Are We Really An Embarrassment?

Deathstar

Sophomore
Sep 6, 2026
188
152
43
I do not think we are an embarrassment to college football. If we were ever a good team and we suddenly started playing like this it would be embarrassing. What we are seeing on the field this year is standard procedure for Gamecock teams. We have been doing this forever.

The way the ball bounces. I cannot explain how the ball always bounces the wrong way for us all the time. Whether it is bouncing off a goal post, bounces off a players back while fielding punts or bounces off our receiver into the DB’s hands. We just have bad luck with balls.

Coaching hires and contracts. I cannot explain how our AD’s hires loser coaches and give them record contracts for one good season. We did it with Phat Brad, we hired Chump after UF fired him and we already knew he was not a Head Coach (a good DC) and we hired Beamer because his Dad was a good coach (I guess hoping that genetics would win for us?). Then we gave these failures huge contracts that make it impossible to fire them. Why? And we did it in MBB as well.

Superstar players. I cannot explain how our multi-millionaire star players always fail to work out? I see other teams who have real star players that are working for far less than we are paying ours. Our coaches have to be some of the worst talent evaluators in all of college football. Again, a player has one good season and over-pay for years after.

Loyal fans. I cannot explain it, but there is still a thing called a “Shane Train”. Half of our fans still love the guy because he is “nice” and “really wants to be here”. No other program that I am aware of holds on to and rewards mediocre performing coaches (and AD because he won some baseball games 20 years ago) like we do. Why? It is not embarrassing because we have been doing this crap for so long!

Administration. We have always had meddling BOT’s and administrations going back to when I was a student in the 1980’s. Ever heard of Holderman? This is systemic and apparently never fixable. So if we replace Beamer this will be done by the same types of people who hired Phat Brad, Chump and Beamer.

Refs. SEC refs have been screwing us since we joined this conference. The ACC was screwing us as well back then, so we left them to eventually get the same result in the SEC. Are we not paying them off? Not paying enough? Do we not have enough of our former players and alumni working as SEC refs to help us out. I do not know why we get so many bad calls and non-calls? I have seen a SEC ref actually tackle our QB once to cost us a game.

Doing the same thing again and again, I expect that if we do find the money fire Beamer we will end up a team that is the same or worse. It’s systemic here!
 

Anon1667100206

Redshirt
Dec 29, 2014
90
28
18
I do not think we are an embarrassment to college football. If we were ever a good team and we suddenly started playing like this it would be embarrassing. What we are seeing on the field this year is standard procedure for Gamecock teams. We have been doing this forever.

The way the ball bounces. I cannot explain how the ball always bounces the wrong way for us all the time. Whether it is bouncing off a goal post, bounces off a players back while fielding punts or bounces off our receiver into the DB’s hands. We just have bad luck with balls.

Coaching hires and contracts. I cannot explain how our AD’s hires loser coaches and give them record contracts for one good season. We did it with Phat Brad, we hired Chump after UF fired him and we already knew he was not a Head Coach (a good DC) and we hired Beamer because his Dad was a good coach (I guess hoping that genetics would win for us?). Then we gave these failures huge contracts that make it impossible to fire them. Why? And we did it in MBB as well.

Superstar players. I cannot explain how our multi-millionaire star players always fail to work out? I see other teams who have real star players that are working for far less than we are paying ours. Our coaches have to be some of the worst talent evaluators in all of college football. Again, a player has one good season and over-pay for years after.

Loyal fans. I cannot explain it, but there is still a thing called a “Shane Train”. Half of our fans still love the guy because he is “nice” and “really wants to be here”. No other program that I am aware of holds on to and rewards mediocre performing coaches (and AD because he won some baseball games 20 years ago) like we do. Why? It is not embarrassing because we have been doing this crap for so long!

Administration. We have always had meddling BOT’s and administrations going back to when I was a student in the 1980’s. Ever heard of Holderman? This is systemic and apparently never fixable. So if we replace Beamer this will be done by the same types of people who hired Phat Brad, Chump and Beamer.

Refs. SEC refs have been screwing us since we joined this conference. The ACC was screwing us as well back then, so we left them to eventually get the same result in the SEC. Are we not paying them off? Not paying enough? Do we not have enough of our former players and alumni working as SEC refs to help us out. I do not know why we get so many bad calls and non-calls? I have seen a SEC ref actually tackle our QB once to cost us a game.

Doing the same thing again and again, I expect that if we do find the money fire Beamer we will end up a team that is the same or worse. It’s systemic here!
No one has been screwing your team. Y'all are legends in your own minds....have never been relevant and have never won anything of significance...thus, your empty trophy case with the exception of the 1969 A She She conference trophy!
 

Deathstar

Sophomore
Sep 6, 2026
188
152
43
Holtz and Spurrier proved you can win out South Carolina. We have to quit hiring lousy coaches.
It took Holtz a long time to fix Phat Brad, but he did, then in his last few years he should have just retired when it was going off the rails. He gave it to SOS, it took him a few years to finally make us good for a few years, then he should have retired but stuck around and it went off the rails. Nobody can sustain winning here for more than a few years because we have more issues than Time Magazine.
 

Deathstar

Sophomore
Sep 6, 2026
188
152
43
No one has been screwing your team. Y'all are legends in your own minds....have never been relevant and have never won anything of significance...thus, your empty trophy case with the exception of the 1969 A She She conference trophy!
That is my point, we have always been bad for a variety of reasons. Being screwed by refs and conferences is definitely part of it, Tater.
 

Cockofdawn

Senior
Aug 16, 2009
756
508
63
No longer an embarrassment, now just a laughing stock. This program has been an embarrassment, has slowly become “The lovable losers”.
 

Evilchicken

All-Conference
Sep 3, 2019
1,317
1,041
113
No one has been screwing your team. Y'all are legends in your own minds....have never been relevant and have never won anything of significance...thus, your empty trophy case with the exception of the 1969 A She She conference trophy!
Doesn’t really bother me that we have an empty trophy case—only a very few schools boast trophies. What bothers me is bad football. Also, it’s just entertainment. I don’t judge the size of my manhood based on how “my team” plays unlike you Scooter. 😘
 

Cockofdawn

Senior
Aug 16, 2009
756
508
63
Doesn’t really bother me that we have an empty trophy case—only a very few schools boast trophies. What bothers me is bad football. Also, it’s just entertainment. I don’t judge the size of my manhood based on how “my team” plays unlike you Scooter. 😘
Well said!! Some people judge their manhood by how well their favorite “ball” club plays!! lol. Sad sad people!!
 

Evilchicken

All-Conference
Sep 3, 2019
1,317
1,041
113
Well said!! Some people judge their manhood by how well their favorite “ball” club plays!! lol. Sad sad people!!
I’ve never understood people that go over to a rival’s website and talk ****. Like what kind of mental midget do you have to be to squeeze out a drop of satisfaction from another team’s bad football? There must be some deep self loathing there…
 

Blues man

Joined Jul 1, 2009
Jan 22, 2022
1,874
1,874
113
Holtz and Spurrier proved you can win out South Carolina. We have to quit hiring lousy coaches.
Yeah we went from hiring two HOF coaches to hiring a coach that was fired everywhere he went to hiring a TE coach. What were we thinking? This is us reaping what we sow.
 

DeBoer31

Joined Jun 19, 2015
Jun 19, 2015
1,295
1,138
113
I do not think we are an embarrassment to college football. If we were ever a good team and we suddenly started playing like this it would be embarrassing. What we are seeing on the field this year is standard procedure for Gamecock teams. We have been doing this forever.

The way the ball bounces. I cannot explain how the ball always bounces the wrong way for us all the time. Whether it is bouncing off a goal post, bounces off a players back while fielding punts or bounces off our receiver into the DB’s hands. We just have bad luck with balls.

Coaching hires and contracts. I cannot explain how our AD’s hires loser coaches and give them record contracts for one good season. We did it with Phat Brad, we hired Chump after UF fired him and we already knew he was not a Head Coach (a good DC) and we hired Beamer because his Dad was a good coach (I guess hoping that genetics would win for us?). Then we gave these failures huge contracts that make it impossible to fire them. Why? And we did it in MBB as well.

Superstar players. I cannot explain how our multi-millionaire star players always fail to work out? I see other teams who have real star players that are working for far less than we are paying ours. Our coaches have to be some of the worst talent evaluators in all of college football. Again, a player has one good season and over-pay for years after.

Loyal fans. I cannot explain it, but there is still a thing called a “Shane Train”. Half of our fans still love the guy because he is “nice” and “really wants to be here”. No other program that I am aware of holds on to and rewards mediocre performing coaches (and AD because he won some baseball games 20 years ago) like we do. Why? It is not embarrassing because we have been doing this crap for so long!

Administration. We have always had meddling BOT’s and administrations going back to when I was a student in the 1980’s. Ever heard of Holderman? This is systemic and apparently never fixable. So if we replace Beamer this will be done by the same types of people who hired Phat Brad, Chump and Beamer.

Refs. SEC refs have been screwing us since we joined this conference. The ACC was screwing us as well back then, so we left them to eventually get the same result in the SEC. Are we not paying them off? Not paying enough? Do we not have enough of our former players and alumni working as SEC refs to help us out. I do not know why we get so many bad calls and non-calls? I have seen a SEC ref actually tackle our QB once to cost us a game.

Doing the same thing again and again, I expect that if we do find the money fire Beamer we will end up a team that is the same or worse. It’s systemic here!
Man….you are all over it.
 

Anon1667100206

Redshirt
Dec 29, 2014
90
28
18
I’ve never understood people that go over to a rival’s website and talk ****. Like what kind of mental midget do you have to be to squeeze out a drop of satisfaction from another team’s bad football? There must be some deep self loathing there…
I come here for the laughs from you delusional UofSC fans. Once again, this is who you are....have never won anything....always waiting until next year. Too funny!!!
 

sclawman77

All-Conference
Jun 27, 2011
1,575
1,440
113
It took Holtz a long time to fix Phat Brad, but he did, then in his last few years he should have just retired when it was going off the rails. He gave it to SOS, it took him a few years to finally make us good for a few years, then he should have retired but stuck around and it went off the rails. Nobody can sustain winning here for more than a few years because we have more issues than Time Magazine.
It took Lou two seasons to fix Brad's mess. He put us back on the map with the Outback bowl wins. He left a mediocre program after 6 seasons but had a winning record his last season (Shane can't sniff a winning season now).
 

I4CtheFuture

All-Conference
Oct 5, 2024
1,453
1,478
113
I come here for the laughs from you delusional UofSC fans. Once again, this is who you are....have never won anything....always waiting until next year. Too funny!!!
Just remember: Nothing Clemmons does is legitimate.

81' - bought and paid for, nearly got the death penalty
last second illegal pick play
Ostarine Cheatahs

Again, nothing Clemmons does is legitimate.
 

RL09

All-Conference
Dec 29, 2025
952
1,090
93
Brad Scott looked like a solid hire at the time and let us not forget, he won the first bowl game in USC history, oddly enough he accomplished that with Sparky's players. Brad Scott is also the coach who recruited the late Phil Petty, who played an integral role in turning the program around. That was just a hire that did not work out. However hiring Muschamp was just plain stupid, no other way of looking at that, he was a loser at Florida, one could argue that loss to us was one of the ingredients that got him fired. Our previous AD failed to realize if Muschamp could not win at Florida in our same division, then he was almost certainly not going to win here either. Then the Muschamp hire was followed up with a person with no experience as a HC or even coordinator, so there was virtually no job history to gauge his chances for success here, in short, hiring Beamer was a massive gamble. The common thread was the previous AD. Lou Holtz and Steve Spurrier proved you could win here.
 

bayrooster

All-American
Aug 21, 2003
15,582
8,008
113
That is my point, we have always been bad for a variety of reasons. Being screwed by refs and conferences is definitely part of it, Tater.
We are an embarrassment because of Beamer. I had to explain to a nephew last week that it was our idiot head coach he saw jumping into the arms of a player that did something good while we were on our way to losing to Miss St.
 

Piscis

All-Conference
Nov 30, 2001
25,695
3,290
113
Brad Scott looked like a solid hire at the time and let us not forget, he won the first bowl game in USC history, oddly enough he accomplished that with Sparky's players. Brad Scott is also the coach who recruited the late Phil Petty, who played an integral role in turning the program around. That was just a hire that did not work out. However hiring Muschamp was just plain stupid, no other way of looking at that, he was a loser at Florida, one could argue that loss to us was one of the ingredients that got him fired. Our previous AD failed to realize if Muschamp could not win at Florida in our same division, then he was almost certainly not going to win here either. Then the Muschamp hire was followed up with a person with no experience as a HC or even coordinator, so there was virtually no job history to gauge his chances for success here, in short, hiring Beamer was a massive gamble. The common thread was the previous AD. Lou Holtz and Steve Spurrier proved you could win here.
Did Lou and Spurrier really "win" here? Look at their overall records. They were better than our average over our history, but they weren't winning anything of consequence.
 

Dabo's Weenie

Senior
Nov 30, 2024
880
944
93
No one has been screwing your team. Y'all are legends in your own minds....have never been relevant and have never won anything of significance...thus, your empty trophy case with the exception of the 1969 A She She conference trophy!

Shouldn't you be minding the frialator so you can earn some extra money to buy out your HOF clown, uh, coach? Wouldn't want you to get fired and have to listen to Tyler from Spartanburg call again because the collection came up short on your account.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cockofdawn

Cockofdawn

Senior
Aug 16, 2009
756
508
63
Shouldn't you be minding the frialator so you can earn some extra money to buy out your HOF clown, uh, coach? Wouldn't want you to get fired and have to listen to Tyler from Spartanburg call again because the collection came up short on your account.
He coaches in the ACC, hell, I could win half of my games coaching in that 4A conference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blues man

nlstanford

Joined Sep 9, 2002
Sep 9, 2002
300
837
73
Did Lou and Spurrier really "win" here? Look at their overall records. They were better than our average over our history, but they weren't winning anything of consequence.
As the poster said, it took both coaches a few seasons to turn things around. And yes, I call 33-6 with three NYD bowl wins against quality P4 opponents winning. In fact, in the playoff era that most likely equates to three straight playoff appearances, possibly a championship with the way those teams played. Program was just in the wrong place at the wrong time, which seems to be a theme more than anything else.
 

HWGcock

Joined Nov 2, 1998 • Garnet Trust Supporter
Nov 2, 1998
2,170
3,697
113
I’ve never understood people that go over to a rival’s website and talk ****. Like what kind of mental midget do you have to be to squeeze out a drop of satisfaction from another team’s bad football? There must be some deep self loathing there…
A real life lowdown loser does that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cockofdawn

Statepawdog

All-Conference
Jun 23, 2016
1,245
1,492
113
Not a Gamecock fan, but the season is not over. Carolina can beat Arkansas, Texas A&M, and Oklahoma. Toss up games against Tennessee and Clemson and one game against a smaller school. It does not sound possible right now but 7-5 is very possible. 8-4 may be a stretch.
 

Slim Chickens Gamecock

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2022
1,691
1,856
113
Individual talent variance still disables us. Take the opening long run by Fuller. HE was untouched. I love this kid. He is a beast and may be the current toughest kid on the team and exhibits heart and desire. But the fact of the matter is there are lots of college running backs that would have been fast enough to score on that play. He just didn't have that next gear to outrun and post 6 on the board. And we all know our propensity to blow things up when we have positive Mo. Would it have made a difference in the long term of the game? probably not. Split seconds make the difference. If their receivers had not been so glaringly open, possibly we could have gotten to the QB if he had to hold it a mili-second longer. Sack Vs bomb touchdown.

What I hate is we make the game seem like a home coming game. their fans were partying early and all night.
 

bcs summa

All-Conference
Jul 31, 2008
3,521
3,878
93
I predict neither SC team is going to end up proud of this years edition AND both coaches will still be here a couple of years from now because of ridiculous buyouts
 

Piscis

All-Conference
Nov 30, 2001
25,695
3,290
113
As the poster said, it took both coaches a few seasons to turn things around. And yes, I call 33-6 with three NYD bowl wins against quality P4 opponents winning. In fact, in the playoff era that most likely equates to three straight playoff appearances, possibly a championship with the way those teams played. Program was just in the wrong place at the wrong time, which seems to be a theme more than anything else.
Spurrier was 4 games over .500 in conference play and quit mid season, Holtz had an overall losing record and was 10 games UNDER .500 in SEC play. Neither one ever made it to a major bowl game.

No doubt they were the best at SC, and that is sort of sad.
 

nlstanford

Joined Sep 9, 2002
Sep 9, 2002
300
837
73
Did Lou and Spurrier really "win" here? Look at their overall records. They were better than our average over our history, but they weren't winning anything of consequence.
As the poster said, it took both coaches a few seasons to turn things around. And yes, I call 33-6 with three NYD bowl wins against quality P4 opponents winning. In fact, in the playoff era that most likely equates to three straight playoff appearances, possibly a championship with the way those teams played. Program was just in the wrong place at the wrong time, which seems to be a theme more than anything else.
Spurrier was 4 games over .500 in conference play and quit mid season, Holtz had an overall losing record and was 10 games UNDER .500 in SEC play. Neither one ever made it to a major bowl game.

No doubt they were the best at SC, and that is sort of sad.
What are you even talking about? I just told you that in 2011-13 under Spurrier we were 33-6 with wins against Nebraska (when that mattered), Michigan, and Wisconsin (when they were peak) at the Capital One Bowl x 2 and the Outback Bowl. You can argue all you want about how they started or ended, but the reality is both coaches had us playing damn good football for a while. In typical Gamecock fashion we squandered that away.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blues man

Piscis

All-Conference
Nov 30, 2001
25,695
3,290
113
As the poster said, it took both coaches a few seasons to turn things around. And yes, I call 33-6 with three NYD bowl wins against quality P4 opponents winning. In fact, in the playoff era that most likely equates to three straight playoff appearances, possibly a championship with the way those teams played. Program was just in the wrong place at the wrong time, which seems to be a theme more than anything else.

What are you even talking about? I just told you that in 2011-13 under Spurrier we were 33-6 with wins against Nebraska (when that mattered), Michigan, and Wisconsin (when they were peak) at the Capital One Bowl x 2 and the Outback Bowl. You can argue all you want about how they started or ended, but the reality is both coaches had us playing damn good football for a while. In typical Gamecock fashion we squandered that away.
My point was, they weren't consistently good long term. Yes, they were "Carolina good", a few flashes but nothing that stuck. Capital One and Outback are tier 2 bowls, regardless of what day they are played on.

We squandered it away when we hired each of them. Hiring retreads at the end of their careers isn't a good plan for long term success.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nlstanford

DannyTree1

Sophomore
Jun 4, 2026
372
173
43
I do not think we are an embarrassment to college football.

I don't think so.

I heard a national show over the weekend, before our game, mention us a team that is considered to be near the bottom of the SEC. I think that is how most people see us most years.

The host wasn't saying it as an attack. He was just mentioning teams and mentioned us as one near the bottom of the conference and he moved on to another subject. I think that's how most see us.
 
GamecockCentral

Latest

  1. 01 GamecockCentral Football Insider Report: What's gone wrong for South Carolina, Bama game thoughts, what's next?
  2. 02 GamecockCentral Football 10 takeaways from South Carolina's blowout loss to Alabama
  3. 03 GamecockCentral Football Shane Beamer talks job security after South Carolina's 0-2 start to SEC play
  4. 04 GamecockCentral Football PFF Grades: South Carolina's Week 4 loss to Alabama
  5. 05 GamecockCentral Baseball Key questions for South Carolina as fall baseball practice begins this week