Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="The Bell Tolls for Thee" data-source="post: 131191871" data-attributes="member: 1812660"><p>Does everything have to 100%?&nbsp; Since the 2009 and 2010 team, WVU has been inconsistent in half court offense and has looked bad more often than not during that time.&nbsp; That is 10 teams and multiple players.&nbsp; Is it unreasonable to think that maybe some of that is Huggins and not just a rash of players not executing?&nbsp; Pointing that out is not saying Huggins is a bad coach or it outweighs all the good he does, it's just being objective in that producing a team with consistent offensive production in the half court is an area where there is room for improvement.&nbsp; Turnovers and offensive rebounds to allow your team to make more shots to compensate for lower FG percentage has made WVU look good in some games, but also led to some ugly losses.&nbsp; If you feel that Huggins' recipe is the best WVU is likely to do with the ingredients available, I can understand that.&nbsp; However when the same flaw is present across multiple teams, at least some of that must fall on the coaches shoulders.&nbsp; Nothing is ever 100%, unless it's on this message board it seems.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="The Bell Tolls for Thee, post: 131191871, member: 1812660"] Does everything have to 100%? Since the 2009 and 2010 team, WVU has been inconsistent in half court offense and has looked bad more often than not during that time. That is 10 teams and multiple players. Is it unreasonable to think that maybe some of that is Huggins and not just a rash of players not executing? Pointing that out is not saying Huggins is a bad coach or it outweighs all the good he does, it's just being objective in that producing a team with consistent offensive production in the half court is an area where there is room for improvement. Turnovers and offensive rebounds to allow your team to make more shots to compensate for lower FG percentage has made WVU look good in some games, but also led to some ugly losses. If you feel that Huggins' recipe is the best WVU is likely to do with the ingredients available, I can understand that. However when the same flaw is present across multiple teams, at least some of that must fall on the coaches shoulders. Nothing is ever 100%, unless it's on this message board it seems. [/QUOTE]

Name