Search
Log in
Register
Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
NIL Deal Tracker
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
College Draft Totals
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Culture
Sports Betting
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Get a profile. Be recruited.
New posts
Menu
Install the app
Install
On3:
College Football Bowl Projections Week 3: Full list of matchups, playoff predictions
On3:
Brent Venables' OU overhaul produces big win over Michigan, but what comes next is most important
On3:
Florida's mistakes against USF weren't 'uncharacteristic,' they were emblematic of the Billy Napier era
On3:
College Football Playoff Prediction: Welcome to Oklahoma, Iowa State and USF
On3:
AP Poll Top 25: College Football Rankings see shake up after Week 2
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
ACC Network?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="topdecktiger" data-source="post: 129600333" data-attributes="member: 1459051"><p>I'm not lying about a damn thing. You said all this stuff, and now you don't want to admit you were wrong. You said:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You were dead wrong here. The ACC is getting a cable channel, just like the SEC and Big Ten.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah, you were all over the ACC getting a network. Right.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is another thing. This if from Sports Business Daily, and you quoted them extensively, so you can't say they're wrong.<a href="http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Daily/Morning-Buzz/2016/07/19/ESPN-ACC.aspx"> ACC games that appear on ESPN3 will move to the digital ACC Network Plus</a>. Remember how you swore up and down ESPN wasn't paying for content they already own? Well, ESPN already owned the content that's being switched from ESPN3 to the network. So, that blows your theory to hell. Of course, as I told you, the payment from the network is not for content, but for subscribers, so ESPN isn't paying twice for it.</p><p></p><p>That leads to the point you made about Raycom. Where do you think the 40 games are coming from? The ACC has a total of 112 games. A few of those are OOC road games, so let's say that ends up being around 100 home games. 35 of the games go to Raycom, so that leaves ~65 games. Take out the 40 for the network, and that leaves ~15 games for the rest of ESPN's platforms. So is that what they're doing? ESPN is only going to have 15 games? You told me yourself the ACC wouldn't get a network unless they got back the rights from Raycom. Well, the ACC has a network, so what's the conclusion?</p><p></p><p>By the way, you are overlooking the fact that Raycom also owned the ACC's digital rights. The ACC's digital network starts next month. Well, that means ESPN has to have bought back the digital rights from Raycom. But I know, since there wasn't a press release about it, it couldn't have happened. Never mind all the legal implications. Because it wasn't mentioned in a press release, it obviously couldn't have happened.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="topdecktiger, post: 129600333, member: 1459051"] I'm not lying about a damn thing. You said all this stuff, and now you don't want to admit you were wrong. You said: You were dead wrong here. The ACC is getting a cable channel, just like the SEC and Big Ten. Yeah, you were all over the ACC getting a network. Right. This is another thing. This if from Sports Business Daily, and you quoted them extensively, so you can't say they're wrong.[URL='http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Daily/Morning-Buzz/2016/07/19/ESPN-ACC.aspx'] ACC games that appear on ESPN3 will move to the digital ACC Network Plus[/URL]. Remember how you swore up and down ESPN wasn't paying for content they already own? Well, ESPN already owned the content that's being switched from ESPN3 to the network. So, that blows your theory to hell. Of course, as I told you, the payment from the network is not for content, but for subscribers, so ESPN isn't paying twice for it. That leads to the point you made about Raycom. Where do you think the 40 games are coming from? The ACC has a total of 112 games. A few of those are OOC road games, so let's say that ends up being around 100 home games. 35 of the games go to Raycom, so that leaves ~65 games. Take out the 40 for the network, and that leaves ~15 games for the rest of ESPN's platforms. So is that what they're doing? ESPN is only going to have 15 games? You told me yourself the ACC wouldn't get a network unless they got back the rights from Raycom. Well, the ACC has a network, so what's the conclusion? By the way, you are overlooking the fact that Raycom also owned the ACC's digital rights. The ACC's digital network starts next month. Well, that means ESPN has to have bought back the digital rights from Raycom. But I know, since there wasn't a press release about it, it couldn't have happened. Never mind all the legal implications. Because it wasn't mentioned in a press release, it obviously couldn't have happened. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
ACC Network?
Top
Bottom