What's happening with "collusion" and "healthcare"?
- Thread starter DvlDog4WVU
- Start date
Last I was aware. The healthcare bill is simply being "reworked" because there aren't enough votes. My personal opinion is that the bill won't be repealed or replaced, so the GOP can feed off of it during midterms. Trump says repeal, then replace later (at last tweet that is).
Collusion? Some more stuff about Kushner the other day. More ex-position holders talking bs about how the Russia thing is bad, but Trump plugged the holes. The rightwing talking points center around degrading Mueller's credibility....im guessing just in case something is found. Personally, I'm waiting to see what Mueller finds.....I'm not optimistic he will find much, not because it didn't happen, but because evidence surely can't be obvious or abundant.
Wouldn't the absence of evidence kind of counter that? As in, there is no evidence because there was no collusion?
I'll wait until Mueller comes out with (or doesn't come out with)...can't imagine it would take this long...seems like the MSM and libtards had all the 'evidence'.
The left fed the MSM a bunch of circumstantial **** that when viewed out of context created a narrative of collusion. Much weight was given to the real estate deal from 10 years prior as "evidence". Friggin cuntytard parroted that **** for 2 months.
Dog, it's not just the MSM that wants this investigated. GOP controlled congress wanted it too
The GOP got pushed into that corner...and they bowed down to it like Obama to a foreign leader.
In a nut shell, the Establishment from both major parties collude to stall Healthcare while they position themselves for the mid-terms. "F the people, we want to keep our gigs, but we'll feign outrage and there will even be tears. We just think about the prospect of doing honest work for a living to conger tears." Meanwhile, the current and proposed plan is a big shitbomb.
Awwww...those poor wittle Reps and Senators for made to do something dey didn't want to? Those mean bullies!
Did I mention anything that contradicted that statement? And again, investigating Russia is not the same as investigating Trump.
Investigating collusion isn't the same thing as saying there was collusion. And if you really think investigating Russian interference doesn't include investigating the Trump campaign (which is Trump himself), than I'm glad you're not making calls on this deal here.
It's cool, we're just not going to see eye to eye. Just keep it in mind when you're compared to the idiot birthers. And yes, it's the same.
That's not true at all, imo. And if Mueller comes out and says "no collusion" I'll drop it completely.
Now you are trying so hard you look like a tool (well, actually you did already, this just makes it worse).
I doubt it. BTW is Hillary Clinton being investigated by Mueller since there have been questions about Clinton and Russian connections?
Sure. Makes perfect sense, she colluded to get the beating that ended her political career. Great logic there, deliverance
Is it? It's sad that I want to ensure the fact that the candidate that a foreign state wanted to win, had no part in the interference strategy?
She wasn't thinking real well, but at least she was as tall as Putin when the Secret Service held her up.
You don't remember all the Hillary and Bill's Russian deals? I think they were getting a lot more money out of the Russians than Trump.
I honestly don't have any problem with people earned my money from foreign governments, Trump has (still does to some degree). Now if it's found that the Clinton Foundation conducted quid pro quo with Hillary as Secretary, I hope they all do prison time (Chelsea included).
She wasn't thinking real well, but at least she was as tall as Putin when the Secret Service held her up.
I still think she's got health issues.