Yes. He just needs some guidance. He needs guided right down the hallway of county prison to his cell.
AJ Ferrari in trouble again...
- Thread starter Loyalandtrue2
- Start date
Or picked him up during his "split"
Since he’s already in custody in Nebraska, it would have to be a cage match.
I wonder if he sees the outside of a facility between now and trial or adjudication.
If the accused has to be extradited from another state, I could see how the judge might not want to let him out again. Don’t want to risk that he leaves the state again.
I‘m no lawyer but I know we have a few on this forum.
Edit: Perplexity says he has a strong chance of getting bail, which might be in the range of $10k.
Last edited:
I always thought AJ looked better in orange anyway. He probably thinks so too.
Nice work, Manning.
In Pennsylvania, the inmates wear (or wore) "cocoa browns". Does he have an open issues in PA?
AJ might favor orange, but I think think he's what is known in healthcare call a "code brown".
O
In Pennsylvania, the inmates wear (or wore) "cocoa browns". Does he have an open issues in PA?
AJ might favor orange, but I think think he's what is known in healthcare call a "code brown".
I don’t know about the rest of you guys, but I’d love to see him wrestling with an ankle monitor.
I’ve always felt this should be illegal as it can impede the opponents’ ability to get a TD.
A) that’s funny, right there. Lol.
B) I don’t want to ever see him wrestle again. Assaulted a young lady, nearly got people killed in the accident, doesn’t care for laws and safety of others. Petulant and boorish public behaviors. He has exhausted his privilege of wrestling (arguably before this). Done.
I, of course, actually agree with this. I was just being facetious.
I thought about this, but he's a heavyweight now, so it really doesn't matter if the ankle monitor weighs anything or not. If he were still cutting to 197, that would actually be a problem.
He'd have a real problem if the police handcuffed him to a barbell.
I don't think it matters that he's wrestling 285.
If Google is to be trusted:
"NCAA heavyweight wrestlers cannot wear a belt during weigh-ins. All collegiate wrestlers must weigh in wearing a legal uniform, which is typically their competition singlet."
"Contestants are not allowed to weigh in wearing shoes or ear guards. A belt would also be considered extra clothing and is not permitted."
Ankle monitor is like a baby ankle belt.
So I think it's safe to say a 24/7 ankle monitor would end his season.
Good thing Ferrari moved to HWT. It would have been tough making 197 wearing an ankle bracelet ...
Also he might not get bail as a flight risk, considering he is charge with fleeing a traffic stop.
Really, for a traffic citation, and non-appearance he'll be held when he's a public figure with no place to hide and never hid?
It was a case of mistaken identity, it was his Uncle Carmine and the charge was something something concealed weapon.
It was actually AJ. Charges were dismissed because of insufficient evidence. Yeah.....another d!ck joke. Sue me
Fleeing the seen is a felony, it would of been just a traffic violation if he didn't flee the seen.
If it's a hit and run, that'd be one thing. If he can argue he didn't see or hear the cop car due to excessively deep-tinted windows and a blaring sound system, that'd be another.
How much is Manning regretting going away from his "homegrown" brag last year? And how quickly did he regret it? Was it only with this incident? Or was it sooner?
he'll have a lawyer negotiate a settlement ... pay the fine for speeding, felony dropped, and he won't even set foot in Texas
wtf is wrong with you guys ... jail time, no bail, ankle monitors lol
it's all about the lol!
We need the message board lawyers like tikk to chime in here, but I believe a lot of it depends on the local DA who filed the charge. If he learns anything about AJ's past history, he might decide he needs a good hard lesson and won't settle for an easy plea bargain. I know what I would do if I was the one calling the shots.
From The Athletic today:Making nat'l news ...
Notre Dame's Marcus Freeman faces battery allegation over alleged incident at wrestling match
Notre Dame Fighting Irish football coach Marcus Freeman faced a battery accusation over an alleged incident at his son's high school wrestling match.www.foxnews.com
Irish deny battery allegation against Freeman
Notre Dame has denied that Marcus Freeman made physical contact with anyone after the football coach was accused of battery in a police report filed Jan. 3.www.espn.com
“After reviewing the Mishawaka Police Department’s investigation into this incident, the Prosecutor’s Office has determined that no criminal battery occurred,” the prosecutor’s office said in a statement. “As such, no criminal charges will be filed against Mr. Freeman.”
During its investigation, which included viewing video surveillance of the wrestling meets, prosecutors determined there was physical contact between Freeman and Fleeger but did not deem it to be intentional, nor did it match Fleeger’s accounting of the incident.
Fleeger told officers that Freeman gave him a “two-handed push” without motivation and did not know the identity of Notre Dame’s head coach at the time of the incident. But in follow-up interviews, Fleeger said he did recognize Freeman, noting that the Notre Dame head coach was “rich” and that Fleeger planned to hire an attorney.
The Mishawaka police interviewed two acquaintances of Fleeger, and each described the incident with Freeman differently. One said Freeman struck Fleeger with an open hand. Another said Freeman struck Fleeger with enough force to send Fleeger backwards. The prosecutor’s office said video of the incident did not support either claim.
Investigators also interviewed Freeman, who acknowledged knowing Fleeger. Freeman said he told Fleeger to stop talking to his son and other wrestlers and that he did not remember making any physical contact.
“Based on a review of all of the evidence, the State would not be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a crime occurred,” the prosecutor’s office said. “While the evidence suggests that a touching may have occurred, an inadvertent touching is not sufficient. The State is therefore declining to file any criminal charges.”
Sounds like Fleeger was just trying to cash in. Pretty petty stuff. Gives wrestling a bad name.
So too will AJs indescretions get dealt with pretty painlessly.
There are a lot of serious criminals running around it there with many serious felonies who don't go to prison. AJ will pay some fines, plea down an offense, or othereise have these traffic infractions dissapeared.
On the good side, from a pure voyieristic entertainment point of view, his next bad decision is just a microphone or a few days/weeks/months away. Let's just hope he doesn't wrap his car around a pedestrian in doing so.
There are a lot of serious criminals running around it there with many serious felonies who don't go to prison. AJ will pay some fines, plea down an offense, or othereise have these traffic infractions dissapeared.
On the good side, from a pure voyieristic entertainment point of view, his next bad decision is just a microphone or a few days/weeks/months away. Let's just hope he doesn't wrap his car around a pedestrian in doing so.
Why was Fleeger running his mouth at a kid anyway.
There are some on intermat who say they have experience with him and they think he is a tool.
"Sounds like Fleeger was just trying to cash in. Pretty petty stuff. Gives wrestling a bad name."
As a retired LEO it was always irritating to have to take a crime report in cases like this because the "victim" insisted on it when you knew it was a waste of everyone's time. The only time we were allowed, per policy, to refuse to take a report was when the allegation, by definition, was not a crime. If the reporting party claimed to be a victim of a criminal act then we were obligated to take a crime report, no matter how ridiculous the allegations. Often times, instead of arguing with the person about taking a report, (and potentially getting a complaint for refusing to take a report per policy) I would just give them their precious "case number" and write the most-basic of reports, letting my narrative spell out that the case wasn't worth anyone's time.
An old salty officer I once knew told my rookie officer self that "there is no report you can't "K" with a pen." A "K" was a call disposition that no report was required. His point was that if someone demanded a report then the easiest thing to do to avoid a complaint or argument was to put something down officially on paper. By writing a bare bones report you avoided an argument and/or complaint and you met your obligations per policy.
Sorry for the detoured response, but sometimes the old police memories come creeping back in : ). Even after almost six years of retirement I still find myself having police dreams, and they are never dreams that you wake up from thinking, "I sure miss my patrol days!"
It certainly seemed like this was one of those given the speed it was dealt with. And details like the "witnesses" who were friends, gave conflicting accounts. Or Fleeger both claiming not to know who Freeman was and to know he was rich. I could feel the police rolling their eyes as they wrote it.
You need to watch Facebook reels, tons of traffic cop content. It’s addictive.
Did they find any pink objects?