Wow.....

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
816
113
Uh....seriously? Some of those underage girls accused him (Dershowitz) of banging them, no?
They wont actually make the claims. He has asked they put it their claims in writing. So far just random people on the internet claiming these girls accused him.
 

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,556
40
31
They wont actually make the claims. He has asked they put it their claims in writing. So far just random people on the internet claiming these girls accused him.
According to a recent court transcript, among those people Ransome claims she was directed to have sex with was Epstein’s lawyer, Alan Dershowitz, who helped negotiate a controversial plea deal that gave the eccentric multimillionaire — and co-conspirators employed by Epstein — federal immunity in 2008.

Claims were made in court.
 

JWG66

All-Conference
Dec 31, 2013
13,062
1,569
113
Isn't Dershowitz involved with that child rapist Epstein along with that Trump admin official? I'd keep him off the airwaves if I was any "News" network.

CNN is not a news network. They are spewing opinions not news. Maybe they should bring Avenatti back for his take on the Mueller report. He is a real credible source of legal issues.
 
Jan 4, 2003
44,736
536
103
They “banned” him from the airwaves? Maybe they feel like, liberal or not, Dershowitz is an attention ***** and really weren’t interested in his point of view. I know I can’t stand the jag, ever since he whored himself out for OJ.
if AD is an attention ***** then who are pocahantas,maxine,corey,kamala,beto...etcetcetc.........damn boom....I never thought TDS or AOCD would affect you...thought you got vaccinated...guess I was wrong
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
282
83
CNN is not a news network. They are spewing opinions not news. Maybe they should bring Avenatti back for his take on the Mueller report. He is a real credible source of legal issues.
News and opinion, wow it's all so confusing. I had no idea that people were struggling so. lol smh
 

eerdoc

Redshirt
May 29, 2001
24,014
26
48
He’s not a Trump homer. He’s a liberal legal scholar who apparently knows a **** load more about the law than anything parroted on the Pravdaesque networks you watch. He maintained true to his integrity of knowledge during the entirety of this ordeal and he was 100% spot on correct.
He was scheduled to write a summary of the Mueller report to be released with the report. Wonder if that is still the plan. He also has said that any report such as the one from Mueller presents only one side of the discussion and it is general practice that the other side (Trump) write a companion piece to be released simultaneously. This flies in the face of the Dems who have proclaimed that Trump and his attorneys should not be given a preliminary copy that would allow this equal opportunity for the public. More trying to restrict normal legal operations by Schumer and other Dems. The professor is a Libertarian an voted for Hillary. However he is unquestionably honest and knows his law. He has spoken against impeaching Trump and written a best seller regarding that subject.) He speaks truth while not preaching conservative, Republican, Democrat or Liberal doctrine. He should be listened to by ALL sides. CNN has ceased to allow him to appear because he is not one to preach the twisted truths they insist for their network.
 
Last edited:

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
282
83
He was scheduled to write a summary of he Mueller report to be released when with the report. Wonder if that is still the plan/ Also said that any report such as the one from Mueller presents only one side of the discussion and it is general practice that the other side (Trump) write a companion piece to be released simultaneously. This flies in the face of the Dems who have proclaimed that Trump and his attorneys should not be given a preliminary copy that would allow this equal opportunity for the public. More trying to restrict normal legal operations by Schumer and other Dems.
lol good stuff
 

mule_eer

Freshman
May 6, 2002
20,439
59
48
I don’t think you get to dictate the point.
What? I made a point, and you missed it. I get to dictate what my own point is.

I'll spell it out. Investigations are used to find evidence. Saying that there wasn't enough evidence for the investigation after the investigation doesn't turn up enough evidence to indict is using hindsight. Also, Trump denied outright several things that we now know to be true after the investigation. The point there is that if you are lying about things that might look fishy, you are going to make people think you might be hiding something. In some cases they may choose to investigate things to see if you are hiding something.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
News and opinion, wow it's all so confusing. I had no idea that people were struggling so. lol smh

They have run propaganda nearly 24X7 for 2 years. They're not investigative, you know. It's bad when that National Enquirer has a better track record than you.
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
282
83
They have run propaganda nearly 24X7 for 2 years. They're not investigative, you know. It's bad when that National Enquirer has a better track record than you.
lol keep 'em coming. Doesn't it sucking admiring a so called prez who disses our allies and sucks up to every dictator he can find? Perhaps if he didn't do some of the stupid sh*t then everyone and their brother wouldn't be standing in line to investigate him and cable news pundits wouldn't be theorizing about the same issues.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,230
3,298
113
What? I made a point, and you missed it. I get to dictate what my own point is.

I'll spell it out. Investigations are used to find evidence. Saying that there wasn't enough evidence for the investigation after the investigation doesn't turn up enough evidence to indict is using hindsight. Also, Trump denied outright several things that we now know to be true after the investigation. The point there is that if you are lying about things that might look fishy, you are going to make people think you might be hiding something. In some cases they may choose to investigate things to see if you are hiding something.
I didn’t miss it. This was kicked off because of an Isikoff article validating the Dossier which was used as the basis along with the Isikoff article for the FISA app. Spin history as much as you like, this is reality.
 

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,556
40
31
I didn’t miss it. This was kicked off because of an Isikoff article validating the Dossier which was used as the basis along with the Isikoff article for the FISA app. Spin history as much as you like, this is reality.
lol. No it's not. Release the FISA apps
 

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,556
40
31
You sure? Cause then it’s definitive what it says, no more assumptions.

What’s the hold up now? It was the midterms, then the Mueller Report.
Huber report. Now THE is already saying that even though these treasonous bastards are super, super guilty....many Republicans are ready to let them off and move forward. That will be the new nonsense.

But they totally were guilty.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
Huber report. Now THE is already saying that even though these treasonous bastards are super, super guilty....many Republicans are ready to let them off and move forward. That will be the new nonsense.

But they totally were guilty.

You want my feelings on it? That's totally different than a prediction. The bastards should hang.
 

mule_eer

Freshman
May 6, 2002
20,439
59
48
I didn’t miss it. This was kicked off because of an Isikoff article validating the Dossier which was used as the basis along with the Isikoff article for the FISA app. Spin history as much as you like, this is reality.
That's a theory, but you have no real idea if that's the case.
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
282
83
No. I'm not going to put my name to X number of indictments, and then you all say I was wrong because it was missing three
That would not happen because you're the only one that cares what gets said on this board past the day it was said....keep creeping those old threads.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
That would not happen because you're the only one that cares what gets said on this board past the day it was said....keep creeping those old threads.

Ok, I'll creep on myself in a while then.

Strzok, McCabe, Comey, and Lynch at a minimum will be indicted.