understands and agrees,” he began. The rest of the email is blanked out, indicating that the State Department team releasing Clinton’s emails recognized that the information it contained was classified.
She directed George Mitchell to send a report on a diplomatic effort involving the Middle East to her personal e-mail. This is “knowingly,” as Cooper points out in a following tweet.
Cooper, who found this nugget:
On July 25, 2010, Clinton sent an email to Special Envoy for Middle East Peace George Mitchell. The subject line read “Here’s my personal email,” and only had a short message: “[Please] use this for reply– HRC.”
Mitchell emailed her back two hours later. “I talked with [Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini] again and went over the point again. He said he understands and agrees,” he began. The rest of the email is blanked out, indicating that the State Department team releasing Clinton’s emails recognized that the information it contained was classified.
She directed George Mitchell to send a report on a diplomatic effort involving the Middle East to her personal e-mail. This is “knowingly,” as Cooper points out in a following tweet.
Nice try
this July 2010 e-mail, for example, the entirety of Hillary Clinton’s message was redacted prior to its public release under the federal FOIA law. The redactions of the material were provided pursuant to a provision of law protecting national security information. The printed redaction code “1.4(D),” cited next to the redaction and at the top of the document next to the official classification date, pertains to information on “[f]oreign relations or foreign activities of the United States, including confidential sources[.]” At the top of the document, a declassification date of July 1, 2025 is clearly noted:
That declassification date is highly significant because it is precisely 15 years after the date on which the e-mail was sent, rather than the date on which it was marked.
That is because under federal law, information is classified by nature, not by marking. As a result, federal classification authorities deemed that the information was classified the very second it originated, even if it was not marked as such until August 27, 2015. Also worthy of note is the fact that Hillary’s message is the only content in the entire document that is redacted and marked as classified. This means that she was not merely a helpless, passive recipient of classified national security information; she was the originator. And not only did she intentionally originate the classified information, she intentionally disseminated it via an unsecured, unsanctioned private e-mail server.
The e-mail was classified as “confidential.” According to the 2009 Obama executive order, the “confidential” classification level “shall be applied to information, the unauthorized disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause damage to the national security.”
Bullsh*t. Look at the "classified by" date -- 08/27/2015. Last week, not five years ago.Nice try
this July 2010 e-mail, for example, the entirety of Hillary Clinton’s message was redacted prior to its public release under the federal FOIA law. The redactions of the material were provided pursuant to a provision of law protecting national security information. The printed redaction code “1.4(D),” cited next to the redaction and at the top of the document next to the official classification date, pertains to information on “[f]oreign relations or foreign activities of the United States, including confidential sources[.]” At the top of the document, a declassification date of July 1, 2025 is clearly noted:
That declassification date is highly significant because it is precisely 15 years after the date on which the e-mail was sent, rather than the date on which it was marked.
That is because under federal law, information is classified by nature, not by marking. As a result, federal classification authorities deemed that the information was classified the very second it originated, even if it was not marked as such until August 27, 2015. Also worthy of note is the fact that Hillary’s message is the only content in the entire document that is redacted and marked as classified. This means that she was not merely a helpless, passive recipient of classified national security information; she was the originator. And not only did she intentionally originate the classified information, she intentionally disseminated it via an unsecured, unsanctioned private e-mail server.
The e-mail was classified as “confidential.” According to the 2009 Obama executive order, the “confidential” classification level “shall be applied to information, the unauthorized disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause damage to the national security.”
Like the writer said, this information is classified the moment it was sent. Look at the declassification date which is exactly 15 years after the memo was sent.
You're wasting your breath. These morons don't have an IQ high enough to comprehend the simple meaning of your post and mine in another thread. They've reached a conclusion and they'll keep trying to connect the dots to get there, whether it's possible or not.
If hillarys camp told you she had a foot long dick you would get a throat extension. You will believe any line of bs they put out.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/31/politics/hillary-clinton-classified-emails/index.html
"That's despite 125 of those emails -- which weren't classified at the time -- being retroactively classified before they were released." There it is for you dumb dave in simple English. By the way, I'm not even a Hillary fan. I'm being subjective. When the DOJ says they are charging her, then I'll believe she broke the law. I know that's a hard concept for you.
Well it said so in print so it must be true. Do yourself a favor and stop talking about IQ for your own sake kid.
My apologies. I assumed you are a college kid because grown ups dont usually brag about their intelligenence while proving their lack of it with every thought.
To be fair, you have on more than one occasion proven to be speaking about stuff waaaaaay out of your depth of knowledge.