Why is this allowed? Are they just letting anything go in the era of NIL when it comes to recruits?
This applies to like 5 guys on their roster.Illinois new star Freshman is a former euro pro who is about to turn 20.
Because nobody's telling them no.I feel like in time some of the stuff has to be sorted out but for now things are changing at break neck speed and some teams are pushing the envelope. Or maybe it the lack of the envelope
I believe previously you could have played with a professional team before coming to NCAA but had to prove you were only paid “necessary” expenses like housing/food and not a salary above that. That’s why some low-level European pros could come over here with eligibility.Didn’t Jean-Marc Melchior play pro ball way back when before he was a ‘Cat? I feel like this isn’t new.
Why is this allowed? Are they just letting anything go in the era of NIL when it comes to recruits?
Does Joe get to be a 22-year-old freshman with all the eligibility that entails?Let's say Joe plays two years for the University of Florida and is paid $200,000.
Then we have Luis, same age as Joe, plays professionally in Spain for two years and makes $200,000.
Let's say we want to recruit one of these two players to Northwestern for their remaining eligibility. Both earned money playing basketball for the past two years. Why would the NCAA treat them differently?
It's hard to separate the two with NIL.Does Joe get to be a 22-year-old freshman with all the eligibility that entails?
Usually, people go to school to be students and then become professionals upon graduation.
Poor Chris Weinke.It's hard to separate the two with NIL.
It's the AGE which is where you might be able to make some logical inroads.
4 years if you start college at 20 or under on Sept 1 of the school year
3 years if you start college at 21 on Sept 1 of the school year
2 years if you start college at 22 on Sept 1 of school year
1 year if you start college at 23 on Sept 1 of school year
You have no eligibility if you are 24 on Sept 1 of school year.
What's the point of schools fielding teams, at that point? If they aren't providing opportunities for students, why should the system survive?I think we’re within 10 years of players not having to be students. They can choose to go to school but that will not be a requirement and instead they will be employees of the university.
I think that should be the central question - although I know it won't be. The current Bball one-and-dones at Duke etc. only do school as long as the season lasts and obviously have absolutely no intention of graduating, or in many cases learning much of anything. I have scholar friends from other parts of the world who have taught at our universities who think our big time college athletics with all of this $ are simply bizarre.What's the point of schools fielding teams, at that point? If they aren't providing opportunities for students, why should the system survive?
The one-and-done rule is, in part, because the NBA changed their draft rules in 2005 so that players must be one year removed from high school. I would've liked the NCAA to have taken the NBA to court over it as a discriminatory practice that has detrimental downstream effects on the competitiveness of the college game. Of course, the Dooks of the world don't want the practice to end, so the NCAA has been happy to let the practice continue.I think that should be the central question - although I know it won't be. The current Bball one-and-dones at Duke etc. only do school as long as the season lasts and obviously have absolutely no intention of graduating, or in many cases learning much of anything. I have scholar friends from other parts of the world who have taught at our universities who think our big time college athletics with all of this $ are simply bizarre.
I just think if you’re 24 before some date around the start of the season - like Aug 15 for football or Nov 1 for basketball - you’re just done. No exceptions. Keep all the other rules as is and add that. Deals with the JUCO stuff and the euro pro stuff. This is a U24 endeavor. Strong precedence for leagues with those rules, seems like it would hold legal muster.It's hard to separate the two with NIL.
It's the AGE which is where you might be able to make some logical inroads.
4 years if you start college at 20 or under on Sept 1 of the school year
3 years if you start college at 21 on Sept 1 of the school year
2 years if you start college at 22 on Sept 1 of school year
1 year if you start college at 23 on Sept 1 of school year
You have no eligibility if you are 24 on Sept 1 of school year.
Works for me. I'm also most certainly not a lawyer. Nor do I play one on TV. Nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn last night.I just think if you’re 24 before some date around the start of the season - like Aug 15 for football or Nov 1 for basketball - you’re just done. No exceptions. Keep all the other rules as is and add that. Deals with the JUCO stuff and the euro pro stuff. This is a U24 endeavor. Strong precedence for leagues with those rules, seems like it would hold legal muster.
It just strikes me as something with a long legal basis given many other sports leagues and activities with age limitsWorks for me. I'm also most certainly not a lawyer. Nor do I play one on TV. Nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn last night.
The one and dones at Duke really don’t have many choices. If the NBA had the “old rules” these guys would enter the draft out of HS, get picked, and the issue would be mostly resolved. Choosing Duke over the G league makes a ton of sense for these guys, better exposure, better money with Duke. I don’t think many make a pretense that they are at Duke for a degree. The career path is defined in HS. They are essentially professional athletes that don’t care much about ECON 101. It may annoy some fans, but it makes sense or the player and the school.I think that should be the central question - although I know it won't be. The current Bball one-and-dones at Duke etc. only do school as long as the season lasts and obviously have absolutely no intention of graduating, or in many cases learning much of anything. I have scholar friends from other parts of the world who have taught at our universities who think our big time college athletics with all of this $ are simply bizarre.
Word for word.It’s such a damn joke. The NCAA should show backbone but they’re so scared if they don’t let these schools do it that they’ll break away. College sports doesn’t have the appeal it used to even if I still do love it.