I’m not the one claiming this a killer portal class genius.Then perhaps you should reserve judgment.
I’m not the one claiming this a killer portal class genius.Then perhaps you should reserve judgment.
Which has happened forever...Please stop. I’m 73 and have watched a lot of football over the years. The lack of football fundamentals, especially tackling, is atrocious. Guys repeatedly, including if not especially, in the NFL who throw their bodies at runners and receivers rather than wrapping up is rampant these days.
I am since I’m not claiming it’s a “killer” portal class Big Guy.Then perhaps you should reserve judgment.
Recruiting will take 2nd fiddle, Indiana has proved it out, There is no need to throw tons of money at some 7on7 High schooler when that guy will probably portal out the next year if he doesn't like his situation.I think the “moneyball” conversation needs to have conclusions that are held loosely until we start seeing how this staff handles their first full high school recruiting class with greater level of resources than they’ve ever had—that will remain the lifeblood of this program.
I get the early sense that they might appear to play moneyball at certain positions at times while at other positions they will be willing to spend more.
I keep going back to what Rocco Becht said when he committed: something has changed in Campbell since he arrived at PSU, and Becht said this in context of the greater levels of resources and backing he now has to truly do what he wants to do. So, let’s see how they run things over time.
Speaking of homerism, there were some posters whining loudly when some of their sentimental PSU favorites hit the portal. All of a sudden Grunk is a Dan Marino esque QB, one career sack Chaz Coleman is the next Abdul Carter, Amare Campbell is a great LB, DT Gilliam is great, etc. If Penn State’s outgoing players were that great, how did the team end up near the bottom tier of the B1G with a 3-6 conference record. Not a single Penn State defensive player made the all B1G defense team selected by B1G coaches. The internal bias of overrating our own players is off the charts.
Bill Parcells: “You are what your record says you are”. This quote is so true.
another dumb takeDid you check the resume of the incoming players? Bc, Syracuse, ISU, wvu, Colorado, UCLA,. Anyone from a playoff team?

I agree with this to a degree, but also remember guys are so cautious due to targeting, they’re afraid to tackle. Also, tackling form has been changed and you can’t just fly in trying to kill the other guy. The game has changed and that has changed tackling and other fundamentals.Please stop. I’m 73 and have watched a lot of football over the years. The lack of football fundamentals, especially tackling, is atrocious. Guys repeatedly, including if not especially, in the NFL who throw their bodies at runners and receivers rather than wrapping up is rampant these days.
So any team that doesn’t make the playoffs has no talent available…got it. We didnt make the playoffs, so we shouldn’t keep any of our guys.Did you check the resume of the incoming players? Bc, Syracuse, ISU, wvu, Colorado, UCLA,. Anyone from a playoff team?
Mostly volume.
Ps. The players leaving probably have more value than incoming.
Actually I'm waiting for him to hype up Lance Lonergan (does he even know who that is) as the best option to portal if it existed then since being on championship team automatically anoints you as a stud player.. no offense to Lance of courseSo any team that doesn’t make the playoffs has no talent available…got it. We didnt make the playoffs, so we shouldn’t keep any of our guys.
Dude, most of the transfers coming from playoff teams are backups demanding oodles of money. Why? The starters on those teams are staying and the backups think they’re worth more than they are because of their high school recruiting ranking.Did you check the resume of the incoming players? Bc, Syracuse, ISU, wvu, Colorado, UCLA,. Anyone from a playoff team?
There is some merit to this for sure. But that doesn’t explain the failure to wrap when tacklers aren’t hitting someone in the head.I agree with this to a degree, but also remember guys are so cautious due to targeting, they’re afraid to tackle. Also, tackling form has been changed and you can’t just fly in trying to kill the other guy. The game has changed and that has changed tackling and other fundamentals.
No unlike you I actually watched those games. Why doesn’t Your Highness explain to me why Indiana’s team is so fundamentally sound?Which has happened forever...
Again nostalgia blinds you
What games do you think you watched that I didn't. Football in the 60s?No unlike you I actually watched those games. Why doesn’t Your Highness explain to me why Indiana’s team is so fundamentally sound?
OBVIOUSLY., paying
student-athletes () has been good for “college“ football (
).
![]()
Never said players didn’t miss tackles years ago. What I said was that the lack of tackling fundamentals is far worse today than in the past. By the way, what does procedural penalties and dropped passes have to do with tackling? Geez.What games do you think you watched that I didn't. Football in the 60s?
They aren't. Indiana misses tackles, Indiana has procedural penalties, Indiana has drops....like everyone. They are well coached and they limit mistakes. Next you'll be telling me Penn State didn't miss any tackles in 82 or 86
Lots of bodies in the RB room, would be hard to get on the field next year. Disappointing because he is a very good back. I would have preferred they kept Hayes and cut Wallace. Wallace's injury history makes him a poor investment to keep on the rosye
In my best Allan Iverson voice, "We talkin Charlotte!" Charlotte? We talkin Charlotte!"I'm act
I'm speechless on this one
This is ridiculous. You don't have an argument (per usual) so you change it. Now you're saying on tackling has changed...which is you understood the rule changes you'd comprehend whyNever said players didn’t miss tackles years ago. What I said was that the lack of tackling fundamentals is far worse today than in the past. By the way, what does procedural penalties and dropped passes have to do with tackling? Geez.
I get it, but former 5 Star to Charlotte???? At least a few or our formers to Temple.He wants to play
Oh and looking at their record, he should play there! Lost to Temple 49-14 and were 0-8 in Conference...yeeshI get it, but former 5 Star to Charlotte???? At least a few or our formers to Temple.
Respectfully, I do not think what Cignetti is doing is going to fundamentally change Campbell's process. This year, and possibly extending to next year, will be the aberration for Campbell's hyper usage of the portal, not the norm. Matt Campbell is the type of coach who invests in relationships and relishes in the process of building a program from the ground up. It is why he took a really long time to finally leave a very difficult place to win at. It is why he is taking more of his old program's players—players he recruited—than any other coach. Expect the norm to prioritize high school recruiting with the supplement of productive portal players each year. What I think will be similar to Cignetti is how Campbell's staff will prefer production over potential in the players they target in their evaluation process—both in high school and in the portal.Recruiting will take 2nd fiddle, Indiana has proved it out, There is no need to throw tons of money at some 7on7 High schooler when that guy will probably portal out the next year if he doesn't like his situation.
Players entering their 3-4th year will be prizes to be had. ironically HighSchoolers thought they hit the jackpot when NIL has come into play thinking "they's gonna get paid" (yes some still will) but it wont be as many as they and their parents thought . I think this system will normalize to valuing experience is more important than HS star ratings ..... I would short recruiting services or their parent companies
Let's start with the transfer portal and the high school piece of it. I think one of the great reasons being here is, boy, you're in the most fertile ground of the excellence of high school football in a six-to-eight-hour radius. Everything will start with building high school football and continuing to do a great job in this state and our surrounding states. Nobody is going to attack more than us.
Transfer portal obviously has become a unique advantage probably in some ways and sometimes can be a disadvantage. If you look at our history the last couple years, Jayden Higgins was maybe the 40th ranked transfer portal guy and Jayden Higgins was the No. 1 receiver taken in the draft last year. In offensive tackle, Jalen Travis, who was drafted by the Colts, No. 40 in the transfer portal, was the first transfer portal offensive tackle taken.
We have a process. We know what we're looking for in the transfer portal and have to use that to continue to supplement our football team.
this didnt age wellHe wants to play

Ok you can go that route wont be successful with that strategy point being thats how every school has tried to do it from day one pre portalRespectfully, I do not think what Cignetti is doing is going to fundamentally change Campbell's process. This year, and possibly extending to next year, will be the aberration for Campbell's hyper usage of the portal, not the norm. Matt Campbell is the type of coach who invests in relationships and relishes in the process of building a program from the ground up. It is why he took a really long time to finally leave a very difficult place to win at. It is why he is taking more of his old program's players—players he recruited—than any other coach. Expect the norm to prioritize high school recruiting with the supplement of productive portal players each year. What I think will be similar to Cignetti is how Campbell's staff will prefer production over potential in the players they target in their evaluation process—both in high school and in the portal.
Here is how Campbell addressed the issue in his introductory PSU press conference:
I don't see much difference between Temple and Charlotte. Both are in the AAC. Remember Tim Albin had a ton of success at Ohio and is rebuilding Charlotte.I get it, but former 5 Star to Charlotte???? At least a few or our formers to Temple.
Ok you can go that route wont be successful with that strategy point being thats how every school has tried to do it from day one pre portal
post portal the playing board and rules have changed
1) this fanbase gonna wait around 6 years for MC to develop his next classes to stud seniors and see what shakes out? PSU own AD said he wants to win now, you don't do that developing players for 4 years MC has 6-7 years to get it done else we move on.
2)He's taking his old programs players because he has to, not only because of lack of roster but also the new place is unfamiliar he needs familiarity to keep the hounds at bay
As much as we want to see him retain and develop players his players will be no more different and portal out like any other school, especially if they are still snot dribbling high schoolers looking for paydays because of either of their entitled upbringing or their parents wishes
Systems either change or die and Coaches and Fans views will have to as well.
Your explanation of how MC operates will be successful if there is actual skin in the game for players as in contracts come to fruition and are enforced. Else any player can say F'off I want better. to invoke Moneyball
I agree with this to a degree, but also remember guys are so cautious due to targeting, they’re afraid to tackle. Also, tackling form has been changed and you can’t just fly in trying to kill the other guy. The game has changed and that has changed tackling and other fundamentals.
Really? Do some research and see the score when the played last year.I don't see much difference between Temple and Charlotte. Both are in the AAC. Remember Tim Albin had a ton of success at Ohio and is rebuilding Charlotte.
He can go to Charlotte for a year, dominate hopefully then have his pick of schools. It's a calculated risk
Again--both in the same conference. Both finished under 500. Temple was better last year but that means nothing going into 2026Really? Do some research and see the score when the played last year.
Not directing this at you, just adding on to your post. I feel issue is not “expectations” but rather some will have “unrealistic expectations”. Even if say team goes 8-4 next season and 9-3 next, there will be a level of impatience from some. I’m sure some will already be calling for change because they are {insert here}.First off, that is harsh. Dayton is a great poster here. Like Dayton, I wanted Grunk as #1 as well. I now realize that with such expectations placed on a new coach like Campbell and the need to have a degree of year one success for a variety of reasons, most coaches will go with the QB that already is successful in their system. Supposedly they did want to retain Grunk, but he understandably wants to be a starter.
You really need to look in the mirror and get over the fact that you are frequently wrong but never in doubly. I consistently said that tackling fundamentals are worse today than years ago not that players years ago never missed tackles. YOU are the one who consistently changes the argument when you lose such as when you make the idiotic claim that procedural penalties and dropped passes somehow are relevant to tackling fundamentals. My God.This is ridiculous. You don't have an argument (per usual) so you change it. Now you're saying on tackling has changed...which is you understood the rule changes you'd comprehend why
Respectfully, I do not think what Cignetti is doing is going to fundamentally change Campbell's process. This year, and possibly extending to next year, will be the aberration for Campbell's hyper usage of the portal, not the norm. Matt Campbell is the type of coach who invests in relationships and relishes in the process of building a program from the ground up. It is why he took a really long time to finally leave a very difficult place to win at. It is why he is taking more of his old program's players—players he recruited—than any other coach. Expect the norm to prioritize high school recruiting with the supplement of productive portal players each year. What I think will be similar to Cignetti is how Campbell's staff will prefer production over potential in the players they target in their evaluation process—both in high school and in the portal.
Here is how Campbell addressed the issue in his introductory PSU press conference:
Let's assume that 1,000 kids were involuntary portals, that leaves 3,000 looking for a new home and more playing time and/or more money. It seems like many of them have"agents".Surely out of over 4,000 kids, that will be the case.
Did you see where some of PSU’s recruits are landing, if anywhere at all?Did you check the resume of the incoming players? Bc, Syracuse, ISU, wvu, Colorado, UCLA,. Anyone from a playoff team?
another dumb take
check out last years 25th ranked incoming portal class maybe 1-2 players from recognized teams and one with a significant impact
amazes me that you think you need to have 25 studs on a team you ever play team sports ?
and too add not a playoff team
View attachment 1134520