What is wrong with universal background checks?

bamaEER

Freshman
May 29, 2001
32,435
60
0
Seems like a great solution and focuses on the problem....threat risk of the people buying the guns.
 

bamaEER

Freshman
May 29, 2001
32,435
60
0
How much of the gun violence would they prevent?
Another layer of protection. Would certainly flag some nutcases. Plus your crowd has been saying all along that ‘guns don’t kill people, people kill people’. This goes right to the heart of the problem.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,233
3,298
113
Seems like a great solution and focuses on the problem....threat risk of the people buying the guns.
At a macro level, I think it’s fine. It’s the details where the problem lies.

It introduces a layer of bureaucracy into the equation which is basically just a tax and added expense for 99% of the population of gun owners. Essentially engineering a solution to what is a statistical irrelevance. You’re targeting the crazy and that’s basically less than .1%.

It would also stop the ability for a person to sell or trade their firearms with friends or family. Additionally, it limits the ability of someone trying to bequeath them to a relative.
 

mule_eer

Freshman
May 6, 2002
20,439
59
48
At a macro level, I think it’s fine. It’s the details where the problem lies.

It introduces a layer of bureaucracy into the equation which is basically just a tax and added expense for 99% of the population of gun owners. Essentially engineering a solution to what is a statistical irrelevance. You’re targeting the crazy and that’s basically less than .1%.

It would also stop the ability for a person to sell or trade their firearms with friends or family. Additionally, it limits the ability of someone trying to bequeath them to a relative.
I get your point about someone inheriting a collection from a relative. That's a tougher wrinkle to this. I would argue that the private sales can still go through, they just need to involve someone to run the check. Is it free? Nope. Is it a huge hurdle? Nope. The real question on that piece of the puzzle is enforcement. How do you enforce that new rule? I mean, it would stop something like a craigslist ad, but it would be hard to track if I sold a gun to a friend.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,233
3,298
113
The real question on that piece of the puzzle is enforcement. How do you enforce that new rule? I mean, it would stop something like a craigslist ad, but it would be hard to track if I sold a gun to a friend.
Agreed.

You mean a Democrat feel good measure would have unintended negative consequences and not actually solve a problem to a statistically unsolvable problem?

Par!!!
 

Mntneer

Sophomore
Oct 7, 2001
10,192
196
0
Got easy solution:

Republicans agree with gun reform
Democrats agree to voter registration reform

:popcorn:

The left would NEVER bite on that, but let's have the right give in on universal background checks, if and only if, all voting follows the REAL ID Act.
 

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,556
40
31
he real question on that piece of the puzzle is enforcement. How do you enforce that new rule?
The only enforcement option is to severely hammer someone after the fact and frighten people into self enforcing. How well do those help? How often do they (sentences) get reduced?

I don't see it helping.
 

Mntneer

Sophomore
Oct 7, 2001
10,192
196
0
The only enforcement option is to severely hammer someone after the fact and frighten people into self enforcing. How well do those help? How often do they (sentences) get reduced?

I don't see it helping.

Unfortunately they don't prosecute many straw purchases now as it is. I know a guy who owned a store, reported several straw purchase attempts. I think only 1 went beyond the basic reporting, and he was told that there would probably be nothing substantial done.

There are plenty of laws on the books that could be enforced, but just aren't.
 

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,556
40
31
Unfortunately they don't prosecute many straw purchases now as it is. I know a guy who owned a store, reported several straw purchase attempts. I think only 1 went beyond the basic reporting, and he was told that there would probably be nothing substantial done.

There are plenty of laws on the books that could be enforced, but just aren't.
Like immigration. All that noise about arresting 600-700 illegal food workers. Not a f'n thing done to the owners/management. Nothing to deter them from hiring more illegals.
 

rog1187

All-American
May 29, 2001
70,024
5,613
113
Another layer of protection. Would certainly flag some nutcases. Plus your crowd has been saying all along that ‘guns don’t kill people, people kill people’. This goes right to the heart of the problem.
Would it have stopped some or any? I think every time in recent times that we have had an event, the story is that the shooter obtained the gun(s) legally. I guess it depends on what the background check is checking as to whether or not it would prevent anything.
 

30CAT

All-American
May 29, 2001
171,221
5,144
113
You think ordinary citizens should have 100-round magazines, bump stocks, flash suppressors, etc?

'Should' have? No....but if law-abiding, American citizens want them, they have a right to have them and I have no concerns with that whatsoever. In fact, I like it.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
'Should' have? No....but if law-abiding, American citizens want them, they have a right to have them and I have no concerns with that whatsoever. In fact, I like it.

They have a right to have them? Can you show me where in the Constitution it says we have a right to own bumpstocks, 100-round magazines, flash suppressors, etc? Full autos? Can’t seem to find that in the Constitution either.
 

Shirley Knott

Redshirt
May 26, 2017
12,831
0
0
They have a right to have them? Can you show me where in the Constitution it says we have a right to own bumpstocks, 100-round magazines, flash suppressors, etc? Full autos? Can’t seem to find that in the Constitution either.
The constitution doesn't mention zebra striped idiots either, yet here you are...
 

rog1187

All-American
May 29, 2001
70,024
5,613
113
They have a right to have them? Can you show me where in the Constitution it says we have a right to own bumpstocks, 100-round magazines, flash suppressors, etc? Full autos? Can’t seem to find that in the Constitution either.
Show me where it says we should just own muskets.
 
Last edited:

WVU82_rivals

Senior
May 29, 2001
199,091
693
0


 

30CAT

All-American
May 29, 2001
171,221
5,144
113
They have a right to have them? Can you show me where in the Constitution it says we have a right to own bumpstocks, 100-round magazines, flash suppressors, etc? Full autos? Can’t seem to find that in the Constitution either.

I'm pretty sure those items are the essence of the guns.
 

EEResistable

All-American
May 29, 2001
89,612
6,176
61
They have a right to have them? Can you show me where in the Constitution it says we have a right to own bumpstocks, 100-round magazines, flash suppressors, etc? Full autos? Can’t seem to find that in the Constitution either.

2nd Amendment.

Where does it say women have the right to murder their babies?