If we are playing in the rain on Saturday

Feb 25, 2017
186
273
63
I swear, we have a lot of fans trying to get KT killed this year between calling for him to run all the time to calling for a rb who can’t pass block.
Calm down... No one is saying turn him in to Tebow, just simply asking if Lebby will throw in a few more run plays with a slippery field.
 

Boosh

Junior
Sep 14, 2017
301
345
63
The ankle isn't a big deal. He will be dealing with that hamstring for several more weeks.
I had an ankle injury in HS and it was the worst injury I had because it bothered me with every step. I wouldn't wish it on anyone. Even with heavy tape and Ibuprofen it was nagging and it took forever to go away.
 

gtowndawg

Senior
Jan 23, 2007
2,353
742
113
He really needs to run some but with the injury it's not going to happen. When teams no he can't run it makes things much harder.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog

horshack.sixpack

All-American
Oct 30, 2012
12,136
9,475
113
Calm down... No one is saying turn him in to Tebow, just simply asking if Lebby will throw in a few more run plays with a slippery field.
This is an even bigger reason why the answer is no. Unstable turf leads to slip/catch type injuries where the sudden stops does something really bad to ligaments and such.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog

Drebin

Heisman
Aug 22, 2012
22,523
27,491
113
I had an ankle injury in HS and it was the worst injury I had because it bothered me with every step. I wouldn't wish it on anyone. Even with heavy tape and Ibuprofen it was nagging and it took forever to go away.
There are degrees of ankle injuries. Probably half the players on the field at any given time have sore ankles. His ankle is fine and will be fine as long as it's not a high ankle sprain.
 

DoggieDaddy13

All-Conference
Dec 23, 2017
3,953
2,348
113
I hope to God Lebby plays this game smart and does whatever necessary to protect K1.

Nobody wants to see the Dawgs beat Bama more than I do.

But...

We don't need this game. The remainder of the schedule sets up VERY WELL for us. VERY WELL. We need to stay healthy so we can do the most damage possible. Our chances of winning in Red Stick and Austin are just as good if not better than beating Bama at home.

Keep K1 upright and healthy in this game. Then we get a week off to heal up and get ready for the final run to the playoffs.
 

Drebin

Heisman
Aug 22, 2012
22,523
27,491
113
I hope to God Lebby plays this game smart and does whatever necessary to protect K1.

Nobody wants to see the Dawgs beat Bama more than I do.

But...

We don't need this game. The remainder of the schedule sets up VERY WELL for us. VERY WELL. We need to stay healthy so we can do the most damage possible. Our chances of winning in Red Stick and Austin are just as good if not better than beating Bama at home.

Keep K1 upright and healthy in this game. Then we get a week off to heal up and get ready for the final run to the playoffs.
Play To Win New York Jets GIF
 

Darryl Steight

All-American
Sep 30, 2022
4,726
7,945
113
do you design more run plays for KT?
Definitely not against Bama's defense. That could derail the season. You do just what we've been doing - let him air it out to 2, 7, and 13, and get the DBs back as far off the LOS as you can. Then you hit underneath and seams to 24, 3 and 87, then K1 only runs when the pocket breaks down or to get a critical first down. Sorry to break into the Kang's speech, but I didn't feel like typing all the names.

Point is, I certainly wouldn't gameplan to get him hit more at this point, especially with difficult, but now-winnable, games coming up with LSU, OK, etc.
 

Drebin

Heisman
Aug 22, 2012
22,523
27,491
113
He was coaching the Jets for Christ's sake.

But even Hermie knows -

You play to get in the playoffs -

so you can win the championship.
So do you want to get to the playoffs and play Georgia in the first round, or do you want to get there and play Tulane in the first round?

If we're not playing to win, we're pusses.
 

dawgstudent

Heisman
Apr 15, 2003
40,526
22,322
113
No. No matter the climate you don't run KT more. He is a QB, and maybe the best one in the country. We have running backs (plural) that we can run and not risk losing our generational QB.
I do not know if we have plural running backs the way Bothwell is being used. Gayten must not do anything right because I still would like to see him get more touches.
 
Feb 25, 2017
186
273
63
So do you want to get to the playoffs and play Georgia in the first round, or do you want to get there and play Tulane in the first round?

If we're not playing to win, we're pusses.
That was kind of my thought starting this thread. I 100% agree that our season depends on KT staying healthy; however, he is going to get hit some whether you run him or not. I will also say I think he stands a bigger risk of getting hurt from a sack in the pocket versus a few runs and if we do not show the threat of him rushing Bama will bring the heat every time.
 

Drebin

Heisman
Aug 22, 2012
22,523
27,491
113
I do not know if we have plural running backs the way Bothwell is being used. Gayten must not do anything right because I still would like to see him get more touches.
Definitely need to get Fluff off the field more. Gayten is a curious case....I know he has had fumble issues before. Maybe he still shows that in practice so the coaches don't fully trust him. But he's pretty similar to Fluff and would be a good plug-in, with Wilson and JJ as change of pace guys.
 

horshack.sixpack

All-American
Oct 30, 2012
12,136
9,475
113
I do not know if we have plural running backs the way Bothwell is being used. Gayten must not do anything right because I still would like to see him get more touches.
I think we have several capable running backs. My primary concern would be the defense knowing that Fluff is the only one who can pass block (if that's true?) and being able to just load up against the run any time he isn't in there. What we really need is for one of the other backs to be serviceable in pass protection so that we can spell Fluff if needed and not lose the passing attack. I'm convinced of the other RBs running skill, assuming that they know how to follow blockers, find holes, etc. (i.e. know the playbook) and hoping at least one can pass block.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrontRangeDawg
Sep 26, 2012
1,345
910
113
I do not know if we have plural running backs the way Bothwell is being used. Gayten must not do anything right because I still would like to see him get more touches.
Gayten's lack of touches is a bit surprising, as I think he has the best speed of our RBs. Must really be a liability at pass pro.
 

Darryl Steight

All-American
Sep 30, 2022
4,726
7,945
113
I don't see 'not calling more designed runs' as a p*ssy move or anything... just being smart long-term at this point. I just don't see any reason for me (as a playcaller) to call for him to get tackled an extra 10-20 times, at least not this early in the season.

To me, it's just an unneccessary risk. You don't tell him not to run, you just call plays as usual - give the ball to Fluff, call passes like you've been doing - then if the pocket breaks, go get the first down young buck.

In my view, we are staring at a realistic chance of going 9-3 right now. Could be 10-2 and in the playoff discussion if we play our best against LSU. I just wouldn't derail that by running K1 a bunch this game just to prove how tough we are. If he gets hurt... where are we, 6-6 maybe? Not worth it.
 

Willow Grove Dawg

All-American
Nov 3, 2016
8,417
6,107
113
I had an ankle injury in HS and it was the worst injury I had because it bothered me with every step. I wouldn't wish it on anyone. Even with heavy tape and Ibuprofen it was nagging and it took forever to go away.
I hurt the same ankle multiple times playing high school basketball. I turned 60 in April & it still bothers me periodically.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darryl Steight
Feb 25, 2017
186
273
63
I don't see 'not calling more designed runs' as a p*ssy move or anything... just being smart long-term at this point. I just don't see any reason for me (as a playcaller) to call for him to get tackled an extra 10-20 times, at least not this early in the season.

To me, it's just an unneccessary risk. You don't tell him not to run, you just call plays as usual - give the ball to Fluff, call passes like you've been doing - then if the pocket breaks, go get the first down young buck.

In my view, we are staring at a realistic chance of going 9-3 right now. Could be 10-2 and in the playoff discussion if we play our best against LSU. I just wouldn't derail that by running K1 a bunch this game just to prove how tough we are. If he gets hurt... where are we, 6-6 maybe? Not worth it.
1790781583355.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Howiefeltersnstch

DoggieDaddy13

All-Conference
Dec 23, 2017
3,953
2,348
113
perhaps not, but i don't see us getting any healthier and having a better chance of beating a top 10 than on Saturday.
It would be terrific to beat 7 ranked Bama in Starkville. And our chances are good.

I hope K1 balls out. I just don't want to see him put at any greater risk than he already has been this season. You don't hook Secretariat to a plow. K1, if he has to run, should run sparingly and get down quick.

Our chances are better beating (hopefully still) #1 Texas in Austin.
 
Feb 25, 2017
186
273
63
It would be terrific to beat 7 ranked Bama in Starkville. And our chances are good.

I hope K1 balls out. I just don't want to see him put at any greater risk than he already has been this season. You don't hook Secretariat to a plow. K1, if he has to run, should run sparingly and get down quick.

Our chances are better beating (hopefully still) #1 Texas in Austin.
I don't know man, that Texas D has been pretty salty against better competition than Bama has seen.
 

Darryl Steight

All-American
Sep 30, 2022
4,726
7,945
113

I don't argue running can be safer than sitting in the pocket, all things being equal. But as has been mentioned - he's dinged up already. I just said I don't see any reason to guarantee he gets tackled 20 extra times in this game. Seems safer to me and a better long term decision to have him do what he's been doing. I guess we'll see if Lebby agrees with you on Saturday. Whichever way he goes, I hope he's right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DoggieDaddy13
Feb 25, 2017
186
273
63
I don't argue running can be safer than sitting in the pocket, all things being equal. But as has been mentioned - he's dinged up already. I just said I don't see any reason to guarantee he gets tackled 20 extra times in this game. Seems safer to me and a better long term decision to have him do what he's been doing. I guess we'll see if Lebby agrees with you on Saturday. Whichever way he goes, I hope he's right.

Definitely was not suggesting running him 20 times. I think in the right situation, in pivotal moments of the game, it could be advantageous to have a few plays designed to get him in the open field. Obviously if he is suffering from a hamstring injury or ankle its a mute point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darryl Steight
Maroon and White

Latest

  1. 01 Maroon and White Rapid Recap: No. 7 Alabama 56-23 No. 16 Mississippi State
  2. 02 Maroon and White Football Live Updates: Mississippi State vs. Alabama
  3. 03 Maroon and White Football Last Call: Week 5 Predictions for No. 16 Mississippi State vs. No. 7 Alabama
  4. 04 Maroon and White Football Mississippi State Keys to Victory against Alabama
  5. 05 Maroon and White No. 16 Mississippi State vs. No. 7 Alabama: How, where and when to watch the Bulldogs