Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
College Draft Totals
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Sports Predictions
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Log in
Register
Toggle sidebar
Teams
New
Preseason AP Poll
High School Football Rankings
CFB Player Rankings
Rivals300
Team Recruiting Rankings
Search
New posts
Toggle sidebar
Menu
Install the app
Install
The best thing about every Top 10 team in the newly released AP Poll
Fall camp QB competitions: Where things stand at Florida, Iowa, Tennessee & more
College Football Rankings: Preseason AP Poll Top 25 released
Urban Meyer calls USC-Oregon 'Rubicon' game for Trojans, Lincoln Riley: 'If they lose that game, you watch'
NFL Draft analyst Todd McShay ranks top-10 players for 2026 college football season
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
ACC Network?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="topdecktiger" data-source="post: 129603864" data-attributes="member: 1459051"><p>No, I'm not mistaken at all. See, now this is not theoretical anymore. It's already happened, so you can't keep arguing when the actual outcome has proven you wrong.</p><p></p><p>I'll tell you this until you get it through your thick head. ESPN is not paying twice for rights. The ACC will get paid with profits from the network, exactly like you just mentioned happens with the SEC. Profits from the network are not fees for rights. Rights fees and profits from subscription fees are completely different.</p><p></p><p>Here is what you don't get. The ACC and SEC have exactly the same amount of inventory. Each conference has 14 schools, which is a total of 112 football games per year. (CBS owns a few of the SEC's games, plus a few games are OOC road games for each conference, but that doesn't matter for this comparison purposes.) ESPN owns all the ACC's rights, so that 112 total games, so that's 112 games of total inventory ESPN has available. (Again, not counting some road OOC games.) The point is, the SEC's expansion didn't give them any more inventory than the ACC has. Both leagues have the exact number of games. In fact, the ACC actually has a few extra games for their network, because of the SEC's deal with CBS.</p><p></p><p>Now this gets to the point that you keep dodging, and you dodge it because it completely undermines your argument. Since ESPN owns <strong><em><u>all</u></em></strong> the ACC's rights, there is nothing for ESPN to put on the network that won't result in the ACC being "paid twice." Even the Raycom games are owned by ESPN, not the ACC. So by your logic, the ACC can't get paid, since ESPN already owns all of the games. Well, obviously that's not true. The ACC <strong><em><u>is</u></em></strong> going to get paid. That money has to come from somewhere. That somewhere is the subscription fees. Again, no matter how much you argue against it, subscription fees and rights fees are not the same thing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="topdecktiger, post: 129603864, member: 1459051"] No, I'm not mistaken at all. See, now this is not theoretical anymore. It's already happened, so you can't keep arguing when the actual outcome has proven you wrong. I'll tell you this until you get it through your thick head. ESPN is not paying twice for rights. The ACC will get paid with profits from the network, exactly like you just mentioned happens with the SEC. Profits from the network are not fees for rights. Rights fees and profits from subscription fees are completely different. Here is what you don't get. The ACC and SEC have exactly the same amount of inventory. Each conference has 14 schools, which is a total of 112 football games per year. (CBS owns a few of the SEC's games, plus a few games are OOC road games for each conference, but that doesn't matter for this comparison purposes.) ESPN owns all the ACC's rights, so that 112 total games, so that's 112 games of total inventory ESPN has available. (Again, not counting some road OOC games.) The point is, the SEC's expansion didn't give them any more inventory than the ACC has. Both leagues have the exact number of games. In fact, the ACC actually has a few extra games for their network, because of the SEC's deal with CBS. Now this gets to the point that you keep dodging, and you dodge it because it completely undermines your argument. Since ESPN owns [B][I][U]all[/U][/I][/B] the ACC's rights, there is nothing for ESPN to put on the network that won't result in the ACC being "paid twice." Even the Raycom games are owned by ESPN, not the ACC. So by your logic, the ACC can't get paid, since ESPN already owns all of the games. Well, obviously that's not true. The ACC [B][I][U]is[/U][/I][/B] going to get paid. That money has to come from somewhere. That somewhere is the subscription fees. Again, no matter how much you argue against it, subscription fees and rights fees are not the same thing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
×
Disable Video Player
On3
Latest
01
On3
The best thing about every Top 10 team in the newly released AP Poll
02
On3
Fall camp QB competitions: Where things stand at Florida, Iowa, Tennessee & more
03
On3
College Football Rankings: Preseason AP Poll Top 25 released
04
On3
Urban Meyer calls USC-Oregon 'Rubicon' game for Trojans, Lincoln Riley: 'If they lose that game, you watch'
05
On3
NFL Draft analyst Todd McShay ranks top-10 players for 2026 college football season
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
ACC Network?
Top
Bottom