2026 NCAA Championship Session IV Thread

HOA242n!

Senior
Aug 18, 2025
221
550
93
Good morning. I slept on it. Still don't like. Lol Time will tell but his issue isn't the ability to get on offense, or lack of talent or strength or size or anything. It's game plan and style. He and duke both learned a brutal lesson at the worst time. Never let your opponent take it to SV. I'll stay bullish on blaze. Especially cause he may be the only one from the group of freshman that can even hold 133 long term.
Sounds so stupid, but I genuinely had a poor night's sleep because of Duke. He has been my favorite guy to watch this season. Except for a handful of matches this season, he just physically imposed his will on opponents; the real world version of Brian Schute. I basically penciled him in to major his way through the tournament. In another thread I think I gave Blaze a 10% chance of standing atop the podium this weekend, so his loss didn't surprise me.

I'll stand by another opinion: I think it would be best if both Blaze and Duke redshirt next year and prepare to move up a weight class. Whether it was the cut or something else, Duke needs to work on that gas tank.
 

LB99

Heisman
Oct 27, 2021
9,925
14,455
113
One of them - the least impressive of the bunch - is a redshirt. There's no denying it, Forrest and Vega are problems moving forward.
Yes, but I’m sure others are saying Blaze and Duke are problems moving forward and PSU returns the entire lineup next year minus Levi. PSU will be fine. Will the team race be a little closer? Yes, most likely. Will the final results be different, probably not.
 

LB99

Heisman
Oct 27, 2021
9,925
14,455
113
Call me crazy but i feel caliendo has been preparing for this match all year look for a close one
You’re crazy. 😂 I honestly don’t think Caliendo has much say in the outcome. Mitchell has his way with him and Caliendo looks defeated mentally against Mitchell. Take away Mitchell and Caliendo probably has multiple B1G titles and an NCAA title. He just doesn’t have the recipe to beat Mitchell and he knows that himself. Strangely, I almost feel bad for Caliendo. He seems like a likeable guy and a hell of a wrestler.
 
Last edited:

Cali_Nittany1

All-Conference
Dec 11, 2019
667
2,850
93
Call me crazy but i feel caliendo has been preparing for this match all year look for a close one

 

Scam likely

Senior
Nov 3, 2022
297
602
93
I addressed this earlier.

In college (and HS; that was changed @ 2 years ago to match college rules), in sudden victory, you make the call to stop the match when points are attained by one of the wrestlers. The ONLY exception is if the defensive wrestler is in near-fall criteria. If they are, so as not to disadvantage the offensive wrestler's team from picking up bonus points, you don't stop the match. If a pin is attained, then you stop it then. If the defensive wrestler goes out of near-fall criteria, you stop it then.

As Robideau was not in near-fall criteria when the ref determined that a TD had been attained by Duke, he would have been wrong to not blow the whistle, and let the match continue.
The mat ref made 2 errors , number 1 he called a take down that according to review was not a take down and 2 he called it to early not allowing pj's to improve his position to take any doubt of it being a takedown.if this wasn't over time it probably would have been a 7 pt move.
 

HOA242n!

Senior
Aug 18, 2025
221
550
93
Yes, but I’m sure others are saying Blaze and Duke are problems moving forward and PSU returns the entire lineup next year minus Levi. PSU will be fine. Will the team race be a little closer? Yes, most likely. Will the final results be different, probably not.
Next year's team may break the points record for a 3rd consecutive year. '28 is going to be closer than it has been in a while.
 

Lyons212

Senior
Mar 9, 2017
113
427
63
The mat ref made 2 errors , number 1 he called a take down that according to review was not a take down and 2 he called it to early not allowing pj's to improve his position to take any doubt of it being a takedown.if this wasn't over time it probably would have been a 7 pt move.
Then the reviewers complicated the error by overturning a TD. At that point Duke was emotionally done. At a minimum, a rule change is necessary to allow the action to continue in OT. In that sequence occurs in regulation, action continues and most likely Duke has a 7 point move.
 

Lil Nicky Scarfo

All-Conference
Jul 1, 2025
1,341
3,829
113
One of them - the least impressive of the bunch - is a redshirt. There's no denying it, Forrest and Vega are problems moving forward.
Now that DT is filling the roster completely, it’ll be a battle. You might have both teams scoring 150+ very soon. Forrest is a no-doubter champion or finalist with 25+ point potential every year - like Mitchell. He’s different from a Vega who, while excellent, is not that same level of monster in a tournament setting. I think we have some guys like James who will take over the bonus point mantle from Mitchell when needed - and we’ll need to keep signing guys like that.

All things being almost equal going forward, I love being situated surrounded by and in Pa, NY, NJ, and Ohio in contrast to Texas, Kansas, Arkansas, etc.

And if Ono is close to who we think he might be, next year will be truly transcendent.
 

WV lion

All-Conference
Oct 17, 2021
1,386
1,903
113
Call me crazy but i feel caliendo has been preparing for this match all year look for a close one
Last time they met, looked like ccs
Call me crazy but i feel caliendo has been preparing for this match all year look for a close one
Last time they met, it looked like caliendo has given up all hope of beating mesenbrink
 

LB99

Heisman
Oct 27, 2021
9,925
14,455
113
The mat ref made 2 errors , number 1 he called a take down that according to review was not a take down and 2 he called it to early not allowing pj's to improve his position to take any doubt of it being a takedown.if this wasn't over time it probably would have been a 7 pt move.
Who was the ref? I don’t want to see him tonight. He should’ve allowed to take part in the finals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Pitchfork Rebel

o_Grass

All-Conference
Oct 28, 2021
874
3,310
93
Really? It isn't like Davino has done much to him...He's older and has an extra year in a college room. I will wager a lot that blaze has a substantially higher ceiling than Davino. Kids younger than Jax Forrest. Hell, he's two months younger than bo basset.
Not only that, but he appears to be the most under developed (physically) of all of them.
 

watoos

All-Conference
Oct 31, 2021
631
1,224
93
Duke in that match reminded me of Kasak last year against Joey Blaze. You knew he was the better wrestler but lost. And both of them handed Taylor a Natty in the process.
My glasses aren’t tinted blue, Blaze lost, couldn’t finish a takedown, PJ was flat out robbed, I don’t give a darn, in my mind, which counts for nothing, PJ won.
 

lemonears

Senior
Oct 31, 2021
440
825
93
Assuming you mean 27-28 season I’d say no especially if Ono has two years eligibility

Good luck beating a collection including following: (Too early to specify weights and wrestlers)

luke
Ono
Blaze
Desmond
Shepherd
Kasak
Duke
James
Henckel
Welsh
Barr
Mirasola
Where does Landon Sidun fit in?
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Pitchfork Rebel

watoos

All-Conference
Oct 31, 2021
631
1,224
93
I addressed this earlier.

In college (and HS; that was changed @ 2 years ago to match college rules), in sudden victory, you make the call to stop the match when points are attained by one of the wrestlers. The ONLY exception is if the defensive wrestler is in near-fall criteria. If they are, so as not to disadvantage the offensive wrestler's team from picking up bonus points, you don't stop the match. If a pin is attained, then you stop it then. If the defensive wrestler goes out of near-fall criteria, you stop it then.

As Robideau was not in near-fall criteria when the ref determined that a TD had been attained by Duke, he would have been wrong to not blow the whistle, and let the match continue.
I was 2 rows off the mat, thought PJ had a cradle, if he did I guess the ref should have let it continue, most refs I see let the match continue for possible bonus points, pin. I assume then that PJ didn’t have the cradle locked up but was certainly in great position for the takedown. I see no reason for reaction time to be involved. What I want to know is did the revue simply say no control? In other words the ref made a terrible mistake for blowing the whistle, I also think the ref made a 2nd mistake because it sure as heck looked to me like PJ was on the verge of back points. To me it was a situation that the ref made 2 mistakes not one as you claim.
 

Shifty15

Senior
Nov 4, 2016
206
416
63
Once again, I think the mat ref was absolutely correct to stop the action and call the takedown when he did. In fact, if anything, he gave a couple of seconds for "reaction time" before calling it. As soon as the cradle was locked and Robideau was on his hip, it was a takedown and action is immediately stopped in sudden victory. It would be different if Robideau had been taken to his back DURING the takedown, but that wasn't the case. The failure here was with the review and not with the mat ref. I'm still spitting mad about this. And I almost hate to say it because I've never been "that guy", but you almost wonder if the fix wasn't in, because I can't imagine why or how the review officials could have overturned that given the totality of circumstances involved. I want the NCAA to answer to this and anything other than a complete mea culpa, we were wrong won't be satisfactory.
Hence the reason that some are wondering if betting is somehow having an impact! Not saying so, but it makes you wonder.
 

pbohan1

Redshirt
Oct 30, 2021
24
31
13
I do not comment much on these boards but the Duke match deserves a comment. Let me play Devil's advocate. Perhaps Duke did not have a td per the college ambiguous standard. However, perhaps if the ref let it play out Duke would have had a td in 5 or 10 seconds or even a pin. Duke was robbed of that situation. You ever notice how NFL refs let a situation like a fumble or int play out so they do not rob a team of the situation. The ref and replay in this situation to me is unfair because Duke was robbed of that situation. In these scenarios the call must stand, it is like an inadvertent whistle in the NFL, Robideau deserves credit for winning, but perhaps a young man was robbed of that opportunity. I apologize if this was covered but I do not read all the posts. It seems the strategy for some to win bouts is to get to ride outs, does this truly reward the best wrestler?
 
May 5, 2023
190
204
43
I addressed this earlier.

In college (and HS; that was changed @ 2 years ago to match college rules), in sudden victory, you make the call to stop the match when points are attained by one of the wrestlers. The ONLY exception is if the defensive wrestler is in near-fall criteria. If they are, so as not to disadvantage the offensive wrestler's team from picking up bonus points, you don't stop the match. If a pin is attained, then you stop it then. If the defensive wrestler goes out of near-fall criteria, you stop it then.

As Robideau was not in near-fall criteria when the ref determined that a TD had been attained by Duke, he would have been wrong to not blow the whistle, and let the match continue.
There have been refs that have been wrong in college and h.s. both this year.
 

WEAREPSU_LI

All-Conference
Feb 15, 2019
446
1,586
93
Competition is a good thing. Penn State wrestlers will be better for it.
I agree. It's been really ******* great, but it will be even moreso when we can beat DT each year. Rivalry makes it that much more exciting. How fun is it already to be beat Manning, Tan Tom, and the Brands. Add DT to the mix and it will be that much better.