Capn....I honestly don't see where I was trash talking. Just compared the stats, as they appeared on IHSA and pointed out I thought one set of stats was better than the other. If they were wrong....well, not surprising given that it's the IHSA. I will just end saying Matt Perez probably had the most successful career in Illinois high school football history when you combine the personal accolades and team accomplishments. Brodner (only 1 championship, not named All-American) is half a step behind. Which is not a bad place to be.
My issue isn't with the fact that Perez needs to be on the field. On your team, Bones and 95% of the folks on this board, he is on the field.
You just zero'd in on Brodner and used flawed stats to prove Brodner was somehow less of a back.
I just watched the 2008 MS title game and part of the 2009 game and MS had an amazing offense led by stud QBs that could run, hard, and throw the ball (3,500+ yards (wow what an amazing team!)). Perez does look like a great running back and I can imagine those that saw him play are passionate about supporting him.
There really isn't a comparison between MS and the offenses run by GW and GN showcasing a Brodner and Jackson. Those offenses basically tell you where the ball is going within a split second of the snap and sometimes before the snap. Both those guys drew everyone's focus every play.
I have said on this board that I never understood how Jackson gained so many yards out of the Power I. He ran the ball 40 times a game for an average of 250 yards. Do I discount him because he
only averaged 6 yards a carry? Or do I remain astonished that the guy was man enough to carry the ball 40 times and STILL gain 250 yards when EVERYONE knew he was getting the ball?
Oh, and then he has to go play CB. Just crazy what that dude accomplished in his years at GN.