I will post a rebuttal... more of a defense for the situation... It was completely understandable that he cut Bailey over Sidney, unfortunately...
I think Stans was in a catch-22 with Sidney... In the Fall of 2010, this entire board, the fans, the players, everyone spent a year and a half waiting for him to become eligible to play, especially after the cluster 17 of an investigation that went into his eligibility. He proclaimed to be "The Difference.". All that aside, we invested over a year's worth of time, resources, and scholarship money to get him in an MSU uniform. In Stansbury's eyes, particularly at the time, Sidney had only been playing a few weeks (the exhibition game in Jackson was just before Christmas, the fight was during Christmas). Bailey was far more expendable than Sidney. There would be no way Stans could have justified cutting Sidney from the team over Bailey, but hindsight tells us that would have been the best decision.
You bring up a great point, though...