Not only are degrees overrated but the school it’s from is as wellSlash academic depts and budgets (PSU just did).
Most colleges are overrated and degrees are losing their juice. Lots of junk degrees and redundancy
Need something like the land grant program in 1800s that filled a need for ag and industry people. Now colleges are closing and there is a need to teach skills which are dwindling when you chase males out of colleges and massively overcharge students.
I'm not impressed with medical schools either since we know people have been poisoned with industries that pay for any study they need. For decades they told people with diabetes to focus on grains and cut down on meat. Truck loads of amputations, blindness, kidney disease etc. Domestic Surgeons are great mechanics though.
Back when Harvard was still good they threw shade at the pyramid but that was rare 20 years ago.
"In the wild, animals instinctively find and consume the foods best adapted to their bodies. Not so for humans. Agribusinesses, fast-food chains, and calorie merchants assail the consumer with edible products designed to maximize revenue, not health. The result is a plague of nutrition-related illness: obesity, diabetes, heart disease, cancer. And contradictory nutritional guidance from popular books and scientific researchers only intensifies our confusion about what to eat."
Demolish the Food Pyramid
Demolish the Food Pyramid | Harvard Magazine
In the wild, animals instinctively find and consume the foods best adapted to their bodies. Not so for humans. Agribusinesses, fast-food chains...www.harvardmagazine.com
More sports.
Not me, I want Rutgers Football Players to get perfect grades and I hope Schiano feels the same and proves it by meeting all the players Professors on the sly , demanding they give his players the top grades , even if they deservedSo far I’m shocked at the vote. I’ll tell you how I voted. I want to win and yes I’ll trade winning for lower average student SAT scores!
Say hello Kyle FloodNot me, I want Rutgers Football Players to get perfect grades and I hope Schiano feels the same and proves it by meeting all the players Professors on the sly , demanding they give his players the top grades , even if they deserved
frowny faces on their test papers
View attachment 1485161![]()
Not me, I want Rutgers Football Players to get perfect grades and I hope Schiano feels the same and proves it by meeting all the players Professors on the sly , demanding they give his players the top grades , even if they deserved
frowny faces on their test papers
View attachment 1485161![]()
many people really don't understand how the school was toward student athletes.Mike McMahon said it about 27-28 years ago:
"They expect us to be Harvard Monday through Friday and Ohio St. on Saturday."
But that's not what this poll is asking.I don't pay to watch a Physics or English class. Just like a rising tide, successful athletics programs and the PR that comes with that does the same thing.
Well Ohio state is Ohio state 7 days a week. So is Michigan. Both very good institutionsMike McMahon said it about 27-28 years ago:
"They expect us to be Harvard Monday through Friday and Ohio St. on Saturday."
I am the OP and I am not positing anything. I’m trying to gauge what people care more about.But that's not what this poll is asking.
You are correct that for decades, the primary rationale for increased athletic emphasis is that it benefited the university as a whole. Athletics was presented as a means to an end. We can and should enjoy excellence in both.
The poll challenges that assumption. This poll posits that we cannot have excellence in both. We can only have one. So pick one.
I would have thought that this poll would have run about 75-25 in favor of academics, with the 25 composed primarily of non-alums like myself. (I voted for academics.) TBH I am gobsmacked that an alum would choose athletics over academics.
I guess the spirit of Cardale Jones is alive and well.
7-5 to 9-3 consistently and occasionally is a huge step up from who we’ve been for the last 50 years save a short stretch under GS1.0.I voted for academics. Three in our family have had highly successful careers as Rutgers computer science and engineering graduates. I would like Rutgers to do well in athletics, and by doing well, respectable is fine with me. 7-5 to 9-3 seasons in football, with an occasional 10 win season, and making the tourney in men's and women's hoops every couple or few years. Just don't see Rutgers rising to the level of Ohio State, Michigan, etc in athletics. It's not that important to us, which is why we have given far more to academics than athletics.
Not only are degrees overrated but the school it’s from is as well
I use like 2% of what I learned in school
but my son is an EE and he is learning why things work they way they do where work teaches you the what and how and he does think knowing the why is helpful but that’s his major
my degree is virtually useless
Cardale Jones and UNC won. Pay attention, Doc. Were any football or basketball players deemed academically ineligible in all of Division 1 last year?I guess the spirit of Cardale Jones is alive and well.
The bolded has already happened.7-5 to 9-3 consistently and occasionally is a huge step up from who we’ve been for the last 50 years save a short stretch under GS1.0.
I just don’t see it happening in the B1G. Too much competition.
I think we can get to 6-7 wins consistently with a better coach as that only requires 3-4 conf wins if we can sweep out of conference.
* But once we get the better coach and has several good seasons in a row, I fear we lose him to a bigger program and we go back to where we are now.
People said this when I was at RU in the mid '80s. It was Nebraska then.Mike McMahon said it about 27-28 years ago:
"They expect us to be Harvard Monday through Friday and Ohio St. on Saturday."
And you personally care how good Rutgers academics are? I don’t. I mean I’d prefer we be very good but if we slip it doesn’t affect me at all. I graduated a long time ago.There’s ebb and flow with athletics. Not long ago Wisconsin had both going for it. Vanderbilt caught lightning in a bottle with Pavia. For most schools, top athletics are hard to sustain. So, why try ? Why break the bank for temporary success ?
Why keep $ rebuilding a house in a flood zone? To enjoy 3 dry months ?
Academics is sustainable. Development lasts. And it’s what higher education is supposed to be about.
Shelby votes academics.
Why would it depress you ? You have nothing to do with the failures. By the same token, successful athletics shouldn’t be a source of pride. Have pride in your own successes, your kids’, etc. Have pride in what matters personally.And you personally care how good Rutgers academics are? I don’t. I mean I’d prefer we be very good but if we slip it doesn’t affect me at all. I graduated a long time ago.
but my fandom , even if depressing, is real and I want to win! Tired of losing is almost all sports most seasons
Vandy is good in some sports like baseball and has def has more success than RU overall across their AD but Vandy is an elite academic school like NW. they are clearly way above RU- the Ivy of the south basically
Wisky too has had much much more success than RU and is arguably a bit above us academcially. basketball has been in the NCAA’s most years, football has been to way bigger bowl games and ranked several years, wrestling is better so they actually are a pretty good model of success on both fronts
The Knight Report
Rutgers Baseball Transfer Portal Profile: RHP Luke Billings
The Knight Report
Join The Knight Report TODAY and get it for 60% off!
On3 Football
ESPN updates FPI rankings for each Big Ten football team after Week 6
The Knight Report Football
College Football 27 Sim - Rutgers Football versus Maryland Terrapins
The Knight Report
Rutgers Football Wednesday Injury Report: Latest Updates ahead of the Maryland game