Looks like Seth Trimble is now allowed to play for UL

UKFootball78 · Sep 3, 2026

Im

Cattorney said:
How does it not?

This is multiple years in a row where he has not been able to build a solid team and is scrambling in Sept to add someone. We are again the laughing stock of CBB and expected to underperform to our standards, yet again under Pope.

Is the court ruling directly Pope's fault? No!

Is being in the same situation yet again where we have struck out on practically every big name recruit we wanted and having a low ceiling team yet again Pope's fault? Hell yes!

Sorry, but you still provided no facts and only a few meaningless opinions. You are clearly here just to troll and failing.

Cattorney · Sep 3, 2026

UKFootball78 said:
Im

Sorry, but you still provided no facts and only a few meaningless opinions. You are clearly here just to troll and failing.

Feel free to counter them....if you can!

UKFootball78 · Sep 3, 2026

C

Cattorney said:
Feel free to counter them....if you can!

Counter what? You have given me no facts to be countered, just your desperate need for attention and worthless ignorant opinions

Cattorney · Sep 3, 2026

UKFootball78 said:
C

Counter what? You have given me no facts to be countered, just your desperate need for attention and worthless ignorant opinions

Sure I have.

This is multiple years in a row where he has not been able to build a solid team and is scrambling in Sept to add someone. We are again the laughing stock of CBB and expected to underperform to our standards, yet again under Pope.

All facts!

Is being in the same situation yet again where we have struck out on practically every big name recruit we wanted and having a low ceiling team yet again Pope's fault?

Again, facts!

Just being, like, I don't accept them as facts, therefore they aren't facts, doesn't negate what they are. It just makes you look inferior to arguing against them.

UKFootball78 · Sep 3, 2026

Cattorney said:
Sure I have.

This is multiple years in a row where he has not been able to build a solid team and is scrambling in Sept to add someone. We are again the laughing stock of CBB and expected to underperform to our standards, yet again under Pope.

All facts!

Is being in the same situation yet again where we have struck out on practically every big name recruit we wanted and having a low ceiling team yet again Pope's fault?

Again, facts!

Just being, like, I don't accept them as facts, therefore they aren't facts, doesn't negate what they are. It just makes you look inferior to arguing against them.

Those are not facts. This is the only year were he has tried to add someone in September. That is a fact. Being a laughing stock is your opinion...not a fact. All Other teams miss on players and big name recruits, UK doesn't have a monopoly on it. Having low ceiling...again...just your opinion, not fact.
Your whole counter- argument makes you look inferior to arguing against...well anything. If only you were as smart as you think you are and we were all as dumb as you think we are...then maybe you wouldn't be so inept at forming a solid argument that could be countered. BTW, look up the definitions of fact and opinion please. It would be a good starting point for you.

Cattorney · Sep 3, 2026

UKFootball78 said:
Those are not facts. This is the only year were he has tried to add someone in September. That is a fact. Being a laughing stock is your opinion...not a fact. All Other teams miss on players and big name recruits, UK doesn't have a monopoly on it. Having low ceiling...again...just your opinion, not fact.
Your whole counter- argument makes you look inferior to arguing against...well anything. If only you were as smart as you think you are and we were all as dumb as you think we are...then maybe you wouldn't be so inept at forming a solid argument that could be countered. BTW, look up the definitions of fact and opinion please. It would be a good starting point for you.

Except they are facts.

You sure about that? You sure we weren't interested in some international prospects late last year and the looking for another PG after Lowe was hurt because he forgot to recruit a backup prior to the season? You sure sure? You don't think there's evidence out there that would prove you wrong?

It's not an opinion. Do you not read or watch?

Umm, who is striking out like we are? Didn't we very recently have a pretty strong recruiting track record? Aren't there other schools, particularly bluebloods still getting theirs? Well, those are facts, dog!

Again, just claiming something isn't a fact doesn't make it so.

Also, I never claimed to be smart.

FilsonCat · Sep 3, 2026

Cattorney said:
Feel free to counter them....if you can!

Honestly speaking. Don't you have better things to do? There's a world of pro bono publico cases to be done around the Commonwealth, and plenty of billable work too.

Cattorney · Sep 3, 2026

FilsonCat said:
Honestly speaking. Don't you have better things to do? There's a world of pro bono publico cases to be done around the Commonwealth, and plenty of billable work too.

I don't do defense work. I actually have a soul.

Cowtown Cat · Sep 3, 2026

It’s just like………your opinion it’s a fact, man.

chroix · Sep 3, 2026

*Fox2Monk* said:
We will end up being the only school who couldn’t play a transfer out of all these lawsuits.

And paid for them too right?

bigblueinsanity (the real) · Sep 3, 2026

mdluk1 said:
The roster was basically set before Mitchell came available, so why not take a shot? The intra conference BS is just that. Aberdeen, MoD and BG all transferred to other SEC schools. It’s clearly selective enforcement.

Because we knew about the rule, bs or not. If we weren't going to sue over it we should've never gotten involved.

Now all we did was introduce some uncertainty to the current front line guys at the 11th hour and presumably spent some money on him or his efforts. All while knowing we were going to fold at the first sign of resistance.

That's why not.

mdluk1 · Sep 3, 2026

bigblueinsanity (the real) said:
Because we knew about the rule, bs or not. If we weren't going to sue over it we should've never gotten involved.

Now all we did was introduce some uncertainty to the current front line guys at the 11th hour and presumably spent some money on him or his efforts. All while knowing we were going to fold at the first sign of resistance.

That's why not.

Yeah, and I’m sure if you were the coach, you wouldn’t have tried.

LineSkiCat14 · Sep 3, 2026

cornbreadnmilk said:
Hiring his brother as an agent was an idiot move.

Pygmy Sasquatch said:
If Mitchell had hired a competent agent to advise him, he might be at UK this year. Hell, if he even talked to some of his peers, he might be with UK now.

Athletes hiring family members to handle their financial or contractual situations almost never works out well for them. Only one that comes to mind that worked well was Darrelle Revis. As I recall, his family weighed in on a lot of his resignings and he was constantly renegotiating to get a better pay day. Helps when you're one of the best CBs of all time of course.

Either way, makes no sense hiring your family for these matters unless this is truly their profession. But its like letting your brother manage youre retirement account. Why? Ill send it to a professional.

FilsonCat · Sep 3, 2026

Cattorney said:
I don't do defense work. I actually have a soul.

From what I have read of your posts here, I sincerely doubt that. Could you please explain how helping indigent and traditionally under-served people with their legal problems is lacking in "soul?" Better yet, explain that one to a bar ethics committee.

CatBearPig · Sep 3, 2026

The roster is 100% on Pope. Good or bad. This will be year three and the 3rd year we are out of the running for the national title before the first ball is tipped.

bigblueinsanity (the real) · Sep 3, 2026

mdluk1 said:
Yeah, and I’m sure if you were the coach, you wouldn’t have tried.

You are right, I would not have. I would've 1) checked to see if the school would sue if i went this route, because if not 2) gone after a non sec transfer.

We literally went after one of the few guys we were barred from getting.

Cattorney · Sep 3, 2026

Rapists, murderers, pedophiles, child porn manufacturers and distributors, drug traffickers and users, wife beaters, child beaters, animal abusers, wanna be gangbangers and so forth. Need I go on?

Also, why would the ethics committee care? They don't mandate who I represent or how I feel about others.

MachineHead · Sep 3, 2026

Anon726530 said:
Because he missed on all the 4s with the very biggest budget in the sport. In complete desperation time, he signed a player that is NCAA and SEC conference ineligible

enjoy your sweet 16, everyone is embarrassing us

No, this is also completely ******* stupid. Grow up.

Looks like Seth Trimble is now allowed to play for UL

All-Conference

Senior

All-Conference

Senior

All-Conference

Senior

All-Conference

Senior

Heisman

Heisman

All-American

All-Conference

Heisman

All-Conference

All-Conference

All-American

Senior

All-Conference