Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Buckaineer" data-source="post: 131759908" data-attributes="member: 1428007">The BIG 12 per industry experts was in line to receive 45-65% increases.The conference was going to be at $45 mil per school when the contracts expired.The SEC was at around $43 million per school when their new deal of About $20 mil additional per school to start in 2025 was announced.&nbsp; That's $63 million per school.But that was for 15 games--the ENTIRE BIG 12 inventory was up for grabs and if they got even just a 45% increase from $45 million that would have been an additional $20.25 million per school or $65.25 million per school.So yes, UT and OU could have been right in line with&nbsp; SEC payouts.And as for expansion--had they added i.e Cincinnati, Memphis, UCF and another they would have grown the territory large enough to create a network.But instead Texas and later on OU as well played everyone--and then left anyway.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Buckaineer, post: 131759908, member: 1428007"] The BIG 12 per industry experts was in line to receive 45-65% increases. The conference was going to be at $45 mil per school when the contracts expired. The SEC was at around $43 million per school when their new deal of About $20 mil additional per school to start in 2025 was announced. That's $63 million per school. But that was for 15 games--the ENTIRE BIG 12 inventory was up for grabs and if they got even just a 45% increase from $45 million that would have been an additional $20.25 million per school or $65.25 million per school. So yes, UT and OU could have been right in line with SEC payouts. And as for expansion--had they added i.e Cincinnati, Memphis, UCF and another they would have grown the territory large enough to create a network. But instead Texas and later on OU as well played everyone--and then left anyway. [/QUOTE]

Name