Wait a second. We haven't sucked forever? I mean. What is our program's overall record? When you barely make bowl games and very rarely have good teams at a program, in the entirety of its history. Then that means we've sucked forever. That is not a lie. You sir are just in denial if you don't think UK football has always sucked. Yes I understand we have a good team every 15-20 years. That's why the good teams are considered the outlier, because we usually suck.We have not "sucked forever". I take personal offense at that lie. Coach Claiborne would have set you straight. "All is not well" with UK fans either. That's another insulting lie. You say we should kick dogshit out of Vandy every year. Vandy's fans think the Commodores should kick dogshit out of Kentucky every year. But that's just noise. The only thing that matters is the direction and arch of the program. Our football program is presently at a crossroad. We have sat at roughly the same performance level in 2014, 15, 16. With 19 incumbent starters and both kickers coming back in 2017, next year "should" be Stoops' time to break out. If he can do it, he will stay. If he can't do it, then he is a goner. I think it has become that simple. If that isn't good enough for you, it's your business. But at least stop posting lies.
This game was also 4 interceptions drops away from a loss.
It truely isn't. It's an honest question just because I think that the poster I replied to made some good points. I see many on here unhappy and I think it's absolutely justified. But many of the same people complaining and wanting Stoops gone are the same that claim these unattainable records at the beginning of the year. I just find it interesting that there is this notion that 4 or 5 wins saves Stoops's job but many feel that it's only going to get him to next year where he is ultimately going to get fired. What I am saying or asking (because I've seen it enough) is will those same people then turn around and claim 9-3 with a butt kicking of UofL going to happen again? I am just curious as to what others think.I don't know, kind of seems like a trolling post. I just can't know...
It truely isn't. It's an honest question just because I think that the poster I replied to made some good points. I see many on here unhappy and I think it's absolutely justified. But many of the same people complaining and wanting Stoops gone are the same that claim these unattainable records at the beginning of the year. I just find it interesting that there is this notion that 4 or 5 wins saves Stoops's job but many feel that it's only going to get him to next year where he is ultimately going to get fired. What I am saying or asking (because I've seen it enough) is will those same people then turn around and claim 9-3 with a butt kicking of UofL going to happen again? I am just curious as to what others think.
It truely isn't. It's an honest question just because I think that the poster I replied to made some good points. I see many on here unhappy and I think it's absolutely justified. But many of the same people complaining and wanting Stoops gone are the same that claim these unattainable records at the beginning of the year. I just find it interesting that there is this notion that 4 or 5 wins saves Stoops's job but many feel that it's only going to get him to next year where he is ultimately going to get fired. What I am saying or asking (because I've seen it enough) is will those same people then turn around and claim 9-3 with a butt kicking of UofL going to happen again? I am just curious as to what others think.
The point was Vandy lost their league leading rushing RB and dropped 4 interceptions, we were very lucky to win.And Southern Miss was a loss because of UK dropped INT, what's your point