wvu2007 has resorted to bumping up ancient threads to get attention

PriddyBoy

Junior
May 29, 2001
17,174
282
0
Sep,'16 and Aug,'15?

lmao.... you freakin nutjob
 

mneilmont

Sophomore
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
The OP is not a very fast learner. Dave can easily prove who is more enlightened using these historical posts as evidence. He doesn't have to rely on trying to be a bad *** with his vernacular downing the opposition. Simply point to these old posts and smile. Dave is far ahead of the Hillary supporters who were arrogantly making guarantees that most knew were asinine from the start.
 

old buzzard

Senior
Dec 30, 2005
6,252
553
113
Sep,'16 and Aug,'15?

lmao.... you freakin nutjob

Funny as hell reading all those old threads. Libs thought there was no way Hillary could lose. Not surprised that you libtards don't like your crow served cold. Maybe next time you will offer a candidate that has something to offer other than it's her turn.
 
Last edited:

wvu2007

Senior
Jan 2, 2013
21,220
457
0
Funny as hell reading all those old threads. Libs though there was no way Hillary could lose. Not surprised that you libtards don't like your crow served cold. Maybe next time you will offer a candidate that has something to offer other than it's her turn.

It seems like I find a new old thread everyday with them claiming a sure win by Hillary.
 

American Fabius

Redshirt
May 21, 2017
246
0
0
Funny as hell reading all those old threads. Libs though there was no way Hillary could lose. Not surprised that you libtards don't like your crow served cold. Maybe next time you will offer a candidate that has something to offer other than it's her turn.
It has nothing to do with your childish glee of constantly talking ****. It's all about your obsessive distraction of an old woman whose retired but still in your head. That's more than a little strange folks. I mean, I get that you throw **** on walls hoping to drive the normal people from your wingnut "safe zone", but using a retired old lady to beat up on, so no one looks at your POS dear supreme leaders many failures? lol Really? C'mon. Can't you at least TRY being relevant?
 

wvu2007

Senior
Jan 2, 2013
21,220
457
0
Funny as hell reading all those old threads. Libs though there was no way Hillary could lose. Not surprised that you libtards don't like your crow served cold. Maybe next time you will offer a candidate that has something to offer other than it's her turn.
It has nothing to do with your childish glee of constantly talking ****. It's all about your obsessive distraction of an old woman whose retired but still in your head. That's more than a little strange folks. I mean, I get that you throw **** on walls hoping to drive the normal people from your wingnut "safe zone", but using a retired old lady to beat up on, so no one looks at your POS dear supreme leaders many failures? lol Really? C'mon. Can't you at least TRY being relevant?

Triggered