Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
NIL Deal Tracker
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
College Draft Totals
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Culture
Sports Betting
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Log in
Register
Message Boards
Rivals300
Recruiting Board
NIL Valuation
Transfer Portal
Andy & Ari On3
New posts
Menu
Install the app
Install
5 storylines to track at Big Ten Media Days: Michigan punishment, playoff format debate, Julian Sayin & more
Heisman Trophy Dark Horses: Under-the-radar candidates for 2025
Lincoln Riley reflects on Mike Leach’s College Football Hall of Fame eligibility
Dabo Swinney breaks down what led Clemson to hire Mike Houston
Ranking the Top 10 defenses in College Football ahead of 2025 season
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
ACC teams leaving per source
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="op2" data-source="post: 132083364" data-attributes="member: 419450"><p>I see the reasoning about how so few schools will have so much power but it makes me wonder what incentive the large chunk of schools left out have to play ball (figuratively speaking, and maybe literally too) with the power schools with regards to anything. If so few make so much money then not only are they the only ones with a chance to win at the big sports that lots of people like, but they'll be the only ones with a chance to win at the smaller sports too since their money will spill over into that. What's the point of that big chunk of schools even having college sports?</p><p></p><p>Or here's another angle that perhaps only applies to publicly funded schools. These are supposed to be publicly funded educational entities. As they effectively become more and more like pro sports entities, at what point do they violate their charter or the rules or whatever and no longer become eligible for the public to give them money for education? And they're using big chunks of publicly owned land in the process.</p><p></p><p>And how about accreditation? As "student-athletes," or whatever you wish to call them, get paid more and more and it becomes less and less likely these kids are real students, at what point does accreditation entities say, prove to use these "students" are actually students or lose your accreditation. Or maybe the schools will take the pre-emptive step of disconnecting athletics from academics and just become sponsors of sports teams.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="op2, post: 132083364, member: 419450"] I see the reasoning about how so few schools will have so much power but it makes me wonder what incentive the large chunk of schools left out have to play ball (figuratively speaking, and maybe literally too) with the power schools with regards to anything. If so few make so much money then not only are they the only ones with a chance to win at the big sports that lots of people like, but they'll be the only ones with a chance to win at the smaller sports too since their money will spill over into that. What's the point of that big chunk of schools even having college sports? Or here's another angle that perhaps only applies to publicly funded schools. These are supposed to be publicly funded educational entities. As they effectively become more and more like pro sports entities, at what point do they violate their charter or the rules or whatever and no longer become eligible for the public to give them money for education? And they're using big chunks of publicly owned land in the process. And how about accreditation? As "student-athletes," or whatever you wish to call them, get paid more and more and it becomes less and less likely these kids are real students, at what point does accreditation entities say, prove to use these "students" are actually students or lose your accreditation. Or maybe the schools will take the pre-emptive step of disconnecting athletics from academics and just become sponsors of sports teams. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
ACC teams leaving per source
Top
Bottom