Seems like a great solution and focuses on the problem....threat risk of the people buying the guns.
How much of the gun violence would they prevent?Seems like a great solution and focuses on the problem....threat risk of the people buying the guns.
For Repubs there is no problem only collateral damage.Seems like a great solution and focuses on the problem....threat risk of the people buying the guns.
How much of the gun violence would they prevent?
Another layer of protection. Would certainly flag some nutcases. Plus your crowd has been saying all along that ‘guns don’t kill people, people kill people’. This goes right to the heart of the problem.How much of the gun violence would they prevent?
Seems like a great solution and focuses on the problem
and voter picture ID and I can agree on universal background checks.Got easy solution:
Republicans agree with gun reform
Democrats agree to voter registration reform
opcorn:
Talking to NRA supporters is a waste of time. Just win the POTUS and the Senate and do whatever Dems want to do about it.The NRA says they're bad.
No, the problem is who gets the guns.So you think the problem is guns?![]()
So you think the problem is guns?![]()
At a macro level, I think it’s fine. It’s the details where the problem lies.Seems like a great solution and focuses on the problem....threat risk of the people buying the guns.
None of those things are addressed in what he asked.You think ordinary citizens should have 100-round magazines, bump stocks, flash suppressors, etc?
Less guns/more whores
That's what this country needs
Legalize prostitution
I get your point about someone inheriting a collection from a relative. That's a tougher wrinkle to this. I would argue that the private sales can still go through, they just need to involve someone to run the check. Is it free? Nope. Is it a huge hurdle? Nope. The real question on that piece of the puzzle is enforcement. How do you enforce that new rule? I mean, it would stop something like a craigslist ad, but it would be hard to track if I sold a gun to a friend.At a macro level, I think it’s fine. It’s the details where the problem lies.
It introduces a layer of bureaucracy into the equation which is basically just a tax and added expense for 99% of the population of gun owners. Essentially engineering a solution to what is a statistical irrelevance. You’re targeting the crazy and that’s basically less than .1%.
It would also stop the ability for a person to sell or trade their firearms with friends or family. Additionally, it limits the ability of someone trying to bequeath them to a relative.
Where can I send my maximum campaign contribution?Less guns/more whores
That's what this country needs
Legalize prostitution
Agreed.The real question on that piece of the puzzle is enforcement. How do you enforce that new rule? I mean, it would stop something like a craigslist ad, but it would be hard to track if I sold a gun to a friend.
Got easy solution:
Republicans agree with gun reform
Democrats agree to voter registration reform
opcorn:
Where can I send my maximum campaign contribution?
The only enforcement option is to severely hammer someone after the fact and frighten people into self enforcing. How well do those help? How often do they (sentences) get reduced?he real question on that piece of the puzzle is enforcement. How do you enforce that new rule?
The only enforcement option is to severely hammer someone after the fact and frighten people into self enforcing. How well do those help? How often do they (sentences) get reduced?
I don't see it helping.
Like immigration. All that noise about arresting 600-700 illegal food workers. Not a f'n thing done to the owners/management. Nothing to deter them from hiring more illegals.Unfortunately they don't prosecute many straw purchases now as it is. I know a guy who owned a store, reported several straw purchase attempts. I think only 1 went beyond the basic reporting, and he was told that there would probably be nothing substantial done.
There are plenty of laws on the books that could be enforced, but just aren't.
Would it have stopped some or any? I think every time in recent times that we have had an event, the story is that the shooter obtained the gun(s) legally. I guess it depends on what the background check is checking as to whether or not it would prevent anything.Another layer of protection. Would certainly flag some nutcases. Plus your crowd has been saying all along that ‘guns don’t kill people, people kill people’. This goes right to the heart of the problem.
Seems like a great solution and focuses on the problem....threat risk of the people buying the guns.
What is wrong with Voter ID?
You think ordinary citizens should have 100-round magazines, bump stocks, flash suppressors, etc?
Expunging criminal pasts would need to stop...and voter picture ID and I can agree on universal background checks.
'Should' have? No....but if law-abiding, American citizens want them, they have a right to have them and I have no concerns with that whatsoever. In fact, I like it.
The constitution doesn't mention zebra striped idiots either, yet here you are...They have a right to have them? Can you show me where in the Constitution it says we have a right to own bumpstocks, 100-round magazines, flash suppressors, etc? Full autos? Can’t seem to find that in the Constitution either.
Which previous mass shooting, would a Universal background check have prevented?Seems like a great solution and focuses on the problem....
Show me where it says we should just own muskets.They have a right to have them? Can you show me where in the Constitution it says we have a right to own bumpstocks, 100-round magazines, flash suppressors, etc? Full autos? Can’t seem to find that in the Constitution either.
They have a right to have them? Can you show me where in the Constitution it says we have a right to own bumpstocks, 100-round magazines, flash suppressors, etc? Full autos? Can’t seem to find that in the Constitution either.
They have a right to have them? Can you show me where in the Constitution it says we have a right to own bumpstocks, 100-round magazines, flash suppressors, etc? Full autos? Can’t seem to find that in the Constitution either.