Search
Log in
Register
Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
NIL Deal Tracker
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
College Draft Totals
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Culture
Sports Betting
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Get a profile. Be recruited.
New posts
Menu
Install the app
Install
On3:
Tennessee RB DeSean Bishop bet on himself and now faces tough test against Georgia
On3:
True Freshman Standouts from Week 2 of College Football
On3:
Unfiltered Takes after Week 2: John Mateer, Billy Napier, Oregon & much more
On3:
College Football Bowl Projections Week 3: Full list of matchups, playoff predictions
On3:
On3 Heisman Trophy Poll: Top 10 player rankings after Week 2
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
ACC a better fit than Big 12?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Buckaineer" data-source="post: 129582778" data-attributes="member: 1428007"><p>Well, you mention rights for more than just tv for WVU, let's look at all rights for everything for everyone.</p><p></p><p>The lowest revenues for 2015 in the SEC ( privates not shown in USA report) would be ole Miss and Miss State- and their rights licensing for everything in 2015 were at $39 and $40 million respectively.</p><p></p><p>That's ahead of Oklahoma State, WVU, Kansas, Texas Tech, ISU, and KSU for all media rights/ licensing. They are ahead of WVU by $4-$5 million already. Adding a CCG only isn't going to eliminate that gap.</p><p></p><p>Nearly all the Big Ten and SEC are ahead of the majority of the BIG 12. The PAC has several ahead of the group listed above and really only the ACC is behind in media rights but not by a wide margin.</p><p></p><p>The Big Ten is going to jump ahead soon- in 2017 by even more. Then again in 2023. The SEC with a network and a second major tie in to the Orange is likely to keep gaining and beyond 2025 they still have an increasing contract through 2034 with ESPN, their network and a new deal with CBS coming.</p><p></p><p>All other conferences in the P5 are making significantly more as a group than the BIG 12, and the ACC may actually add that network that the BIg 12 ( see OU and UT) are pretending there's no climate or market for.</p><p></p><p>The BIG 12 has nothing to get a better tv deal in 2025, will probably have declining tv ratings, exposure and less positive press. They are likely going to knock themselves out of several playoffs.</p><p></p><p>WVU and ISU may be ok with all that but OU and its fans are fed up, and UT is just biding time.</p><p></p><p>If the conference suddenly decides to try and expand in 2025, the candidates will be nearly 10 years removed from being competitive. Why would they be better then than they are now? What would be different?</p><p></p><p>No schools will be added because UT doesn't want any added. They don't want a conference network. they just want their options open, but will continue to delude whomever wants to be deluded into thinking something could happen down the road.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Buckaineer, post: 129582778, member: 1428007"] Well, you mention rights for more than just tv for WVU, let's look at all rights for everything for everyone. The lowest revenues for 2015 in the SEC ( privates not shown in USA report) would be ole Miss and Miss State- and their rights licensing for everything in 2015 were at $39 and $40 million respectively. That's ahead of Oklahoma State, WVU, Kansas, Texas Tech, ISU, and KSU for all media rights/ licensing. They are ahead of WVU by $4-$5 million already. Adding a CCG only isn't going to eliminate that gap. Nearly all the Big Ten and SEC are ahead of the majority of the BIG 12. The PAC has several ahead of the group listed above and really only the ACC is behind in media rights but not by a wide margin. The Big Ten is going to jump ahead soon- in 2017 by even more. Then again in 2023. The SEC with a network and a second major tie in to the Orange is likely to keep gaining and beyond 2025 they still have an increasing contract through 2034 with ESPN, their network and a new deal with CBS coming. All other conferences in the P5 are making significantly more as a group than the BIG 12, and the ACC may actually add that network that the BIg 12 ( see OU and UT) are pretending there's no climate or market for. The BIG 12 has nothing to get a better tv deal in 2025, will probably have declining tv ratings, exposure and less positive press. They are likely going to knock themselves out of several playoffs. WVU and ISU may be ok with all that but OU and its fans are fed up, and UT is just biding time. If the conference suddenly decides to try and expand in 2025, the candidates will be nearly 10 years removed from being competitive. Why would they be better then than they are now? What would be different? No schools will be added because UT doesn't want any added. They don't want a conference network. they just want their options open, but will continue to delude whomever wants to be deluded into thinking something could happen down the road. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
ACC a better fit than Big 12?
Top
Bottom