Wonder why

Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
the POTUS hasn’t complimented the work of the DOJ on the indictment of 13 Russians? Seems odd, doesn’t it? You would think the POTUS would be happy an investigation is getting to the bottom of the interference of our democracy by Russians.

Wonder why the POTUS hasn’t imposed the sanctions on Russia that the Congress voted 517-5 in favor of?

What will be interesting to see in the coming days is the reaction of Republican members of Congress.
 
Last edited:

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
the POTUS hasn’t complimented the work of the DOJ on the indictment of 13 Russians? Seems odd, doesn’t it? You would think the POTUS would be happy an investigation is getting to the bottom of the interference of our democracy by Russians.

Wonder why the POTUS hasn’t imposed the sanctions on Russia that the Congress voted 517-5 in favor of?

What will be interesting to we in the coming days is the reaction of Republican members of Congress.

yes, 13 botmakers indicted that will never see the courtroom. Great work! How much money is he spending?
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
816
113
the POTUS hasn’t complimented the work of the DOJ on the indictment of 13 Russians? Seems odd, doesn’t it? You would think the POTUS would be happy an investigation is getting to the bottom of the interference of our democracy by Russians.

Wonder why the POTUS hasn’t imposed the sanctions on Russia that the Congress voted 517-5 in favor of?

What will be interesting to we in the coming days is the reaction of Republican members of Congress.
Why only indict 13 Russians? Why not 13k?
 

EEResistable

All-American
May 29, 2001
89,608
6,158
61
the POTUS hasn’t complimented the work of the DOJ on the indictment of 13 Russians? Seems odd, doesn’t it? You would think the POTUS would be happy an investigation is getting to the bottom of the interference of our democracy by Russians.

Wonder why the POTUS hasn’t imposed the sanctions on Russia that the Congress voted 517-5 in favor of?

What will be interesting to we in the coming days is the reaction of Republican members of Congress.

Lol. Let it go.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
the POTUS hasn’t complimented the work of the DOJ on the indictment of 13 Russians? Seems odd, doesn’t it? You would think the POTUS would be happy an investigation is getting to the bottom of the interference of our democracy by Russians.

Wonder why the POTUS hasn’t imposed the sanctions on Russia that the Congress voted 517-5 in favor of?

What will be interesting to we in the coming days is the reaction of Republican members of Congress.
Very good point
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
I thought you were for the investigation into what Russia did and how? No?

Still waiting on it. Press knew everything but the names of these Russians months ago, and they will never again be on American soil. Facebook VP said most of their influence after the election, and that was their testimony.

Still not much meat to Russian influence into our election. You know, like fake propaganda being injected into our press. That would satisfy the parameters.
 
Last edited:

Brushy Bill

Hall of Famer
Mar 31, 2009
61,155
129,090
113
You people are doing this thread all wrong.

Wonder why kkkuntry doesn't take a break from posting while he's on his period?
 

Brushy Bill

Hall of Famer
Mar 31, 2009
61,155
129,090
113
Wonder why MWV runs away like a little girl when he's challenged with facts?
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
Still waiting on it. Press knew everything but the names of these Russians months ago, and they will never again be on American soil. Facebook VP said most of their influence after the election, and that was their testimony.

Still not much meat to Russian influence into our election. You know, like fake propaganda being injected into our press. That would satisfy the parameters.
You have no idea what information Mueller has compiled, is in the process of compiling, and will compile over the course of the investigation
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
You have no idea what information Mueller has compiled, is in the process of compiling, and will compile over the course of the investigation

A year in and, much ado about nothing. I'm not going to hold my breath.

Edit: Wait, I'm holding my breath for Michael Moore to get arrested.
 

WVU82_rivals

Senior
May 29, 2001
199,091
693
0
 

boomerwv

Freshman
Jan 16, 2008
9,988
79
48
A year in and, much ado about nothing. I'm not going to hold my breath.

Edit: Wait, I'm holding my breath for Michael Moore to get arrested.

A year isn't very long for this type of thing. Didn't Ken Starr being investigating Whitewater in 1994, released his report in 98, and then the investigation continued until into 2001?
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
A year isn't very long for this type of thing. Didn't Ken Starr being investigating Whitewater in 1994, released his report in 98, and then the investigation continued until into 2001?

Lib types keep going back to the 90's, but the feds didn't keep every phone call, text, and message back then. It's a different world. Flynn's might just be thrown out, and Gates is going to rat on Manafort, possibly Podesta. Tell me again how this is President Trump conspiring with Russians to win the election?
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
816
113
A year isn't very long for this type of thing. Didn't Ken Starr being investigating Whitewater in 1994, released his report in 98, and then the investigation continued until into 2001?
If only this was relevant.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
Lib types keep going back to the 90's, but the feds didn't keep every phone call, text, and message back then. It's a different world. Flynn's might just be thrown out, and Gates is going to rat on Manafort, possibly Podesta. Tell me again how this is President Trump conspiring with Russians to win the election?
I’m not saying your wrong about there being nothing there, because I don’t know. But man, I’m going to hound the **** out of you if something’s found. You’ve been bitching about this investigation since it began....and you say you like Pence more
 

boomerwv

Freshman
Jan 16, 2008
9,988
79
48
Lib types keep going back to the 90's, but the feds didn't keep every phone call, text, and message back then. It's a different world. Flynn's might just be thrown out, and Gates is going to rat on Manafort, possibly Podesta. Tell me again how this is President Trump conspiring with Russians to win the election?

I am just saying that there isn't any reason to believe that this investigation will end any time soon. I also wouldnt count on that Flynn plea changing.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
I’m not saying your wrong about there being nothing there, because I don’t know. But man, I’m going to hound the **** out of you if something’s found. You’ve been bitching about this investigation since it began....and you say you like Pence more

I do. It's a political play, pure and simple. Libs could not stand the thought that a horrible candidate like Trump could beat Hillbag and their message.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
I do. It's a political play, pure and simple. Libs could not stand the thought that a horrible candidate like Trump could beat Hillbag and their message.
I think that narrative is plausible. But I think there are many more factors that created the legitimacy of an investigation. GOP Congressmen seem to think it so too.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
Lib types keep going back to the 90's, but the feds didn't keep every phone call, text, and message back then. It's a different world. Flynn's might just be thrown out, and Gates is going to rat on Manafort, possibly Podesta. Tell me again how this is President Trump conspiring with Russians to win the election?

Good call!
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
More evidence the public school system has failed the American tax payer. Again, more evidence certain threads entertainment value increases with age.
So you’re saying it’s good the President doesn’t openly praise the DOJ’s / SC’s work identifying the Russian apparatus involved in attempting to sow discord in the US electorate?

Or are you just barking at the noises again like usual?