His question to Stans was, "How can you guys expand this lead in the second half?" That isn't a leading question, that isn't a dick question to ask, that is a normal halftime question. If we were losing it would have been, "What can you guys do to cut into this lead they have in the second half?" The problem was Stans answer. "I'd be happy to just keep this lead." Really? That explains why if we have more than a 5 point lead with 5 minutes left, we constantly hold the ball to the end of the shot clock and throw up a 3. And while I'm happy we won, he still is a terrible coach. We made shots last night which covers up the glaring issues we have at head coach. We played with more effort, which I can commend him for, but our offense only looked decent because we were making 3's. I hope this team does live up to its potential, but I'm not willing to believe it just yet.<div>
</div><div>As for the questions for Dee, I have to agree with someone else who said it just came off as Dee is terrible at interviews. "How has having Sidney back in the line up help? We just gotta work hard and take it a game at a time." Just seemed like either a really bad answer, or just avoiding the question. And yes, those things happened last year, but they all deal with players that are currently on our team. I mean I'm not a Katz fan really, but nothing he did last night or said about our team was out of line. And honestly, you think "the national media is craving for this team to fail". The national media cares very very little about MSU basketball. And why should they? For the past decade we have been a mediocre team in a mediocre basketball conference.</div>