a good analysis of recruits and stars

[dawgs.sixpack]

http://mgoblog.com/diaries/what%E2%80%99s-5-star-really-worth-predicting-future-team-success-recruiting-rankings

<div>
</div><div>http://mgoblog.com/diaries/5-stars-first-rounders-predictably-uncertain-path-recruit-pro
</div><div>
</div><div>as i've always tried to tell the "stars don't matter" crowd, on an individual level it is more of a crapshoot. but on a bigger picture, higher rated classes correspond to better teams and better future nfl prospects. </div><div>
</div><div>this guy really puts some work into this, breaking it down by position. </div><div>
</div><div>also, worth noting, it's more important to land elite D recruits than elite offensive recruits if you wanna have success.</div>

 

[Goat Grindin]

He just spins it to whatever makes Ole Miss' class seem better at the current time.

 

[dawgs.sixpack]

there's still a sizable msu contingent that would prefer to take all the undersized dylan favre's in the world over the 5* prima donnas. they'll start listing off every unheralded recruit whose every made it big and every big name that busted.