They are definitely covering their basis (aka trying to keep the 1 seed) by saying he "could" be back by the start of the NCAA Tourney. That is cute, very Boeheim like.Originally posted by bluinbville:
I asked a doctor yesterday about this scenario and he said four weeks minimum to return if they were able to use the laparoscopic incision. More if the incision is larger. UVA would have to make the Final Four without him for him to play. He would be out of game shape by that point. Tough break for the Wahoos.
yeah didn't Syracuse wait until the tourney a couple years ago to pull Fab Melo? After the seedings got announced, later that weekOriginally posted by Wildcat-in-STL:
I wouldnt be shocked if we find out after the first weekend of the tournament that Anderson is done for the year. Teams tend to go to great lengths to keep their projected seeding because if they admitted a player was done , they'd drop a seed line or two.
Defensively they are but offensively they aren't IMO UVA is the 7th or 8th best team IF AND THAT IS A HUGE IF THEY ARE HEALTHY. But Wisconsin , Duke , Nova , and a few others are better and that is if they have Anderson . Without him there are 15-20 teams better . I won't believe Anderson is back til i see it so at this moment i would rank the top 10 asOriginally posted by kyjeff1:
Caneintally, you don't really believe that UVA is down on the level with schools like wichita state do you? If you seriously think that way than I have no choice but to say you don't know what you're looking at. It might be boring to watch but the UVA team is a top 4 team with or without Justin Anderson.
This ^^^^ Even if he makes it back, he will be in poor game shape...especially v. the Best of the Best...Originally posted by bluinbville:
I asked a doctor yesterday about this scenario and he said four weeks minimum to return if they were able to use the laparoscopic incision. More if the incision is larger. UVA would have to make the Final Four without him for him to play. He would be out of game shape by that point. Tough break for the Wahoos.
Originally posted by caneintally:
Defensively they are but offensively they aren't IMO UVA is the 7th or 8th best team IF AND THAT IS A HUGE IF THEY ARE HEALTHY. But Wisconsin , Duke , Nova , and a few others are better and that is if they have Anderson . Without him there are 15-20 teams better . I won't believe Anderson is back til i see it so at this moment i would rank the top 10 asOriginally posted by kyjeff1:
Caneintally, you don't really believe that UVA is down on the level with schools like wichita state do you? If you seriously think that way than I have no choice but to say you don't know what you're looking at. It might be boring to watch but the UVA team is a top 4 team with or without Justin Anderson.
1.UK
2.Wisconsin
3.Duke
4.NOva
5.Witchita St
6.Zona
7.Notre Dame
8,Maryland
9. Iowa St
10.Gonzaga
Come on now Will.
Wichita St #5? And ahead of Zona? The Shockers have ONE win against a good team and that was a mid major. Iowa State lost to Texas Tech and to South Carolina at home!
Virginia already beat Maryland @ Maryland and Notre Dame @ Notre Dame.
Gonzaga has been exposed to be what we all thought they would be.
I wouldn't disrespect UVA like this.
That's an awful Top 10 list. Duke should be #2, Wisconsin #3 or #4.Originally posted by caneintally:
Defensively they are but offensively they aren't IMO UVA is the 7th or 8th best team IF AND THAT IS A HUGE IF THEY ARE HEALTHY. But Wisconsin , Duke , Nova , and a few others are better and that is if they have Anderson . Without him there are 15-20 teams better . I won't believe Anderson is back til i see it so at this moment i would rank the top 10 asOriginally posted by kyjeff1:
Caneintally, you don't really believe that UVA is down on the level with schools like wichita state do you? If you seriously think that way than I have no choice but to say you don't know what you're looking at. It might be boring to watch but the UVA team is a top 4 team with or without Justin Anderson.
1.UK
2.Wisconsin
3.Duke
4.NOva
5.Witchita St
6.Zona
7.Notre Dame
8,Maryland
9. Iowa St
10.Gonzaga
Originally posted by bluinbville:
I asked a doctor yesterday about this scenario and he said four weeks minimum to return if they were able to use the laparoscopic incision. More if the incision is larger. UVA would have to make the Final Four without him for him to play. He would be out of game shape by that point. Tough break for the Wahoos.
Probably the same doctor Rick Pitino uses initially when a kid gets injured.Originally posted by MS59:
Excellent prognosis by your DR lol.
Originally posted by bluinbville:
I asked a doctor yesterday about this scenario and he said four weeks minimum to return if they were able to use the laparoscopic incision. More if the incision is larger. UVA would have to make the Final Four without him for him to play. He would be out of game shape by that point. Tough break for the Wahoos.