When Fox News....

Oct 23, 2013
20,054
1,569
0
Digs into Philando Castille's legal history and it turns out he had nearly 60 instances of being stopped for a traffic stop largely occurring in a part of town that is 92% White.... of which just a handful stick in court.......but racial prejudice doesn't play a part in this....


 
Oct 23, 2013
20,054
1,569
0
Now is not the time, Sean

You don't get to tell me when I can and cannot post and the subject matter my post can and cannot contain. I feel for those cops and their families....Once again, white people thinking they get to decide when and where one can talk about racial issues....Gotta be the correct time for them.....and that time is virtually never
 

Bill Derington

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2003
17,690
2,057
113
Sure as hell didn't shoot him for breaking a law... unless you justify being shot 4 times and killed over a "broken taillight" that wasn't broken...

I could've swore I read or heard a transcript where he pulled him over because he thought he was an armed robbery suspect?

Just let it go Sean, this is how it'll go down, the Feds will investigate and the cops actions will be found to be justified. The BLM will demand some red meat, so someone about to retire will "resign" because they forwarded an off color email to someone, but pat yourself on the back cause you're gonna get Trump elected in the process.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UK till Death

Supreme Lord Z

New member
Jan 7, 2016
3,445
2,364
0
The cop shot him as a sign of solidarity with the Louisiana police. If he didn't want to get shot then he should have not looked like an armed robbery suspect. Personal appearance is a choice so if you choose to look like an armed robber then you should realize that just to be safe the police will probably shoot you on the off chance that you actually do turnout to be a criminal.
 

starchief

New member
Feb 18, 2005
10,137
4,743
0
1. Violate instr permit – dismissed
2. No proof of insurance – guilty
3. Basic speed – guilty
4. Driving after suspension – dismissed
5. No proof of insurance – guilty
6. No seat belt use – dismissed
7. No proof of insurance – guilty
8. Impede traffic – dismissed
9. No Minnesota driver’s license – amended charge guilty
10. Driving after suspension of driver’s license – Convicted
11. No proof of insurance – dismissed
12. No proof of insurance – convicted
13. Driving after revocation – Dismissed
15. Driving after suspension – Dismissed
16. No proof of insurance – guilty
17. Speeding – dismissed
18. Driver’s license – failure to obtain new – dismissed
19. Muffler required – dismissed
20. Driving after revocation – guilty
21. Operation of motor vehicle after loss of license prohibited – dismissed
22. Dangerous public road/water – convicted
23. Driving after revocation – convicted
24. No proof of insurance – dismissed
25. Driving after revocation – convicted
26. Seat belt violation – dismissed
27. Driving after revocation – convicted
28. Proof on insurance – Dismissed
29. Driving after revocation – convicted
30. Driving after revocation – convicted
31. Driving after revocation – convicted
32. Seat belt required – convicted
33. Seat belt required – convicted
34. Driving after revocation – convicted
35. Driving after revocation – convicted
36. Driving after revocation – convicted
37. Driving after revocation – convicted
38. Driving after revocation – convicted
39. Driving after revocation – convicted
40. Stop/stand/park vehicle at any place where official signs prohibit stopping – convicted
41. Expired registration – dismissed
42. Snow emergency parking restrictions – convicted
43. Stop/stand/park vehicle on any street/ally, at the same location, for more than 48 consecutive hours – convicted
44. Abandon motor vehicle on any public/private property without consent – convicted
45. Stop/stand/park vehicle on any street/ally, at the same location, for more than 48 consecutive hours – convicted

In Dakota County, he also had some traffic offenses:

46. Driving after suspension – guilty

In Hennepin County, Castile had these violations:

47. Driving after revocation – convicted
48. Display altered/fictitious insurance card – dismissed
49. Driving after revocation – convicted
50. Seat belt required – dismissed
51. Uninsured vehicle – convicted
52. Driving after revocation – dismissed
53. Seat belt required – dismissed
54. Impromper display original plate – convicted
55. Seat belt required – convicted

I don't know what went down yet. I'll wait and see. I however would not call 35 out of 55 convictions/found guilty a "handful" of times.

Certainly not deserving of death for this of course, but this guy had no business being on the road with this driving record. Periods of no license, no insurance, etc. It's not like most cops for many miles around would not have encountered him driving illegally several times each. He was a poster boy (uh, guy) for the need for uninsured motorist insurance.
 
Last edited:
Nov 7, 2008
13,887
3,651
0
Jesus Christ. You're such an SJW.. have you not seen all the people of color basically calling g you an idiot the last few days? So whites don't like you and also blacks don't like you. I feel for your wife, maybe she's picked on for being with you and not the color of her skin.
 

Supreme Lord Z

New member
Jan 7, 2016
3,445
2,364
0
1. Violate instr permit – dismissed
2. No proof of insurance – guilty
3. Basic speed – guilty
4. Driving after suspension – dismissed
5. No proof of insurance – guilty
6. No seat belt use – dismissed
7. No proof of insurance – guilty
8. Impede traffic – dismissed
9. No Minnesota driver’s license – amended charge guilty
10. Driving after suspension of driver’s license – Convicted
11. No proof of insurance – dismissed
12. No proof of insurance – convicted
13. Driving after revocation – Dismissed
15. Driving after suspension – Dismissed
16. No proof of insurance – guilty
17. Speeding – dismissed
18. Driver’s license – failure to obtain new – dismissed
19. Muffler required – dismissed
20. Driving after revocation – guilty
21. Operation of motor vehicle after loss of license prohibited – dismissed
22. Dangerous public road/water – convicted
23. Driving after revocation – convicted
24. No proof of insurance – dismissed
25. Driving after revocation – convicted
26. Seat belt violation – dismissed
27. Driving after revocation – convicted
28. Proof on insurance – Dismissed
29. Driving after revocation – convicted
30. Driving after revocation – convicted
31. Driving after revocation – convicted
32. Seat belt required – convicted
33. Seat belt required – convicted
34. Driving after revocation – convicted
35. Driving after revocation – convicted
36. Driving after revocation – convicted
37. Driving after revocation – convicted
38. Driving after revocation – convicted
39. Driving after revocation – convicted
40. Stop/stand/park vehicle at any place where official signs prohibit stopping – convicted
41. Expired registration – dismissed
42. Snow emergency parking restrictions – convicted
43. Stop/stand/park vehicle on any street/ally, at the same location, for more than 48 consecutive hours – convicted
44. Abandon motor vehicle on any public/private property without consent – convicted
45. Stop/stand/park vehicle on any street/ally, at the same location, for more than 48 consecutive hours – convicted

In Dakota County, he also had some traffic offenses:

46. Driving after suspension – guilty

In Hennepin County, Castile had these violations:

47. Driving after revocation – convicted
48. Display altered/fictitious insurance card – dismissed
49. Driving after revocation – convicted
50. Seat belt required – dismissed
51. Uninsured vehicle – convicted
52. Driving after revocation – dismissed
53. Seat belt required – dismissed
54. Impromper display original plate – convicted
55. Seat belt required – convicted

I don't know what went down yet. I'll wait and see. I however would not call 35 out of 55 convictions/found guilty a "handful" of times.
If the cops would have shot him the first time they pulled him over then look at all the trouble they would have avoided.
 

.S&C.

New member
Jul 8, 2014
45,271
6,384
0
So when the justice department finds no wrong doing on the part of the cop. Will Sean finally admit there was more to it than what he's constantly blabbering about?

Of course not. It WILL fit his agenda, or else.

Come on Sean. Still waiting on the response of your ilk on the racial biases of the Obama and Lynch justice department.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GoCatsForever2k15

Ukbrassowtipin

New member
Aug 12, 2011
82,101
3,039
0
Digs into Philando Castille's legal history and it turns out he had nearly 60 instances of being stopped for a traffic stop largely occurring in a part of town that is 92% White.... of which just a handful stick in court.......but racial prejudice doesn't play a part in this....


Then tell democrats to stop making new laws and regulations and throwing them everywhere to give them a reason to pull him over. When police have been turned into ticket collectors, it's to pay for more useless government jobs and pay their salaries. Or when a for profit prison system has been created police are out to put people in jail. I'm not in the don't break the law then crowd, I'm in the less government crowd. Or how about this...get rid of their unions. I know libs are obsessed with unions, but what civilized world can you kill someone and be put on "paid leave", or expect behaviors to change when people know there's no repercussion no matter what they do. When are people going to quit forcing the racial aspect of this and stop with the bureaucratic nonsense...throwing more government and telling people it's helping them. Take the government out of everyone's lives and stop believing everything at face value aka "it's for the better for government to do this" "or we need this because they just can't help it"
 

Kooky Kats

New member
Aug 17, 2002
25,741
15,702
0
If we gonna get real on race... it is obvious that Michael Bradley is not the best player on the US Men's NT, yet that Honkey (yeah, I said it) is CAPTAIN?!?!?

Klinsmann is a leftover Nazi fascist, spreading hate and mediocre soccer stylings to a select group of jingoistic dweebs under the guise of sport.

Put a black dude in there as Captain, dammit Sean!
 

CatFromDaHood

New member
Mar 23, 2016
293
131
0
You don't get to tell me when I can and cannot post and the subject matter my post can and cannot contain. I feel for those cops and their families....Once again, white people thinking they get to decide when and where one can talk about racial issues....Gotta be the correct time for them.....and that time is virtually never

All of this is true......but you're pretty much wasting your time and keystrokes.
 
Nov 7, 2008
13,887
3,651
0
So when the justice department finds no wrong doing on the part of the cop. Will Sean finally admit there was more to it than what he's constantly blabbering about?

Of course not. It WILL fit his agenda, or else.

Come on Sean. Still waiting on the response of your ilk on the racial biases of the Obama and Lynch justice department.

No. The investigation will then be a racist investigation. Even if done by a white cop hating black man.
 
  • Like
Reactions: .S&C.

Atrain7732

New member
Dec 11, 2009
3,776
665
0
Rinse and repeat. Will be a same old rehashed version of previous "incidents" like Ferguson. False narrative gets created initially mostly bc the other side (cops) cannot tell their side of the story until investigation is completed. In the meantime this completely false narrative will be continuously perpetuated on tv, demonstrations, etc and will become part of the public narrative.

Then 6 months from now we will find out that the Hispanic officer who pulled over and shot the passenger had fully acted justifiably, thus completely negating the BS story that the fiancé pushed. Maybe not intentional but out of frustration or shock. But still BS nonetheless.

My guess is the conceal carry licensed passenger forgot the first rule of concealed carry--once you let a cop (or anyone really) know that you have a concealed weapon on your person, you DO NOT reach for anything so as not to be mistaken for reaching for a weapon. My personal opinion is that is what likely happened. The freaking cop was 10 times more upset than the damn fiancé. She coulda been in shock. Not judging solely on that. Just pretty much what makes most sense to me.

Of course this could be wrong. The current narrative that the minority officer was out cruising for another minority to go shoot in cold blood in front of his fiancé and infant daughter. That is what makes the most sense.
 

.S&C.

New member
Jul 8, 2014
45,271
6,384
0
Rinse and repeat. Will be a same old rehashed version of previous "incidents" like Ferguson. False narrative gets created initially mostly bc the other side (cops) cannot tell their side of the story until investigation is completed. In the meantime this completely false narrative will be continuously perpetuated on tv, demonstrations, etc and will become part of the public narrative.

Then 6 months from now we will find out that the Hispanic officer who pulled over and shot the passenger had fully acted justifiably, thus completely negating the BS story that the fiancé pushed. Maybe not intentional but out of frustration or shock. But still BS nonetheless.

My guess is the conceal carry licensed passenger forgot the first rule of concealed carry--once you let a cop (or anyone really) know that you have a concealed weapon on your person, you DO NOT reach for anything so as not to be mistaken for reaching for a weapon. My personal opinion is that is what likely happened. The freaking cop was 10 times more upset than the damn fiancé. She coulda been in shock. Not judging solely on that. Just pretty much what makes most sense to me.

Of course this could be wrong. The current narrative that the minority officer was out cruising for another minority to go shoot in cold blood in front of his fiancé and infant daughter. That is what makes the most sense.

X10,000
 

Double Tay

Well-known member
Aug 6, 2003
48,362
1,216
108
Funny that Sean keeps trying to retread these same ridiculous non-stories about police shootings. But yet goes completely silent when five cops are openly executed and numerous other cops have been shot and had chunks of concrete thrown off of overpasses At their heads but he of course likes to pretend like that doesn't happen.

Not to mention the fact that there have been so many black on black shootings and murders since Dallas but they go completely unnoticed. The story about the guy being shot while broadcasting himself on Facebook would be an absolutely enormous story if they find out it's a white guy. But obviously we all know there's less than a 2% chance of that being true.

Someone wake me up when statistics prove you have a higher likelihood of being shot by the police if you're black than if your white.
 

Double Tay

Well-known member
Aug 6, 2003
48,362
1,216
108
I remember that story. I was always amazed it didn't make any media rounds. But what the hell was wrong with that guy? I really don't understand why everyone thinks it's so acceptable to not listen to the police. You cannot reasonably expect cops not to shoot you if you continue to disobey orders and consistently keep reaching into your pocket. How can any reasonable person think like that?
 

Xception

New member
Apr 17, 2007
26,407
5,237
0
I'm sorry but that dumb mofo should have been shot , they told him umpteen times to show his hand . Then this moron pretends to go for something and continues to do so all the way up to his death . This has suicide by police written all over it . The black people getting shot are also resisting arrest or outright ignoring the police warnings , they basically shot themselves . When videos of police shooting people with zero warning and the victims in compliance , then we have a problem .
 
  • Like
Reactions: allabouttheUK