Toggle sidebar

5 minute warning

M

Mntneer

Sophomore
Oct 7, 2001
10,192
196
0
DvlDog4WVU said:
It just means that states will have to issue CCWs providing the applicant pays the processing fee. As it stood, the burden of necessity was placed on the individual in some of these states. That’s no longer the case. “May” issue is now “shall” issue. The restrictive states go to being like what the constitutional carry states were before constitutional carry.
Click to expand...

Could also help with firearm transportation between states. Like if I have to drive to Morgantown and have to go through parts of Maryland.
 
S

Snuffy Smif

Freshman
Jun 15, 2001
5,989
75
48
 
bornaneer

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
30,911
1,612
113
Mntneer said:
Could also help with firearm transportation between states. Like if I have to drive to Morgantown and have to go through parts of Maryland.
Click to expand...
I had no problem years ago.....told by MD State Police had to be unloaded.
 
M

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,840
275
83
That's all very interesting as long as Repubs don't use the ruling to increase pollution and/or CO2 emissions and odds of that are zero.
 
M

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,840
275
83
TarHeelEer said:
Oh, so you liked being king. Got it.
Click to expand...
It was a bold move putting that in place but it was the right thing to do. Too many people can't see past next quarter's earnings or who don't care about the planet or future generations. We will look to Europe then for leadership on climate change.
 
R

roadtrasheer

All-Conference
Sep 9, 2016
18,129
2,197
113
moe said:
It was a bold move putting that in place but it was the right thing to do. Too many people can't see past next quarter's earnings or who don't care about the planet or future generations. We will look to Europe then for leadership on climate change.
Click to expand...
Never thought I'd ever agree with you on anything. Greedy corporations don't give 2 ***** about us nor does the same ones making it in other countries to by pass the EPA & taxes. It's up to Congress to write laws not some bureaucracy. Supreme court was right again
 
C

CAJUNEER_rivals

Redshirt
May 29, 2001
72,872
44
0
Snuffy Smif said:
Click to expand...
I can't believe this went a year without correction. The right to bear arms is a secondary right based on a person's right to life. In other words, people have a right to protect their own lives. The right to life is a primary right endowed to all people by their Creator. The right to bear arms to protect one's life is a secondary right based on the right to life. It would be inconsistent for SCOTUS to say people have a right to bear arms and a child doesn't have a right to life. All red pill.
 
S

SoCo

Senior
May 29, 2001
35,815
514
113
CAJUNEER said:
I can't believe this went a year without correction. The right to bear arms is a secondary right based on a person's right to life. In other words, people have a right to protect their own lives. The right to life is a primary right endowed to all people by their Creator. The right to bear arms to protect one's life is a secondary right based on the right to life. It would be inconsistent for SCOTUS to say people have a right to bear arms and a child doesn't have a right to life. All red pill.
Click to expand...
If only a fetus was a child.

Trust the science
 
S

SoCo

Senior
May 29, 2001
35,815
514
113
CAJUNEER said:
What scientific evidence suggests a fetus is not a child?

I’m surprised you liked that, @30CAT.
Click to expand...
it’s the same evidence that says a boy isn’t a girl. Funny how you idiots change the definitions and trust the science when convenient.

try having a backbone.
 
Airport

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,194
6,857
113
CAJUNEER said:
I can't believe this went a year without correction. The right to bear arms is a secondary right based on a person's right to life. In other words, people have a right to protect their own lives. The right to life is a primary right endowed to all people by their Creator. The right to bear arms to protect one's life is a secondary right based on the right to life. It would be inconsistent for SCOTUS to say people have a right to bear arms and a child doesn't have a right to life. All red pill.
Click to expand...
There are times when I wish my education was better rounded than all the science I was required to take. This summation is something I have never heard and much better written than the three liberal women of the SC could opine. While I believe the horse was let out of the barn with abortion, there should be some reasonable restraint on time to decide.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom