2012 Schedule starting to leak...

engie

Freshman
May 29, 2011
10,747
92
48
Surprisingly, we keep the Tn home game, while losing the USCe away game for a (likely road) game against A&M. I'm quite happy with that trade. Considering the SC game a loss, the A&M and TN games toss ups, we likely get at least one additional conference win out of this scenario.

In other notes, it looks like the Bears get to weasel their way out of a trip to Athens and their Florida home game, to play Mizzou at home and A&M on the road...

Source: http://www.mrsec.com/2011...mrseccom+%28MrSEC.com%29
 

engie

Freshman
May 29, 2011
10,747
92
48
Surprisingly, we keep the Tn home game, while losing the USCe away game for a (likely road) game against A&M. I'm quite happy with that trade. Considering the SC game a loss, the A&M and TN games toss ups, we likely get at least one additional conference win out of this scenario.

In other notes, it looks like the Bears get to weasel their way out of a trip to Athens and their Florida home game, to play Mizzou at home and A&M on the road...

Source: http://www.mrsec.com/2011...mrseccom+%28MrSEC.com%29
 

fishwater99

Freshman
Jun 4, 2007
14,072
53
48
Bunch of *********... I told you we would play everyone in the West next year, it's the only way to have real West Champion....
 

Dawgbite

All-American
Nov 1, 2011
7,963
7,831
113
Tennessee travels well and their fans arent too obnoxious and the fact they have sunk back into mediocrity makes that a winnable game. Definitly looking forward to a visit to Kyle Field.
 

irondawg007

Redshirt
Jan 23, 2007
477
0
0
vs. Jackson St.
@ Troy<div>vs. South Alabama</div><div>vs. Auburn</div><div>@ LSU</div><div>vs. Tennessee</div><div>@ Texas A&M</div><div>vs. Kentucky</div><div>@ Bama</div><div>vs. Arkansas
@ Ole Miss
</div><div>
</div><div>One more non-conference missing: Is it LA Tech again? </div>
 

thatsbaseball

All-American
May 29, 2007
17,582
5,983
113
"The SEC will go with an eight-game league schedule next year (though we still firmly believe the league will adopt a nine-game schedule at some point)."<br align="left"><br align="left">
 

Maroon Eagle

All-American
May 24, 2006
17,656
7,296
102
My guesses are Sun Belt teams: Florida Atlantic, Middle Tennessee, and North Texas are looking for opponents.
Also in CUSA: East Carolina, UAB, Houston, UTEP, and, yes, Southern Missare looking for opponents.

I'm thinking it might be Middle Tennessee or North Texas since they each have two openings in their schedules-- if fbsschedules.com is accurate.
 

Coach34

Redshirt
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
lower guarantees for them than other schools, easy win for us, and also keeps the money in-state- helping the lower institutions.
 

maroonmania

Senior
Feb 23, 2008
11,053
700
113
because if you have a championship game between divisional winners within the conference, per NCAA rules, you have to have a complete round robin within each division unless you get a special waiver.
 

Canis

Redshirt
Mar 3, 2008
87
0
0
The Texags.com guy seems to think they will play in Starkville.

<div class="tweet-row"><div class="tweet-user-block">

<div class="tweet-user-block-name">
@billyliucci
<span class="tweet-user-block-full-name">Billy Liucci
</span></div></div></div><div class="tweet-row"><div class="tweet-text tweet-text-large">In unrelated A&M
football news, hearing that Ags' 2012 home schedule could include LSU,
'Bama, Arkansas, UF. Should be smooth sailing!</div></div>

I'm not so sure though as that seems like an incredibly unbalanced home/away rotation.
 

PBRME

All-Conference
Feb 12, 2004
10,522
3,846
113
Can't count 1AA wins towards bowl eligibility in back to back years.
 

GhostOfJackie

Senior
Apr 20, 2009
3,690
574
113
One of their message boards was talking about it. I'm all for getting that experiment out of the way.
 

maroonmania

Senior
Feb 23, 2008
11,053
700
113
otherwise we start the year off at 0-1 with respect to gaining bowl eligibility and that is not acceptable. Someone needs to verify if that is actually the rule though.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
54,401
22,400
113
Next year we play Jackson State and South Alabama. USA is in the process of moving up to I-A and will complete that by 2013. However, we will be able to count that as a I-A game in 2012 since that is their transition year. The only way we would have to win 7 games to go to a bowl next year would be if the 12th team that we still haven't added was another I-AA team.
 

AFDawg

Senior
Apr 28, 2010
3,263
469
83
<div>I don't see an "every other year" rule. Maybe there's something I'm missing.</div><div>
</div><div>18.7.2.2 Contest Status. [FBS] A contest shall be licensed only if it serves the purpose of providing a national contest between deserving teams. A “deserving team” shall be defined as one that has won a number of</div><div>games against Football Bowl Subdivision opponents that is equal to or greater than the number of its overall</div><div>losses. Tie games do not count in determining a team’s won-lost record. Further, when forfeiture of a regularseason football victory is required by the Committee on Infractions or a conference, or is self-imposed by an</div><div>institution as a result of a violation of NCAA rules, neither of the competing institutions may count that contest</div><div>in satisfying the definition of a “deserving team.” (Revised: 10/18/89, 10/12/93, 4/20/99, 12/15/06, 4/29/10 effective 8/1/10, 7/30/10)</div><div>18.7.2.2.1 Exception—Football Championship Subdivision Opponent. [FBS] Each year, a Football Bowl Subdivision institution may count one victory against a Football Championship Subdivision opponent toward meeting the definition of a “deserving team,” provided the opponent has averaged 90 percent</div><div>of the permissible maximum number of grants-in-aid per year in football during a rolling two-year period.</div><div>(Adopted: 10/28/97 effective 8/1/98, Revised: 4/28/05, 12/15/06, 4/29/10 effective 8/1/10, 7/30/10)</div><div>18.7.2.2.1.1 Waiver. [FBS] The Football Issues Committee may approve a waiver of the 90 percent</div><div>requirement to permit a Football Bowl Subdivision institution to count a victory against a Football</div><div>Championship Subdivision opponent toward meeting the definition of a “deserving team,” if a unique</div><div>or catastrophic situation affects the Football Championship Subdivision institution’s ability to average</div><div>90 percent of the permissible maximum number of football grants-in-aid per year during a rolling twoyear period. (Adopted: 8/11/98, Revised: 4/28/05, 12/15/06, 4/29/10 effective 8/1/10, 7/30/10)</div><div>18.7.2.2.2 Waiver for Conference Champion. [FBS] The Leadership Council, by a two-thirds majority of its members present and voting, or a committee designated by the Leadership Council, may approve a waiver of the definition of a “deserving team,” to enable a conference champion to participate in a</div><div>bowl game when the conference champion is scheduled contractually to participate in the game. (Adopted:</div><div>1/12/93, Revised: 10/28/97, 11/1/07 effective 8/1/08, 4/29/10 effective 8/1/10, 7/30/10)</div>
 

vhdawg

All-Conference
Sep 29, 2004
4,315
1,691
113
PBRME said:
Can't count 1AA wins towards bowl eligibility in back to back years.

There used to be a rule that you could only count one every four years, but that went away in the early 2000s. Now the only rule is you can only count one per year. I think Ole Miss had a situation in 2009 (?) where they had to play two I-AA teams, and only one counted toward bowl eligibility.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
54,401
22,400
113
Whether or not we would have been one of those 4, who knows. As for the NCAA rule, in practice that counts as a full round-robin. The MAC has been doing it for years.
 

MedDawg

Senior
May 29, 2001
4,930
574
113
Canis said:
The Texags.com guy seems to think they will play in Starkville.

<div class="tweet-row"><div class="tweet-user-block">
<div class="tweet-user-block-name">@billyliucci <span class="tweet-user-block-full-name">Billy Liucci </span></div></div></div><div class="tweet-row"><div class="tweet-text tweet-text-large">In unrelated A&M football news, hearing that Ags' 2012 home schedule could include LSU, 'Bama, Arkansas, UF. Should be smooth sailing!</div></div>

I'm not so sure though as that seems like an incredibly unbalanced home/away rotation.

Did that guy just write that having LSU, Bama, Arkansas, and Florida at home = smooth sailing? Talk about delusional. That means the 'beatable' SEC teams are all away for them. They may not win5 games next year.
 

BiscuitEater

Redshirt
Aug 29, 2009
4,178
0
36
PBRME said:
Can't count 1AA wins towards bowl eligibility in back to back years.


Think a team can count ONE win each year ... at least 'corrding to wikipedia ...


Under current regulations, the NCAA allows one victory per season over a Division I FCS (formerly I-AA) team to count toward an FBS team's bowl eligibility, so long as the FCS team has supplied financial aid for football averaging out to at least 56.7 full scholarships (90% of the limit of 63 allowed to FCS schools) over "a rolling two-year period" that can include the current season.


Biscuit
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
54,401
22,400
113
They've all got some serious financial issues and they're no threat at all to us, so why not help them out.Also I think that's something that legislators and college board members will remember.
 

PBRME

All-Conference
Feb 12, 2004
10,522
3,846
113
I don't think it was the early 2000's because the talk in 07 was about that rule until we won our 7th game. Apparently it has changed though.
 

shotgunDawg

Redshirt
Nov 13, 2011
2,035
0
0
I don't think you will ever see the SEC go to a 9 game schedule because I don't believe there is any benefit to it. Here are the negatives:

1. It would unbalance the home and away schedule for conference games. 5 at home, 4 away, and vice versa
2. All SEC games are on TV now already, and there really isn't a week during the season that there isn't enough big-time SEC games to fill out the major TV time slots. So what the point of more?
3. Most importantly, due to the league competition, the SEC is already having trouble filling out its' bowl slots, and with a 9th game the SEC would likely lose millions of dollars because less teams would qualify for bowls.

I just don't see any reasons for a 9th game. Am I missing something?
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
54,401
22,400
113
I suspect you would be a last resort for us though and we'd insist on a 1-year guarantee game and not at an astronomical price.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
54,401
22,400
113
The game in Hattiesburg is in 2015 though, so it would be in 2012 and 2015. I'd actually prefer to do that than to play you in consecutive years.</p>