You would think. Personally I don’t mind this new system. I just wish they would reduce the rounds and go back to subdividing at least in 1A and 4A to equal our the enrollment disparityHe wrote....
"Sadly it is also possible that there are schools who have no idea this is coming, because their Athletic Director and or their football coach doesn’t pay attention to the NCHSAA."
Isn't that part of their job especially the athletic director?
Not terrible, I would like to see a couple small tweaks. There should be a small benefit to playing up a classification even if you lose. Also I am not crazy about teams that don’t win conference outright seeded with outright winners. I understand they are at a disadvantage playing 2a teams but still don’t like the idea of them being seeded above the outright conference champs. Now I am fine with the being seeded after champs and before any 2nd place teams. This should still give them 1 maybe 2 home playoff games.You would think. Personally I don’t mind this new system. I just wish they would reduce the rounds and go back to subdividing at least in 1A and 4A to equal our the enrollment disparity
It doesn’t suck there is some tweaking they could do. Would you prefer the old bracket style? To me that sucked because you played the same teams for three rounds before playing anyone else.This system sucks.
If you lose to a 4a by 3 it's the same as losing by 30 to same 4a school
Agree with that. Then you still have the charters which is creating an entirely different messOnly divide 1a and 4a.
Leave 2a and 3a along.
That would be six.
Since Adams and Strunk left the NCHSAA has progressively gotten worse and worse on an annual basis, and that includes shirking responsibilities due to utter laziness, not just incompetence. Ridding of subdivisions is a prime example, including the way they got it done.Here's something that seems odd to me. NCHSAA realize on MaxPreps to report scores to them so they can do the RPI rating ( assuming they do it and not MaxPreps) and MaxPreps realize on the scores to be reported to them which is why RPI keep changing for a few days because some games aren't reported quickly.
But the thing is MaxPreps employees 65 people keeping up with every sport in every state. NCHSAA according to LinkedIn employee's 197 and they just have North Carolina so why can't they keep up with the scores themselves?
for a split conference: to be seeded as a conference champion a team must finish 1,2,3 overall in conference and/or have a .500 overall win percentage. If neither of those happens highest finishing team in a given classification is seeded as a wild card.Wish he had mention the issue of split conferences wether or not a team has to win the overall conference or just their classification to be seated with the overall conference champions. I was thinking you had to win the whole thing but I looked back at the old rules when still using MaxPreps and they just had to win their classification so I guess that's how it still is.
NCHSAA in their rules haven't been very clear on some of this they released a form on just the playoffs seeding which states that conference champions are seated first based on their RPI then everyone else but theie handbook states it like he does seating the second place teams in 7+ conference after them.
Highschool OT states...
"Reminder: second-place teams are seeded amongst the wild-cards. The only difference between these teams and the wild-cards is that their spot is automatic even if they have one of the lower RPI scores."
Yeah I've read that even posted it, they also have a separate playoffs rules releasefor a split conference: to be seeded as a conference champion a team must finish 1,2,3 overall in conference and/or have a .500 overall win percentage. If neither of those happens highest finishing team in a given classification is seeded as a wild card.