So what era of Christianity do you find appealing?Just another example of many things that has turned me off from "modern day Christianity".
I dont agree with that story at all. Judgemental is judgemental. It is the most unappealing quality of the church people
I thought he looked and sounded out of place too.
So what era of Christianity do you find appealing?
I love how he panders to these people and they apparently aren't even aware. Talking about loving the christians and protecting them. Calling a verse from 2nd corinthians, "two corinthians". Talking about "the evangelicals". Cursing during his speech. He doesn't know how to speak their language. It's comically painful to watch him grovel. And they apparently fall for it hook, line and sinker. But it shouldn't surprise anyone since they also believe a lot of crazy ****....like the earth is 6000 years old and man and dinosaurs coexisted among many other wild things.
I'll bet their support for Trump is mostly because they don't want Hillary.I love how he panders to these people and they apparently aren't even aware. Talking about loving the christians and protecting them. Calling a verse from 2nd corinthians, "two corinthians". Talking about "the evangelicals". Cursing during his speech. He doesn't know how to speak their language. It's comically painful to watch him grovel. And they apparently fall for it hook, line and sinker. But it shouldn't surprise anyone since they also believe a lot of crazy ****....like the earth is 6000 years old and man and dinosaurs coexisted among many other wild things.
She doesn't know how to speak their language. It's comically painful to watch her grovel. And they apparently fall for it hook, line and sinker.
They are voting for who carries their religious agenda and for many it comes down to just same sex marriage and abortion.They (evangelicals) have no credibility any more. If they'll support an idiot like Cruz or Trump, they clearly don't want what is best for America or are not really voting based on Christian principles. They are voting solely based on political party. Aren't those the same people that attack Jimmy Carter?
he'll sprint (not run) from people like THE and leave them to Cruz
I don't thinks that's the case concerning the church of the 70's. But I agree the church should be Kingdom-focused and not kingdoms-focused. I think the church should have a voice in politics without being politico-centric.Well, it seems to me, I could be wrong, that the church wasn't so political in the 70s. Billy Graham never got political, he was focused on winning the lost to Christ. His poor misguided son Franklin is a polar opposite, mostly everything he says is political. I used to be pretty faithful about attending church. The only time I plan to set foot in church again is for weddings and funerals.
I disagree. Christ was welcoming to all. At least that is true with the brand of Christianity that i practice. Politics by its nature is dividing. It makes people choose a side and with today's generation, most people can't favor a political position without demonizing the opposite. That is the problem with bible thumpers.I don't thinks that's the case concerning the church of the 70's. But I agree the church should be Kingdom-focused and not kingdoms-focused. I think the church should have a voice in politics without being politico-centric.
I guess I would say even with a cursory reading of the Gospels one could not help but notice Jesus is divisive, often found in arguments and disputes. Jesus is exclusive, saying one has to follow him and he is the only way to God. Jesus is a Bible-thumper. In a standard size and print Bible Jesus quotes the Old Testament about three times per page of Gospels.I disagree. Christ was welcoming to all. At least that is true with the brand of Christianity that i practice. Politics by its nature is dividing. It makes people choose a side and with today's generation, most people can't favor a political position without demonizing the opposite. That is the problem with bible thumpers.
Love thy neighbor as yourself is foreign?I guess I would say even with a cursory reading of the Gospels one could not help but notice Jesus is divisive, often found in arguments and disputes. Jesus is exclusive, saying one has to follow him and he is the only way to God. Jesus is a Bible-thumper. In a standard size and print Bible Jesus quotes the Old Testament about three times per page of Gospels.
The form of Christianity you seem to be advocating is foreign to the New Testament and history of the Christianity.
Turn the other cheekLove thy neighbor as yourself is foreign?
At least that is true with the brand of Christianity that i practice.
No, and nothing I said would suggest it is foreign. However, do you really believe you should love your neighbor if you find he's a registered sex offender...a pedophile?Love thy neighbor as yourself is foreign?
Turn the other cheek
Pray in secret
give to Caesar
Also foreign concepts to today's bible thumpers who love war and want to make a big show of their religion. Greedy too.
No, and nothing I said would suggest it is foreign. However, do you really believe you should love your neighbor if you find he's a registered sex offender...a pedophile?
That's interesting, just not found in the Bible. For instance Jesus specifically said he did not come to do away with the Law. He did preach complete exclusivity. He preached loyalty to himself above all else. He preached very little of judgmentalism, and he preached nothing on the judgmentalism by the contemporary definition.I would have to disagree Jesus did not preach that way at all. He welcomed everyone and was never exclusive. Most of his more negative comments were toward individuals who held themselves out to be Religious and morally better than others. Christ did preach a new idea that we should make the love of others are primary concern as opposed to constantly being judgmental. In addition he preached that we should do away with the old law. If Christians would be willing to follow the teachings and directions of Christ then that would solve, if not eliminate, multiple problems.
That's interesting, just not found in the Bible. For instance Jesus specifically said he did not come to do away with the Law. He did preach complete exclusivity. He preached loyalty to himself above all else. He preached very little of judgmentalism, and he preached nothing on the judgmentalism by the contemporary definition.
Did he not teach us that we all sin? I was taught not to be judgmental as that is also a sin. And yes you are implying it is foreign with your comments.No, and nothing I said would suggest it is foreign. However, do you really believe you should love your neighbor if you find he's a registered sex offender...a pedophile?
My brand is well represented in this post. What is your point?Who's brand is that?
I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.
Whoever therefore breaks one of the least of these commandments, and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever does and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
But whoever says, ‘You fool!’ shall be in danger of hell fire.
But I say to you that whoever looks at a woman to lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart.
But I say to you, love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you
How are you with this one:Turn the other cheek
Pray in secret
give to Caesar
Also foreign concepts to today's bible thumpers who love war and want to make a big show of their religion. Greedy too.
I'm not implying its foreign at all. I accept it as truth.Did he not teach us that we all sin? I was taught not to be judgmental as that is also a sin. And yes you are implying it is foreign with your comments.
Turn the other cheek
Pray in secret
give to Caesar
Also foreign concepts to today's bible thumpers who love war and want to make a big show of their religion. Greedy too.
I thought he looked and sounded out of place too.
Greedy too - No, Nowhere does the Bible say "Thou shalt give your money to the government to feed the hungry, cloth the naked, etc.".
You do know that the money changing had handled by the local government and throwing the money changers out was throwing the government out of the Temple, right?Yes, that would be completely inconsistent with the teachings of Jesus...who threw the money changers out of the temple and fed the masses.
Yes, that would be completely inconsistent with the teachings of Jesus...who threw the money changers out of the temple and fed the masses.
Are you really this dense or just being obtuse since you find yourself talking out of both sides of your mouth?I'm not implying its foreign at all. I accept it as truth.
However, are you saying you can't judge whether or not pedophilia is wrong?
The Bible say to work to earn so that you can share with those in need. To the best of my knowledge, it does not require that to be done individually.It would be inconsistent. The government is not showing the love of Christ. If I do it personally, I am.
Are you really this dense or just being obtuse since you find yourself talking out of both sides of your mouth?
Of course I have morals and pedophilia is wrong and immoral and a horrible crime. That is different than the teaching of being judgmental of others in the context of the bible and how i used it in my comments.
Actually, I think I'm being quite consistent.Are you really this dense or just being obtuse since you find yourself talking out of both sides of your mouth?
Of course I have morals and pedophilia is wrong and immoral and a horrible crime. That is different than the teaching of being judgmental of others in the context of the bible and how i used it in my comments.
The Bible does specifically say giving should not be under compulsion.The Bible say to work to earn so that you can share with those in need. To the best of my knowledge, it does not require that to be done individually.