Toggle sidebar

Run for the hills! The migrant caravan is marching again!

nytigerfan

nytigerfan

Heisman
Dec 9, 2004
10,598
14,132
102
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: blackbones, fskillet, THE_DEVIL and 4 others
dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
35,312
32,358
113
LafayetteBear said:
Wait, wut?! I thought Trump & Co. had closed and secured our southern border. Isn't there a Big Beautiful Wall running its entire length by now? Didn't Steve Bannon raise a whole bunch of private money for that Wall? Oh, wait. Bannon stole that money.
Click to expand...
Do you not understand that electing a Democratic Congress would cause the border to magically re-open?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moral
Scrubby

Scrubby

Heisman
Jul 2, 2025
11,774
15,422
113
dpic73 said:
Do you not understand that electing a Democratic Congress would cause the border to magically re-open?
Click to expand...
Dems literally tried to codify Biden and Harris’s open border failures into law prior to the 2024 election lol
 
nytigerfan

nytigerfan

Heisman
Dec 9, 2004
10,598
14,132
102
Scrubby said:
Dems literally tried to codify Biden and Harris’s open border failures into law prior to the 2024 election lol
Click to expand...
Actually, that was Dems and Republicans. That was bipartisan legislation there, Skippy. Of course, Trump wanted to run on the border, so he commanded the Republicans not to do it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
Scrubby

Scrubby

Heisman
Jul 2, 2025
11,774
15,422
113
nytigerfan said:
Actually, that was Dems and Republicans. That was bipartisan legislation there, Skippy. Of course, Trump wanted to run on the border, so he commanded the Republicans not to do it.
Click to expand...
It was trash legislation. A Trump w if he was actually involved
 
S

scotchtiger

Heisman
Dec 15, 2005
135,331
23,543
113
nytigerfan said:
Actually, that was Dems and Republicans. That was bipartisan legislation there, Skippy. Of course, Trump wanted to run on the border, so he commanded the Republicans not to do it.
Click to expand...

It was a terrible bill. 5k encounters per day before measures were raised. We’re averaging 278 per day in 2026. We didn’t need trash legislation to get there.


In the 2024 bipartisan Senate border bill backed by the Biden administration, the key number was 5,000 encounters per day, averaged over seven consecutive days.

More precisely:

  • At a 7-day average of 4,000 encounters/day, the DHS secretary could activate the new “border emergency authority.”
  • At a 7-day average of 5,000 encounters/day, DHS would be required to activate it.
  • If encounters reached 8,500 on any single day, activation would also be mandatory. Those thresholds appear directly in the bill text.
  • Once activated, the emergency authority would allow DHS to rapidly remove or turn away many migrants crossing between ports of entry and substantially restrict access to asylum.
 
nytigerfan

nytigerfan

Heisman
Dec 9, 2004
10,598
14,132
102
scotchtiger said:
It was a terrible bill. 5k encounters per day before measures were raised. We’re averaging 278 per day in 2026. We didn’t need trash legislation to get there.


In the 2024 bipartisan Senate border bill backed by the Biden administration, the key number was 5,000 encounters per day, averaged over seven consecutive days.

More precisely:

  • At a 7-day average of 4,000 encounters/day, the DHS secretary could activate the new “border emergency authority.”
  • At a 7-day average of 5,000 encounters/day, DHS would be required to activate it.
  • If encounters reached 8,500 on any single day, activation would also be mandatory. Those thresholds appear directly in the bill text.
  • Once activated, the emergency authority would allow DHS to rapidly remove or turn away many migrants crossing between ports of entry and substantially restrict access to asylum.
Click to expand...

Yep. And when a dem becomes president in 2028, they can override Trump's executive order on immigration their first day. Legislation done by Congress is the only thing that actually can stick. I still think allowing migrants in is the right thing to do. It's what we've always done. A limit of 5,000 is not that many, just as the cattle ranchers who are now complaining that they don't have labor
 
B

baltimorened

All-American
May 29, 2001
8,668
6,393
113
nytigerfan said:
Actually, that was Dems and Republicans. That was bipartisan legislation there, Skippy. Of course, Trump wanted to run on the border, so he commanded the Republicans not to do it.
Click to expand...
been down this path before....one Republican....

Before trump, house said bill would not be brought to the floor....this legislation was dead before it got to Senate floor.

If you want to have bipartisan legislation that will pass (kind of essential in the process) you have to have Senate, house and white house on board...one out of three won't cut it. You're smart enough to to know that this legislation in Senate form wouldn't even pass the Senate, much less the house.
 
B

baltimorened

All-American
May 29, 2001
8,668
6,393
113
nytigerfan said:
Yep. And when a dem becomes president in 2028, they can override Trump's executive order on immigration their first day. Legislation done by Congress is the only thing that actually can stick. I still think allowing migrants in is the right thing to do. It's what we've always done. A limit of 5,000 is not that many, just as the cattle ranchers who are now complaining that they don't have labor
Click to expand...
it's not what we've always done...there have been limits on the number of people who were given access each year. I doubt we've ever had a situation like during the Biden admin
 
dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
35,312
32,358
113
TigerGrowls said:
Click to expand...

Was COVID SO BAD in May 2023?

The Biden administration officially lifted the pandemic-era Title 42 border restrictions at 11:59 PM EDT on May 11, 2023, alongside the expiration of the federal COVID-19 public health emergency. https://hias.org/news/end-title-42-five-key-takeaways/

Mexico and the United States achieved comparable overall COVID-19 vaccination coverage over the course of the pandemic, despite a stark early-stage disparity in 2021. [1, 2]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Tiger Illustrated

Latest

  1. 01 Tiger Illustrated Football A fair question to ask about Clemson Football ahead of its showdown with No. 4 Miami
  2. 02 Tiger Illustrated Football Thursday Clemson Football Insider
  3. 03 Tiger Illustrated Football Recruiting Thursday Clemson Football Recruiting Nuggets
  4. 04 On3 Football College sports bill facing pressure in the House: 'We won’t pass language to blow up the ACC'
  5. 05 On3 Football Inside college football’s looming contract fight: Why player buyouts are about to take center stage
Top Bottom