About all of these leg breaks...

Faustdog

All-Conference
Jun 4, 2007
3,927
2,138
113
with Prothro, McRae, and Brown, are we seeing an increase in these kinds of clean leg breaks? Is it happening more often, or is it just the greater media coverage?
 

The Big Slick

Redshirt
Aug 29, 2006
678
0
0
In addition, there are alot more cameras/camera angles covering ballgames these days. The ability to see notice the severity of the break on TV depends alot on camera angles.
 

FlabLoser

Redshirt
Aug 20, 2006
10,709
0
0
I don't buy that we're just more aware with media coverage. Media has been all over college and pro football for decades. The best plays, the ugliest plays, and the most gruesome stuff have been force-fed to us (ok not forced, we're willing) for years and years and years.

I'm more included to think there's some supplement or drug that is making bones more prone to pop.

Going back, I dunno...10 years?...Ruben Mateo for the Texas Rangers had his femur snap in half just running to first base.

Prior to 1995, I'm gonna say I never heard of an athlete's leg bone snap clean in two from a non-contact injury. Recall, Theisman took a hit (or a nasty twist). But over the last 10 years or so there seem to have been a whole lot of non-contact leg snaps. Something just isn't right there.
 

Fletch Fletcher

Redshirt
Sep 25, 2006
620
0
0
I think it could be related to kids lifting weights at early ages. They put on more than a normal about of weight at an earlier age while their bones are still developing.
 

UpTheMiddlex3Punt

All-Conference
May 28, 2007
17,943
3,904
113
I would put my money on
1) More media coverage - honestly, these two teams probably wouldn't be on TV if it weren't a bowl game
2) More games - not that it's harder on players, but simply there are more opportunities for a break to happen. Going from teams having 10 games/season a couple decades ago to 13 games now results in a 30% increase in injuries
 

Faustdog

All-Conference
Jun 4, 2007
3,927
2,138
113
UpTheMiddlex3Punt said:
I would put my money on
1) More media coverage - honestly, these two teams probably wouldn't be on TV if it weren't a bowl game
2) More games - not that it's harder on players, but simply there are more opportunities for a break to happen. Going from teams having 10 games/season a couple decades ago to 13 games now results in a 30% increase in injuries.
Yeah, I'm going to see all of that and stick with questionable breeding practices.
 

LR1400

Redshirt
Oct 22, 2008
322
0
0
It is not lifting weights early in life. The chinese, poles, bulgarians, russians, etcm have had their weightlifters lifting at young ages often as young as 8 yrs old, albeit they are typically more patient about it and very methodical and progressive. They do not have these injuries, if anything, they have stronger than average bones from lifting. The key is not to lift too heavy too young.

More likely would be stress fractures caused by excessive and too high volume of running that then turn into real breaks later. This is common in Navy SEAL training where a trainee does not train enough before BUDS and has not accumulated enough volume then they hit training, the volume is ramped up a little quicker and they end up running down the beach and Bam! the leg breaks, even at the femur.
 

FlabLoser

Redshirt
Aug 20, 2006
10,709
0
0
Fletch Fletcher said:
I think it could be related to kids lifting weights at early ages. They put on more than a normal about of weight at an earlier age while their bones are still developing.
Interesting thought. Lifting causes bones to harden. The issue with lifting early is that you dont' want bones to harden when they need to be expanding with growth. In theory, lifting too early stunts growth and the bones don't grow like they should.

I have no idea what the long-term issue are with lifting to early.