Search
Log in
Register
Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
NIL Deal Tracker
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
College Draft Totals
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Culture
Sports Betting
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Get a profile. Be recruited.
New posts
Menu
Install the app
Install
On3:
Tracking college football’s highest-paid wide receivers
On3:
Nearly 50 years after Herschel Walker's debut, the Georgia-Tennessee rivalry still endures
On3:
QB Ryan Staub emerges at Colorado and what that says about Deion Sanders
On3:
Facing a must-win gauntlet, Florida's Billy Napier doubles down
Iowa:
David Pollack on Iowa: ‘You’re bringing a rock to a gun fight’
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
ACC a better fit than Big 12?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="skygusty_rivals" data-source="post: 129587216" data-attributes="member: 1500287"><p>I am liking more and more the hypothesis that Texas was always mostly pretending to listen to expansion talk with an open mind. They were either going to stand pat with the Big12 as is or they were going to leave for either the Big10 or the SEC all along at the end of the GOR. Expansion with G5 schools was never going to fly with them as the prestige would go down and the money would not go up, and they were never going to let go of the LHN without crazy financial reward. I also think Boren's terms were intentionally impossible as he never really expected the money could be good enough to talk Texas out of the LHN by expanding with G5 schools. It has been for political cover for the most part as I think Oklahoma could very well also have been planning all along to leave for either the SEC or BIG10. He just needed it to be plausible in Oklahoma that he had done everything he could to save and stick with the Big12. This is a far more likely scenario than believing that the BIG12 could start a new network, fold in the LHN, make more money and not lose prestige with the schools available. It is clear that if those two schools want more of both, then they are leaving. If they like being in control of a big conference that could finish a consistent third in the money then there is a chance they will stay with the BIG12. The money for Texas and Oklahoma is going to continue to be really good no matter what they do. Since my secret Buckaineer decoder ring has not arrived, I can't tell which story might be true. Politicians are a slippery lot. I hope it turns out good for WVU, but if those two leave, conference #5 is almost certain to be our new home and a lot more discussion will ensue when THAT happens. </p><p></p><p>Just for the hell of it, Google SEC expansion or BIG10 Expansion. You will find that the fanbases for other schools are no less crazy than we are for the topic and their ideas are just as bizarre as any floated here.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="skygusty_rivals, post: 129587216, member: 1500287"] I am liking more and more the hypothesis that Texas was always mostly pretending to listen to expansion talk with an open mind. They were either going to stand pat with the Big12 as is or they were going to leave for either the Big10 or the SEC all along at the end of the GOR. Expansion with G5 schools was never going to fly with them as the prestige would go down and the money would not go up, and they were never going to let go of the LHN without crazy financial reward. I also think Boren's terms were intentionally impossible as he never really expected the money could be good enough to talk Texas out of the LHN by expanding with G5 schools. It has been for political cover for the most part as I think Oklahoma could very well also have been planning all along to leave for either the SEC or BIG10. He just needed it to be plausible in Oklahoma that he had done everything he could to save and stick with the Big12. This is a far more likely scenario than believing that the BIG12 could start a new network, fold in the LHN, make more money and not lose prestige with the schools available. It is clear that if those two schools want more of both, then they are leaving. If they like being in control of a big conference that could finish a consistent third in the money then there is a chance they will stay with the BIG12. The money for Texas and Oklahoma is going to continue to be really good no matter what they do. Since my secret Buckaineer decoder ring has not arrived, I can't tell which story might be true. Politicians are a slippery lot. I hope it turns out good for WVU, but if those two leave, conference #5 is almost certain to be our new home and a lot more discussion will ensue when THAT happens. Just for the hell of it, Google SEC expansion or BIG10 Expansion. You will find that the fanbases for other schools are no less crazy than we are for the topic and their ideas are just as bizarre as any floated here. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
ACC a better fit than Big 12?
Top
Bottom