9 game redshirt rule ???

QuaoarsKing

All-Conference
Mar 11, 2008
5,867
2,513
113
Ridiculous. Just go to 5 years eligibility. Heck we’ve got a lot of 6-year players even with the current rules.
Exactly. 5 year clock from the player's high school graduation. After that, too bad, even if he was hurt some or just wasn't good enough to get into games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DerHntr and patdog

SorryDog

Redshirt
Nov 29, 2010
74
39
18
Or install an age limit. Grown men shouldn't be playing with 18 year olds and 25-26 year old men shouldn't be at frat parties with 18 year old girls.
Call it the Mormon rule. They've been winning off 26 year olds for years and years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: onewoof

STATEgrad04

Senior
Mar 3, 2008
674
620
93
karate fail GIF
 

aTotal360

Heisman
Nov 12, 2009
21,707
14,320
113
They did 9 games for a specific reason. And I like it...


A number of coaches pushed for a more expansive approach -- a full five years of playing time in a five-year window. However, concerns about potential litigation in the wake of some controversial eligibility rulings, chief among them Ole Miss quarterback Trinidad Chambliss -- led the group to the nine-game compromise.
 

bulldoghair

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2013
2,431
1,925
108
So a P4 starter could be rested for the 3 weakest opponents and still be considered a redshirt. Or if you’re 6-3, not making the playoffs anyway, you just bench all of your starters and you get a whole extra year of eligibility for your whole entire roster. (Granted, if you could pay and keep them all another year)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: TPB314

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,617
25,920
113
They did 9 games for a specific reason. And I like it...


A number of coaches pushed for a more expansive approach -- a full five years of playing time in a five-year window. However, concerns about potential litigation in the wake of some controversial eligibility rulings, chief among them Ole Miss quarterback Trinidad Chambliss -- led the group to the nine-game compromise.
That’s why they need to just go to 5 years. If you step on the field at all, that’s 1 year. No exceptions or waivers.
 

Seinfeld

All-American
Nov 30, 2006
11,101
6,916
113
They did 9 games for a specific reason. And I like it...


A number of coaches pushed for a more expansive approach -- a full five years of playing time in a five-year window. However, concerns about potential litigation in the wake of some controversial eligibility rulings, chief among them Ole Miss quarterback Trinidad Chambliss -- led the group to the nine-game compromise.
I love how they label the Chambliss ruling as controversial. There was absolutely nothing in the current guidelines that should’ve allowed him to play, and just because OM fans would’ve loved to get another year out of him, it doesn’t make the decision controversial
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,617
25,920
113
I love how they label the Chambliss ruling as controversial. There was absolutely nothing in the current guidelines that should’ve allowed him to play, and just because OM fans would’ve loved to get another year out of him, it doesn’t make the decision controversial
How so? He’s only played 3 seasons. NCAA is going to lose this case.
 

Seinfeld

All-American
Nov 30, 2006
11,101
6,916
113
How so? He’s only played 3 seasons. NCAA is going to lose this case.
Because the current rules don't say anything about how many seasons he actually played. He was redshirted in '21, he was on an active roster in '22 and '23, he broke out in '24, and then he blew up at OM in '25. His 5 years are up

Unless I'm mistaken, the only chance he has is to convince someone that either '22 or '23 should've been a medical year which at least seems like a case of revisionist history at this point
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,617
25,920
113
Because the current rules don't say anything about how many seasons he actually played. He was redshirted in '21, he was on an active roster in '22 and '23, he broke out in '24, and then he blew up at OM in '25. His 5 years are up

Unless I'm mistaken, the only chance he has is to convince someone that either '22 or '23 should've been a medical year which at least seems like a case of revisionist history at this point
Wow! Crazy that guy couldn’t even get on the field for 3 years in Div II. I still bet a Mississippi judge gives him an injunction & then he can just drop the lawsuit in December.
 

bulldoghair

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2013
2,431
1,925
108
Because the current rules don't say anything about how many seasons he actually played. He was redshirted in '21, he was on an active roster in '22 and '23, he broke out in '24, and then he blew up at OM in '25. His 5 years are up

Unless I'm mistaken, the only chance he has is to convince someone that either '22 or '23 should've been a medical year which at least seems like a case of revisionist history at this point
He’s claiming he had some Tonsillitis in freshman season and appeared in only 2 games.
 

Dawg1976

All-Conference
Aug 22, 2012
8,121
2,632
113
Let them play forever….no cap on age or years in ‘college’. It’s basically professional football anyway.
 

DawgNsuds

Junior
Jun 4, 2007
622
226
43
Let them play forever….no cap on age or years in ‘college’. It’s basically professional football anyway.
If my memory is correct, they reason that was used to prohibit high schoolers and young collegiates from declaring for the NFL draft was that they were not physically ready. These subtle shifts are gonna make that argument null
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dawg1976