You know what they say, naughty girls need love too…Unless you look like one of these chicks, Samantha isn't interested (she also apparently gets wasted and assaults police officers and, perhaps, her significant others) ...
View attachment 788579
View attachment 788580
View attachment 788581
Uh, who else is there?Wrong Samantha Fox, as far as I’m concerned.
And it would be distributing child porn in this country to show anything inappropriate regarding a 16 year old. So hopefully you aren’t posting photos of her as a 16 year old.Try to remember -- it was Page 6 and she was 16.
View attachment 788800View attachment 788803
She was David Letterman's fantasy - but she never appeared on his show.
Since you are so inappropriately elite in all references to other posters - she first appeared in the UK, her home country. All historical pics of the nature you may speak of have been excluded from any bio that she has approved of in recent years. The fact that you are fearful of some/a error and position of danger for another poster is both comforting and yet questionable.And it would be distributing child porn in this country to show anything inappropriate regarding a 16 year old. So hopefully you aren’t posting photos of her as a 16 year old.
Since you are so inappropriately elite in all references to other posters - she first appeared in the UK, her home country. All historical pics of the nature you may speak of have been excluded from any bio that she has approved of in recent years. The fact that you are fearful of some/a error and position of danger for another poster is both comforting and yet questionable.
Remember - she is and has been a public figure with rights and permissions for years (almost 40) and public perceptions do change. BTW - what classification might that be, that is perceived as ______? Is being a model, not a _____star offensive?
Yeah, it only gets better, right?I'm fairly certain she subscribes to the other magazine... not that there's anything wrong with that