Toggle sidebar

100% "warming" data last hundred years fabricated?

funKYcat75

funKYcat75

Well-known member
Apr 10, 2008
32,257
14,822
112
  • Like
Reactions: catfaninsc_rivals377375, UKraziest, mashburned and 1 other person
K

Kooky Kats

New member
Aug 17, 2002
25,741
15,702
0
 
A

Ahnan E. Muss

New member
Nov 13, 2003
2,934
274
0
  • Like
Reactions: MegaBlue05, -LEK-, _Chase_ and 1 other person
R

Ron Mehico

New member
Jan 4, 2008
15,475
2,062
0
How the hell did the GD weather become political anyway? I'm so damn confused by it. So there might be a chance with all the chemicals we're pumping out that we might be screwing up the environment? And that sounds so far fetched why? Also who gives a **** either way? Isn't the whole point that we should have less pollution? Why the hell is anyone opposing that again?
 
  • Like
Reactions: vanillaslice_rivals204083
B

BlueKel_rivals210266

New member
May 25, 2002
36,812
397
0
The suggestion that us pouring tons and tons and tons of carbon emissions into the atmosphere, and it not having some sort of impact is kind of crazy. Granted, the Earth goes through its natural cycles over time as well, some perhaps the human equation is minimal. But the thought process that it is impossible and just some crazed theory is a lot of denial.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vanillaslice_rivals204083
U

UKserialkiller

New member
Dec 13, 2009
34,297
35,841
0
BlueKel said:
The suggestion that us pouring tons and tons and tons of carbon emissions into the atmosphere, and it not having some sort of impact is kind of crazy. Granted, the Earth goes through its natural cycles over time as well, some perhaps the human equation is minimal. But the thought process that it is impossible and just some crazed theory is a lot of denial.
Click to expand...

Carbon=bad
Methane=good

Don't animal farts cause damage to the climate? Seems like I heard that one. Like 50% of the damage
 
  • Like
Reactions: d2atTech and AustinTXCat
_Chase_

_Chase_

Well-known member
Jan 22, 2004
33,880
8,755
113
allabouttheUK said:
So because NASA says it's real, it must be real?
Click to expand...
Here's a list of 198 scientific organizations outside the United States that agree with NASA.


Put please, by all means continue to place your faith in random blogs with articles like "The Government Knew", "Climate Racketeering", and "Global Temperature Records Is A Smoking Gun of Collusion and Fraud."
 
  • Like
Reactions: vanillaslice_rivals204083, BristolCat_rivals158386 and BlueKel_rivals210266
A

allabouttheUK

New member
Jan 28, 2015
3,079
3,381
0
_Chase_ said:
Here's a list of 198 scientific organizations outside the United States that agree with NASA.


Put please, by all means continue to place your faith in random blogs with articles like "The Government Knew", "Climate Racketeering", and "Global Temperature Records Is A Smoking Gun of Collusion and Fraud."
Click to expand...

So nobody gains from creating world wide panic with the impending doom that is global warming caused by us ignorant humans? Is that what you're saying?

I'd be more willing to read a study or see some facts that aren't from a government agency. Forgive me, but I don't buy **** that the government or the MSM try to sell me.
 
B

Bill Cosby

New member
May 1, 2008
29,258
4,225
0
_Chase_ said:
Here's a list of 198 scientific organizations outside the United States that agree with NASA.


Put please, by all means continue to place your faith in random blogs with articles like "The Government Knew", "Climate Racketeering", and "Global Temperature Records Is A Smoking Gun of Collusion and Fraud."
Click to expand...


Posting the link is far more effective than actually posting the list like every other global warming thread. That way, people actually have to click the link to see "Australian Medical Association", "American Academy of Pediatrics", etc.

For the record, I don't really give a **** if the globe is warming and the Islamic World Academy of Sciences concurs.

I'd rather die on a burned up planet than give one single dollar to the US government or some ******** UN organization in the name of paying my fair share. Just a shame the US paying more money is the only solution ever discussed. I don't think anyone disagrees that pollution is bad for the earth even if the planet isn't heating.
 
_Chase_

_Chase_

Well-known member
Jan 22, 2004
33,880
8,755
113
allabouttheUK said:
So nobody gains from creating world wide panic with the impending doom that is global warming caused by us ignorant humans? Is that what you're saying?

I'd be more willing to read a study or see some facts that aren't from a government agency. Forgive me, but I don't buy **** that the government or the MSM try to sell me.
Click to expand...

[laughing]

But you definitely buy the **** "Tinfoilhatinyourass.com" is trying to sell you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BristolCat_rivals158386
R

Ron Mehico

New member
Jan 4, 2008
15,475
2,062
0
allabouttheUK said:
So nobody gains from creating world wide panic with the impending doom that is global warming caused by us ignorant humans? Is that what you're saying?
Click to expand...

What world wide panic? What the hell are you talking about? Are people looting in the streets and burning down government buildings? Who the hell is gaining from us wanting to pollute the environment less? I seriously don't get it. Seems the only people that lose out are massive corporations and big oil that will have more regulations on them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vanillaslice_rivals204083 and _Chase_
_Chase_

_Chase_

Well-known member
Jan 22, 2004
33,880
8,755
113
I'd be willing to bet that if you were smart enough to find out who actually owns and funds these climate change denying blogs, you'd find a few big corporations at the end of the rainbow.
 
A

allabouttheUK

New member
Jan 28, 2015
3,079
3,381
0
Ron Mehico said:
What world wide panic? What the hell are you talking about? Are people looting in the streets and burning down government buildings? Who the hell is gaining from us wanting to pollute the environment less? I seriously don't get it. Seems the only people that lose out are massive corporations and big oil that will have more regulations on them.
Click to expand...

The panic that is the Global Warming nuts...you know the crowd as we all do the "OMG we're killing the earth!" those nut jobs. I'm all for recycling and **** like that, but some people need to get a freakin grip. I mean how many years ago did Florida disappear into the ocean? There were "studies" and charts available 30 years ago saying that the world would look drastically different by now...oops. Oh wait, the greenies must have saved the planet, right?
 
B

Bill Cosby

New member
May 1, 2008
29,258
4,225
0
_Chase_ said:
I'd be willing to bet that if you were smart enough to find out who actually owns and funds these climate change denying blogs, you'd find a few big corporations at the end of the rainbow.
Click to expand...

You know what, I never thought of that.

Maybe I should follow the money on the side of the deniers. See if I can tie it all back to Exxon.

Thank god we have organizations like the ones on you list that are completely independent and in no way could be influenced by any sort of money.


Also if you were smart enough to actually read your list and see what some of those organizations have published on global warming, you'd realize a fair amount of them have never in any way, shape or form ever actually studied global warming.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ScrewDuke1 and YourPublicEnemy
M

Moopyj

New member
Dec 19, 2016
749
588
0
  • Like
Reactions: mashburned
A

allabouttheUK

New member
Jan 28, 2015
3,079
3,381
0
_Chase_ said:
I'd be willing to bet that if you were smart enough to find out who actually owns and funds these climate change denying blogs, you'd find a few big corporations at the end of the rainbow.
Click to expand...

I'd be willing to bet if you were smart enough to find out who actually owns and funds these climate change reports, you'd find government at the end of the rainbow.

It goes both ways, man.

Everything in moderation. The ignorance that it has to be one extreme or the other is the problem.
 
A

allabouttheUK

New member
Jan 28, 2015
3,079
3,381
0
_Chase_ said:
[laughing]

But you definitely buy the **** "Tinfoilhatinyourass.com" is trying to sell you.
Click to expand...

Dude, if you think I'm on one side or the other, you are mistaken. I enjoy reading and watching videos on conspiracies, I find it entertaining, doesn't mean I believe the ****. It should have been evident with my posts earlier in this thread.
I'm all for moderation, not jumping to one side or the other, I believe in balance.
 
R

Ron Mehico

New member
Jan 4, 2008
15,475
2,062
0
allabouttheUK said:
The panic that is the Global Warming nuts...you know the crowd as we all do the "OMG we're killing the earth!" those nut jobs.
Click to expand...

Ya but those are mainly stupid 18 year olds or hippies. Just because they are super extreme doesn't mean THE GOVERNMENT CONSPIRASY OF CLIMATE CHANGE!! That's just as ridiculous a side as the other extreme. Is it really that hard to believe that pumping out a smog cloud for 50 years straight years might mess up the sky adjacent to it? I mean what the hell is so crazy about that? I'm all for renewable energy and solar and wind energy. Why not? Why not shoot for better air and water? I mean look what happened to flint Michigan. How does it negatively effect anyone that we are striving to be more green? I don't get it
 
A

allabouttheUK

New member
Jan 28, 2015
3,079
3,381
0
Ron Mehico said:
Ya but those are mainly stupid 18 year olds or hippies. Just because they are super extreme doesn't mean THE GOVERNMENT CONSPIRASY OF CLIMATE CHANGE!! That's just as ridiculous a side as the other extreme. Is it really that hard to believe that pumping out a smog cloud for 50 years straight years might mess up the sky adjacent to it? I mean what the hell is so crazy about that? I'm all for renewable energy and solar and wind energy. Why not? Why not shoot for better air and water? I mean look what happened to flint Michigan? How does it negatively effect anyone that we are striving to be more green? I don't get it
Click to expand...

I'd agree with with you about extremes, that was my point all along.

Trees trees and more trees. You want to mine, fine, but replace what you rip up. Trees are natural air filters, no? So who is to say that it's not the pollutants we put in the air, but the filters that we have taken away and not replaced that is the problem? Nothing wrong with solar, wind, hydro, etc...just as long as everything is balanced. You rely on one form of energy and the consumer pays the price.
Flint, Michigan was the result of ****** politicians trying to save a few bucks. I get what your saying, but that's a poor example.
How does it negatively affect anyone....hmmm. For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction, no? The path to hell was paved with good intention. What I'm getting at is there is always unforeseen problems/reactions to everything, good or bad.

Balance is the key.
 
B

Bill Cosby

New member
May 1, 2008
29,258
4,225
0
What's so wrong with cleaning the earth and using renewable energy?

Nothing.

Unless your definition of cleaning the earth is establishing a global carbon trading market so a select few can become billionaires while people still pollute the earth, having the US pay to a global organization to give my tax dollars to other world leaders, giving government grants to friends that run green energy companies, etc.


Once your actual solutions involve something other than taking money from me and giving it to other people or countries, I'm ready to listen. Until then I don't give a **** if it ever rains another drop in Africa.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wildcatwelder_rivals, IdaCat, wildcatadam6 and 10 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom