12-1
- Thread starter DAWG61
- Start date
And we gave already beaten more quailty OOC opponents than in the last 6-8 years combined so forget about it
You all know that Stands' MO is to lose to weak teams early and often through the 1st half of the season, then make a mid/late season push to "earn" NCAA bubble status.<div>
</div><div>This team hasn't done that. The team has taken care of business thoughout the 1st half of the season. We could be in for something really good.</div>
</div><div>This team hasn't done that. The team has taken care of business thoughout the 1st half of the season. We could be in for something really good.</div>
<div>'00/'01: @ Cal 76-83 OT;Richmond 72-83</div><div>'01/'02: Cincinnati(Las Vegas) 56-90</div><div>'02/'03: La-Lafayette 76-79</div><div>'03/'04: -</div><div>'04/'05: Syracuse(NYC) 58-71; Arizona(Anaheim) 64-68</div><div>
</div><div>'01 California: 20-11, lost in the first round of NCAA to Fresno State.</div><div>'01 Richmond: 22-7, Won CAA regular season and lost in 2nd round of NIT.</div><div>'02 Cincinnati: 31-4, C-USA Champions, No. 1 Seed, lost in 2nd round to UCLA.</div><div>'03 La-Lafayette: 22-10, lost to UAB in 1st round of NIT</div><div>'05 Syracuse: 27-7, Big East Tourney Champs, lost in 1st round to Vermont.</div><div>'05 Arizona: 30-7, PAC-10 Champion, lost in Elite 8 to Illinois.</div><div>
</div>
</div><div>'01 California: 20-11, lost in the first round of NCAA to Fresno State.</div><div>'01 Richmond: 22-7, Won CAA regular season and lost in 2nd round of NIT.</div><div>'02 Cincinnati: 31-4, C-USA Champions, No. 1 Seed, lost in 2nd round to UCLA.</div><div>'03 La-Lafayette: 22-10, lost to UAB in 1st round of NIT</div><div>'05 Syracuse: 27-7, Big East Tourney Champs, lost in 1st round to Vermont.</div><div>'05 Arizona: 30-7, PAC-10 Champion, lost in Elite 8 to Illinois.</div><div>
</div>
skb124 said:
and that's why I posted his stats. He had 6 points and 3 assists. Considering this was his best game of the year so far I'd say that you are the idiot because you have told yourself he is great and will be our starting point guard next year. What has he done to deserve the starting job? He's had one nice dunk the entire season. He can't shoot for ****. Doubt me? Look at his stats then go throw up in the toilet. On top of being the worst statistical shooter that I can remember playing for MSU for considerable minutes he TURNS THE BALL OVER. This doesn't mean he can't improve but why is everyone so in love with him? Why is everyone fine with him being the starting PG? I'm not. I see a much worse shooting Gary Ervin all over again. I hope I'm wrong. I will be very happy to eat my words about Deville many times over but I doubt I am wrong. Reason? Because he isn't going to magically learn how to shoot.
Did you watch the AZ game... He is a freshman..... Who in the he'll will be the PG next year if it isn't Deville?..
Neither is anyone else on this board. The fact of the matter is you obviously hate him. He is not the starting point guard right now. We think he will be next year. He is going through some growing pains right now. That's good though. He is getting valuable experience right now and he is realizing that he cant do everything he did in high school. Im not saying he is for sure going to be the point guard (I think he will be), but you ARE saying that he is not. He's not even halfway through his freshman year and youve made that claim. That's whats idiotic. For every turnover he has, he shows a flash of brilliance. Is he ready to be the starting point guard right now? NO, THATS WHY HE ISN'T. Idiot.
Some posters prove their ignorance every post.
great start to what should be a great season.... go DOGS!
great start to what should be a great season.... go DOGS!
fishwater99 said:
I keep bringing it up? Are you starting to see the gaping hole next year if Deville isn't ready? I don't hate Deville. I like his speed and quickness of the bench when the other team is getting tired. I don't like him as the majority minutes point guard though because he can't shoot and he turns it over. I'd like their to be an option B for next year at the PG position and that option shouldn't be a signed starting true freshman either. I'd like to see Jalen Steele at that spot honestly.
Steele would be a turnover machine at the 1. He s a shooting guard or a reason. Deville will be just fine, and he can shoot the ball, trust me. I've been watching him for three years, he as what it takes, just needs some time to adjust to the college game. You point guard really should not be one of your leading scorers, his job is to run the offense and get the ball to the other players so they can score... He also has had some medical issues, but I am hearing he is doing better now.. Merry Christmas.