Using Chrome with the Catpaws

funKYcat75

Well-known member
Apr 10, 2008
32,252
14,815
112
So the Chrome app got an update and it's screwed up stuff with the board. When I click a thread title or even the 'last unread' button, it doesn't go to the first new post. It's like it is ignoring the # in the URL.

Any clues for fixin' if anyone has dug into it?

Here's a bouncy pic for your trouble.

 

Crushgroove

New member
Oct 11, 2014
7,331
1,961
0
People still use Chrome? Chrome's 5 minutes of fame were up 2 years ago. Get rid of that memory hog that refuses to play well with others and has the most archaic favorites menu evar.
 

funKYcat75

Well-known member
Apr 10, 2008
32,252
14,815
112
I am talking about on iPad, where I spend most of my day. Sorry. Should have specified.
 

TheEgyptianMagician

New member
May 6, 2004
11,348
406
0
I don't have the issue i guess b/c mine isn't updated, but I'd try clearing the cache/cookies if you havent already. Then there is the preload webpage to save bandwidth feature, maybe try turning that off.

if that doesn' work, you maybe have an older version of the app on your computer in itunes. could try to uninstall and reinstall the older one.
 

funKYcat75

Well-known member
Apr 10, 2008
32,252
14,815
112
I don't have the issue i guess b/c mine isn't updated, but I'd try clearing the cache/cookies if you havent already. Then there is the preload webpage to save bandwidth feature, maybe try turning that off.
Thanks. Tried that just now and still doing the same thing. Guess it's just a bug umm 'feature' now.
 

Crushgroove

New member
Oct 11, 2014
7,331
1,961
0
I want to hear it from fuster, I hate the chrome application domination and would love to hear his alternative
I'm in front of a PC 9-10 hours day for work and play. I'm not a person that tries to view info on a 5-inch screen when it is available to old eyes in much larger format, with a keyboard and a mouse and at lightening speed. My phone is for communication 90% of the time. YMMV.

FWIW, FF on PC and handheld device. I have no use for waiting on Chrome to constantly catch up to FF's capabilities and compatibility.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheEgyptianMagician

funKYcat75

Well-known member
Apr 10, 2008
32,252
14,815
112
I'm in front of a PC 9-10 hours day for work and play. I'm not a person that tries to view info on a 5-inch screen when it is available to old eyes in much larger format, with a keyboard and a mouse and at lightening speed. My phone is for communication 90% of the time. YMMV.

FWIW, FF on PC and handheld device. I have no use for waiting on Chrome to constantly catch up to FF's capabilities and compatibility.
Just my experience, but I find more compatibility issues with FF than I do Chrome, when I'm on desktop. Especially when it comes to Adobe stuff (which is pain in the ***, anyway)
 

mdlUK.1

New member
Dec 23, 2002
29,712
3,216
0
Just my experience, but I find more compatibility issues with FF than I do Chrome, when I'm on desktop. Especially when it comes to Adobe stuff (which is pain in the ***, anyway)
Used to love FF but I agree with you on the compatibility issues. And I quit using it because I found IT to be a huge memory hog.
 
Mar 23, 2012
23,493
1,384
0
I'm in front of a PC 9-10 hours day for work and play. I'm not a person that tries to view info on a 5-inch screen when it is available to old eyes in much larger format, with a keyboard and a mouse and at lightening speed. My phone is for communication 90% of the time. YMMV.

FWIW, FF on PC and handheld device. I have no use for waiting on Chrome to constantly catch up to FF's capabilities and compatibility.
Never have had a problem with Chrome being incompatible. Don't know what you mean by capabilities.
 

Crushgroove

New member
Oct 11, 2014
7,331
1,961
0
Just my experience, but I find more compatibility issues with FF than I do Chrome, when I'm on desktop. Especially when it comes to Adobe stuff (which is pain in the ***, anyway)

Used to love FF but I agree with you on the compatibility issues. And I quit using it because I found IT to be a huge memory hog.

Never have had a problem with Chrome being incompatible. Don't know what you mean by capabilities.

Most of my issues stemmed from Blackboard and Pearson MyLabPlus access. Constant issues with Chrome. Like, will not jive at all. Reinstalled several times as Chrome is the recommended browser for both, still no joy. Switched back to FF and both run like a top. This was, I guess, 2 years ago that I switched to Chrome. Switched back after a month of frustration. This was also during a time that Adblock was still a pipe dream for Chrome, and I didn't like that, either.

HATE the Chrome interface for favorites/bookmarks. HATE IT. It feels and looks generic and imported lists aren't/weren't pliable at all. The constant switch back a forth between Chrome bookmarks and imported lists... I just was not a fan at all.

At this time, and I'm sure it's caught up now, but FF just had so many more add-ons and customizations... like the thumbnail zoom for FB and Twitter, etc. That thing sucks on Chrome, but FF has several that work really well.

"Chrome splits every tab, plugin, and extension into its own process, so that if one thing crashes—like Flash—it doesn’t bring down the whole web page, or all your tabs at once. This can lead to higher memory (aka RAM) usage, since it has to duplicate some tasks for every tab. But it also makes things a lot more convenient.

There are other things going on behind the scenes, too. Chrome's prerendering feature, for example, can cause higher memory usage, but it also means your web pages load faster. Certain extensions or web sites may also leak memory, which won’t get “cleaned up” when you’re done with it, causing higher RAM usage over time.


And, of course, the more tabs, extensions, and plugins you have open, installed, and running, the more memory Chrome is going to use.


So yes: Chrome uses a lot of RAM, but it (mostly) does so with good reason: your convenience. Most of us have become accustomed to lots of tabs and fast page loading, and the price we pay is measured in gigabytes of RAM. That’s not to say Chrome couldn’t use some memory optimization—it probably could—but this is likely the future of web browsing."


I get over 50mbps down and nearly 5 up, even faster at work, so page load speed isn't really an issue for me. In my experience, FF, using roughly the same add-ons and features, uses a little more than half the RAM Chrome does.
 
Mar 23, 2012
23,493
1,384
0
Firefox is every bit as much of a memory hog as Chrome is. I enabled the extensions that I use that are available for both browsers, opened the exact same tabs, Firefox was maybe a couple hundred MB of RAM less, so basically nothing. But this is 2015, if your struggling for RAM get rid of your POS computer.
 

Crushgroove

New member
Oct 11, 2014
7,331
1,961
0
RAM is only a small part of the bigger problem... which is the browser being an outdated hunk of ****.