Adam Silver's comments about the one-and-done are (again) off-base and uninformed

My goodness, stop it. Silver just twisted that argument so much I need to see a chiropractor after reading it twice. Understand that Simmons and Fultz aren’t part of a “sea of change” but are instead unique outliers. Simmons ended up at LSU because his Godfather coached there, and Fultz ended up at Washington because they recruited him before he blossomed into a five-star prodigy. Saying they’re part of a “sea of change” would be like me saying that Dirk Nowitzki is part of a “sea of change,” and from now on all the NBA’s best scorers will be 7’0 foot Germans. Stop! It makes no sense. Also, why is that a legitimate argument to remove the rule anyway? If Simmons and Fultz had gone to Duke and Kentucky instead of LSU and Washington, would that be reason to reconsider? If Lonzo Ball or Brandon Ingram went No. 1 in their respective drafts (instead of Fultz and Simmons) would the change not be necessary? By the way, I love how Silver mentions that Fultz went No. 1 overall from a non-traditional power, without mentioning that picks No. 2-5 (Ball, Jayson Tatum, Josh Jackson and De’Aaron Fox) in last year’s draft went to arguably the four most successful college basketball programs of all-time. Forget sea of change. I’m drowning right now in Silver’s sea of lies. But then, Silver really doubles down on the hyperbole. And this is the part that makes me the most upset. Again, citing Simmons and Fultz as examples (instead of countless others that would make his point moot) Silver discusses how the college game isn’t properly preparing guys for the NBA.“What’s really interesting to me is the last two No. 1 picks in the NBA draft, Ben Simmons two years ago and Markelle Fultz last year, both played with teams that did not make the NCAA tournament. And I think not enough people are talking about that. That seems to be a sea change in the development of players coming into the NBA.
“From our standpoint, if the players in that one year of college aren’t getting the kind of development we’d like to see them get coming into the NBA, aren’t playing in the NCAA tournament, aren’t competing against top-notch competition, I think we have to take a step back and figure out whether we are better off taking those players at a younger age and working on their training and development full time.”First off, who is to say that they aren’t getting developed? I seem to remember Karl Anthony Towns averaging 18 and 10 as a rookie two years ago. Did the Kentucky staff have no part in that? I also seem to notice that Ben Simmons is one of the favorites to win Rookie of the Year this year, even despite the fact that he sat out all of last season. Hmm, must be all that “developing” he did while sitting on the bench and rehabbing last year, and nothing to do with what happened at LSU. https://twitter.com/Aaron_Torres/status/920315472133857280 And by the way, who is saying that if the NBA gets their hands on these players at a younger age they will develop them better than the college game? Sure, there are some developmental success stories (Thon Maker and Skal Labissiere last year for example) but there are just as many flops too. How did Anthony Bennett do in the NBA’s developmental system? How about Noah Vonleh? Remember him? What about Jahlil Okafor? Couldn’t I argue that Coach K did more to develop him in nine months at Duke (assuming Okafor still came to practice after the first semester anyway) than the NBA has in three years? I think I could. As a matter of fact, you know what the most ironic part of Silver’s comments are? Most of the NBA’s best players were…. wait for it… DEVELOPED IN COLLEGE!!!! Sure there are the one-and-done guys like Kevin Durant, John Wall and Kyrie Irving. But what everyone else? Steph Curry was a skinny gunner coming out of high school and developed into a lottery pick at Davidson. Same with Klay Thompson at Washington State. Kawhi Leonard developed into a two-way monster at San Diego State, and Kemba Walker and Isaiah Thomas developed into stone-cold killers at UConn and Washington respectively. Paul George developed from a tools-y high school player to a first rounder at Fresno State and Jimmy Butler a tools-y junior college player to NBA first rounder at Marquette. And I haven’t even mentioned Russell Westbrook (two years at UCLA), Draymond Green (four at Michigan State) or Damian Lillard either. All of those guys have been All-Stars within the last few years, and — I hate to tell Adam Silver this — it didn’t happen because of the NBA’s magical developmental powers. The foundation was set in college and evolved throughout their time in the NBA. Anyway, I could go on and on, but I’ll stop here. There’s no reason to discuss further, or dig deeper. Look, if Adam Silver wants to remove the one-and-done, fine. But he needs to stop making up lies to make it happen. Basketball fans — both in college and the NBA — deserve the truth. Not some twisted, distorted version of it. Aaron Torres is covering basketball for KSR this season after four years at Fox Sports. Follow him on Twitter @Aaron_Torres or e-mail at [email protected]. He is also the author of the only book written on the Calipari era, “One and Fun: A Behind the Scenes Look at John Calipari and the 2010 Kentucky Wildcats.” [mobile_ad]
Discuss This Article
Comments have moved.
Join the conversation and talk about this article and all things Kentucky Sports in the new KSR Message Board.
KSBoard