Updated: Week 4 AP & Coaches Polls
- Thread starter RyanSnyder
- Start date
Immoral losses don’t you mean? The program should be cast into hell for its playing field transgressions
The only poll that matters is the one that comes out after conference championship weekend.
I was referring to the post that said the only rankings that matter is the last one…which isn’t true. Beating ranked teams throughout the season helps you…losing to a ranked team is better for you than losing to an unranked team….right or wrong, all rankings matter including the preseason rankings.
Will the Eagles go 20-0? If not, then do you admit that Hurts isn’t a good enough QB?
The goal isn't to be perfect
You're proving my point exactly. People want perfection which isn't realistic
QBs have lost many games that were and weren't their faults. He's good enough to win a title. Anyone that doesn't see that is wasting their time watching the sport. Doesn't mean he will win one...he's simply capable of it.
Honestly, pros is 100% diff (for me). I never compare the 2 sports. I also enjoy the birds more than State, probably because I watch the games in the Philly bars, it’s fantastic fun, the city of love shows its love like no other, even State on game day.
and hurts is good enough (just facts bro)
as for 15, he’s 0-3 v OSU, O and Notre Dame last year. Hurts went 3-0 on the sb run.
Completely irrefutable point so it’s dumb.
Common sense says he’d have to beat AT LEAST 2 big boys to get the natty. If he were 500 v bb at this point, I’d agree. But body of work (0-9 v big boys) shows “he’s good enough to win a natty” is not true. No, he’s not.
Took at you knowing your comment was wrong so you had to alter your statement. No past performance doesn't dictate future success nor is a QB solely judged based on record.
Wut? I’m simply pointed out he’s never beaten a big boy and it’s unaware to say he can win a natty cause a he looks like asss v the 1 aa comp so far and b he’s 0-10 v big boys so what up?
”I know he can do it”. How can you possibly believe that?
You do have to give Allar credit for pushing the boundries of critical thinking for some fans...he's 26-6 as a starting QB, but now he's 0-10 in games against "big boys".
A bowl game against 11th ranked Ole Miss when half the team opts out is a "big boy" (let me guess where it would be categorized if we had won), yet playoff games against top 10 teams aren't "big boys" (again, let me guess where they would be categorized if we had lost).
A bowl game against 11th ranked Ole Miss when half the team opts out is a "big boy" (let me guess where it would be categorized if we had won), yet playoff games against top 10 teams aren't "big boys" (again, let me guess where they would be categorized if we had lost).
Don’t be daft. Examples of big boys include Michigan, Ohio state, Oregon etc. Since you know there’s 6 losses, post up the teams. Then post up the non fish teams he beat (the group of 26)
‘and bowls don’t count cause big boys prep for the draft.
Didnt Michigan beat 15 50-9 2 years ago? That was fun
They’ll say it. I won’t believe it. Then they’ll make a run to the semis and I’ll be dead wrong. The same thing will happen to some team next year, I’ll say they’re trash and they’ll also prove me wrong. It’s CFB.Wait until notre dame and perhaps Clemson run the table with their schedule. Media will say, this notre dame team is not the same one in September.
You can't be this lost--you came back to my response saying we don't need to beat both Oregon and Ohio State saying "Soooo, 15s not good enough" proving you need perfection.