Republican states wouldn't have to provide bus service.While I agree for the most part, we know what would happen. The Republican states would provide zero assistance other than a bus service to ship poor people to democrat states.
Republican states wouldn't have to provide bus service.While I agree for the most part, we know what would happen. The Republican states would provide zero assistance other than a bus service to ship poor people to democrat states.
But maga is anything but the party of small federal govt. and I’m not terrified of Black and Brown people or people from other countries. Only pu$$ies are maga.Talk dirty to me @Rastafarian . You are closet MAGA you just don't know it.
There are different type of lobbyists but the most impactful ones work for say: Blue Cross Blue Shield, who lobby senators and representatives to vote no on social programs that weaken their bottom line.what is it exactly that you think lobbyists do? I was one, and I'm trying to reconcile my activities with what you think they are...
Republican states wouldn't have to provide bus service.
Let’s say it is. Giving your own money requires sacrifice, giving others money only requires filling in a bubble on a ballot (or ten ballets if you live in certain places).Image looks like a lot of tithing to me.
What a beautiful tribute to your mom, and also to your dad as well. You do them proud.
Excellent!
Water is essentially free. It’s most of what my children drink. Other than milk, what other drink should be paid for by a nutrition program? Certainly not soda, and really not even juices, which are unhealthy and full of sugar.
Hope they continue to streamline SNAP eligible items. Turn it into an actual nutrition program as the name suggests.
OK, I understand..but let's start with one basic...no lobbyist has a vote in the Senate....now having agreed on that, you've identified one side of the debate the provider - blue cross - (I understand you're using this only as an example), but you didn't mention all of the patient based organizations that have lobbyists and lobby the same senators on the other side of whatever the issue is. Look it up....lobbyists provide their side of the issue...and for every one that argues "yes", there is another that argues "no".There are different type of lobbyists but the most impactful ones work for say: Blue Cross Blue Shield, who lobby senators and representatives to vote no on social programs that weaken their bottom line.
Currently we have an 80 year old fraudulent businessman who's enriching himself & his family at a rate never seen while adding staggeringly to the debt. I'd rather have a 10 year old.I disagree. Do you let your 10 year old tell you how to manage your finances at home? Does any sane person manage their personal finances by allowing people that don’t contribute to their finances to tell them how to spend their money.
don't they give tax breaks to you also....What about when “christians” use our tax dollars to give tax breaks to corporations?
I reject that assertion as they are false equivalents. I neither have the time nor the patience to go through all the reasons “Christians” tithe. What I can say is that people tithe for a variety of reasons. Yes, the end result is separating dollars from yourself but let’s not pretend the motives are always so selfless and pure. That’s naive.Let’s say it is. Giving your own money requires sacrifice, giving others money only requires filling in a bubble on a ballot (or ten ballets if you live in certain places).
For someone that tries to claim educational/moral superiority over every one else HEADgiver, you're not smart at all.Cool so you hate democracy.
I usually find that libertarians and right wingers do. They prefer authoritarianism. But many deny or don't understand that thats what they are arguing for.
Obviously you hate democracy then. You allow poor people in your state to have a voice.This is exactly why senators and congressional members from welfare states like South Carolina should not be allowed to vote on any bills. Those of us who are bankrolling those ****** welfare states are tired of it, and we feel like we should have more say in what happens in the country. And I don't care which citizens in your state are driving your state to be a welfare state. That's irrelevant. Manage your **** better, and maybe we'll give you a voice again.
I love this idea.
"and fund education" Where TF has that gotten us? A bunch of children that can't read or write while billions are spent.Then stop falling for political tactics and fund education. Fund the IRS to investigate tax fraud, fund the government to find medicaid, SNAP, SS and medicare fraud.
Because you hating someone abusing the system, is making you blind to the good the system does.
As a general rule, the people who speak most about a topic know the least about it regardless of the subject.what is it exactly that you think lobbyists do? I was one, and I'm trying to reconcile my activities with what you think they are...
Can you expound on this? As long as I've been allowed to vote, I can't remember ever voting for a "christian". Can you show me a ballot where the "christian" party was on it and the votes the candidate received?What about when “christians” use our tax dollars to give tax breaks to corporations?
You have never even given a set of old shoes to the Salvation Army. Those are the facts.I reject that assertion as they are false equivalents. I neither have the time nor the patience to go through all the reasons “Christians” tithe. What I can say is that people tithe for a variety of reasons. Yes, the end result is separating dollars from yourself but let’s not pretend the motives are always so selfless and pure. That’s naive.
Interesting because many on the right make that their identityCan you expound on this? As long as I've been allowed to vote, I can't remember ever voting for a "christian". Can you show me a ballot where the "christian" party was on it and the votes the candidate received?
Wut? Feel free to try and make this make sense in the context of the broader conversation.You have never even given a set of old shoes to the Salvation Army. Those are the facts.
You can’t have small government when 51% are getting handouts genius. I’m terrified of lazy *** people that don’t contribute. They can be any color. Only virtuous dumb fvcks are liberals.But maga is anything but the party of small federal govt. and I’m not terrified of Black and Brown people or people from other countries. Only pu$$ies are maga.
Great post.You can’t have small government when 51% are getting handouts genius. I’m terrified of lazy *** people that don’t contribute. They can be any color. Only virtuous dumb fvcks are liberals.
Thank you commie. Hope you’re doing well.Great post.
12% !!!!
Does this requirement apply to farm aid, corporate subsidies, tariff relief payments, etc?Insane. It should be exceptionally difficult to get taxpayer funds unless you have a significant mental or physical disability, or are elderly. If you want free money that was taken from your hardworking American neighbors, there should be a lengthy application process and you should have to prove why you cannot provide for your family. It should be a last resort.
Does this requirement apply to farm aid, corporate subsidies, tariff relief payments, etc?
Curious how old you areSure, but obviously the criteria are very different. And there are legitimate economic reasons for some. Farm subsidies, for example, are probably necessary but need to be looked at for reform, proper incentives, etc.
Individual government dependence is quite different. There’s nothing good about a perfectly healthy and competent person relying on the government for basic needs. That’s a failure by the individual and by our system for enabling it.
How old are you? You have also asked my age so let’s hear how old you are.Curious how old you are
Let’s be honest, there are a ton of people who make money who are not hardworking. And there are a ton of people who work very hard and make little money.Insane. It should be exceptionally difficult to get taxpayer funds unless you have a significant mental or physical disability, or are elderly. If you want free money that was taken from your hardworking American neighbors, there should be a lengthy application process and you should have to prove why you cannot provide for your family. It should be a last resort.
I agree in theory, but what would you say to the family in Orangeburg SC that has a terrible public school system and no ability to travel to any job other than minimum wage at a dollar general due to lack of public transportation?Sure, but obviously the criteria are very different. And there are legitimate economic reasons for some. Farm subsidies, for example, are probably necessary but need to be looked at for reform, proper incentives, etc.
Individual government dependence is quite different. There’s nothing good about a perfectly healthy and competent person relying on the government for basic needs. That’s a failure by the individual and by our system for enabling it.
I agree in theory, but what would you say to the family in Orangeburg SC that has a terrible public school system and no ability to travel to any job other than minimum wage at a dollar general due to lack of public transportation?
I agree in theory, but what would you say to the family in Orangeburg SC that has a terrible public school system and no ability to travel to any job other than minimum wage at a dollar general due to lack of public transportation?
Mid 50sHow old are you? You have also asked my age so let’s hear how old you are.
Let’s be honest, there are a ton of people who make money who are not hardworking. And there are a ton of people who work very hard and make little money.
Do you think you’ll hit a point financially where you are less bothered by this?Sure. Doesn’t mean the government should take from one and give to the other.
Do you think you’ll hit a point financially where you are less bothered by this?
Tiger Illustrated Football
Our final word on Clemson Football before kickoff
Tiger Illustrated Football
What we are thinking ahead of Clemson's sixth game of the season
Tiger Illustrated Football
A look under the surface of Clemson's offense
College Football Playoff
Could college football luck its way into a functional 24-team playoff after it did with 12?
Tiger Illustrated Football
Drilling down on Clemson Football's roster spend