I'm sure that's what it is. Gotta have a ceremony.
Rolen is a career .281 hitter, 316 HR, 2077 hits. A solid ballplayer? Absolutely. HOF worthy? Not even close.
It's been getting watered down for years, so this is nothing new. But, as you say, you gotta have the ceremony. I think not having some years would make it really special when you did actually have it.
The writers are who vote, seems most of them could care less about a ceremony. Cooperstown is who suffers.
Andruw Jones
top 5 outfielder all time in terms of defense.
Top 50 in HRs.
Fell 2nd in 2005 MVP voting to the best offensive player of his era (Pujols).
Gary Sheffield
30th all time RBIs (every player above him is in HOF that is eligible except Bonds, Palmeiro and AROD)
26th in HRs - 506 total
.292 Batting Average - not jump off the page great, but not a bad line there
9x all star
The voters are too high on their horses to allow anyone's who name was mentioned around steroids to be put in. Get used to this being the norm for the next 10 years because of that.
Do I condone the use of steroids in baseball, no. However, 75% of the league or more were using them. Batters had to face pitchers that were on roids. Pitchers had to face batters that were on roids. It wasn't a clear and distinct advantage to anyone. It just made the really good players really really good. The good players really good. The average good, and so on. In an era where it was the norm, it shouldn't keep certain players out because they did what they had to do to be competitive.