Ann Coulter: Immigrant of the Week: Henry Bello (Obotetukudo)

WVU82_rivals

Senior
May 29, 2001
199,095
686
0
Last Friday, Nigerian immigrant Henry Williams Obotetukudo, aka Henry Bello, opened fire with an AM-15 rifle at the Bronx-Lebanon Hospital, killing one doctor and injuring a half-dozen others. I would prefer to leap right in and offer my ideas for stopping these immigrant shooting rampages, but first I’ll have to tell you the facts the media won’t.

The New York Times, still unaware there’s an internet, is trying to pass off the Nigerian as a Californian, the non-doctor as a doctor, and Mr. Obotetukudo as “Dr. Bello.”

In the Times’ major biographical profile of Bello the next day, he was described as a “sharp dresser from California.” The only other reference to the shooter’s provenance came several paragraphs later: “Dr. Bello lived in California off and on from 1991 until 2006.”


ABC News had reported on the day of the shooting that Bello was a “Nigerian national” — so the cat was already out of the bag, New York Times. Local New York station PIX11 also reported that he was a Nigerian. Even newspapers in Ohio knew that Bello was a Nigerian.

But as we go to print, the Times still has not identified Bello as a Nigerian immigrant. It issued a “correction,” but only to clarify the exact street of a homeless shelter where Bello had lived. No correction to the “California” bit.

Sadly, the Times didn’t allow any comments to the online version of its story, but CBS did. There were four comments, two about the incident (“rot in hell”) and two about CBS’s report:

“Where was Bello born?”

and:

“Where is he from? Where did he receive his medical degree? Worthless reporting.”

You’re not fooling anyone, media.

Having misled readers about Bello’s nationality, the Times professed utter bafflement about the shooter’s motive, saying it was “marked with as many questions as answers.”

If the Times simply reported facts, instead of strategically constructing news stories to protect favored groups, it might have noticed that there have been a LOT of mass shootings by certain types of immigrants.

There are mental illness shootings, gangland shootings, still-angry-about-the-divorce shootings and so on. Some immigrant murderers are mentally ill or criminals — thanks to our excellent and extremely rigorous vetting system! But there are enough like Mr. Obotetukudo to qualify as their own category: the Disappointed Immigrant mass shootings.

The usual elements are: 1) immigrants from wildly different cultures, who have 2) unrealistic expectations about what their lives should be like in the U.S., combined with 3) an inability to achieve success in the U.S., and 4) a failure to grasp our customs — often, even our language, typically marked by 5) a particular rage at women.

The same way girls from the Midwest come to New York City expecting to live like Carrie Bradshaw in Sex and the City (she was paying $700 a month for a $2,700 per month apartment, plus $40,000 on shoes), some immigrants seem to expect their lives in the U.S. to be like something out of Dynasty.

Bello, for example, declared bankruptcy in 2000 — from one of the priciest towns in the world, Santa Barbara, California. And he just kept failing. He was fired from the Bronx hospital. He lost his license as a “pharmacy technician.” (He was not a “doctor,” despite the media’s insistent reference to him as one.)

The Nigerian couldn’t even pull off being a fake doctor, sounding more like a character out of a comedy sketch. Co-workers described him as “very aggressive, talking loudly, threatening people.” Once he was arrested for fare-jumping — just like your trusted family physician. Recently, he’d been living in a homeless shelter.

His Third World approach to meeting women resulted in his being arrested in 2004 for lifting a 23-year-old woman off the ground in Greenwich Village, while trying to penetrate her through her underwear and saying “You’re coming with me.” Although initially charged with felony assault, he pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor — otherwise he might have been deported and America’s beautiful mosaic would be diminished.

Apart from the turnstile jumping, all of Bello’s arrests involve similarly rom-com, meet-cute scenarios. In 2003, he was arrested for kicking in an ex-girlfriend’s door at 5:10 in the morning. In 2009, he was charged, in separate incidents, with harassing women by trying to look up their skirts.

All this insanely inappropriate behavior would have continued ad infinitum, with American women being sacrificed on the altar of multiculturalism, but, finally, the Unstoppable Force of Diversity met the Feminist Immovable Object: He was fired from the hospital for sexual harassment.

In his revenge shooting, he killed one doctor: a woman.

Bello blamed his firing on “racism and discrimination,” so at least he was capable of assimilating to the American custom of immigrants being constantly aggrieved.

Close observers will notice the same basic pattern over and over again. Immigrants from backward cultures develop extravagant expectations about their lives in America, fail to master the most rudimentary civic habits, and then erupt in shooting rampages when their lives aren’t turning out as planned.

One will find similar elements in the many, many immigrant mass murders — Jiverly Wong (American Civic Association, Binghamton, New York); Nigerian immigrant Peter Odighizuwa (Appalachian School of Law); Palestinian immigrant Ali Hassan Abu Kamal (Empire State Building); Bosnian immigrant Sulejman Talovic (Trolley Square Mall, Salt Lake City); Hmong immigrant Chai Soua Vang (hunters in Wisconsin); Mexican immigrant Salvador Tapia (Windy City Core Supply); Korean immigrant Seung-Hui Cho (Virginia Poly Tech); and on and on.

Liberals have a mystical idea that we can pluck people from the most discordant cultures, put them in middle-class houses in the suburbs and then, magically, primitive tribesmen will be imbued with the core beliefs of our republic and civilization, developed over centuries.

Instead, we have Aztecs getting loaded up on Tecate and hopping behind the wheels of cars; Nigerians demanding to be called “doctor” while picking up women on the street and trying to drag them home; and Hmong responding to the concept of private property by wiping out a pack of Wisconsin hunters.

The New York Times might even help their Muslim friends by reporting the truth! Perhaps some Muslim mass murders — Fort Hood, the Boston Marathon, and the Orlando nightclub, for example –- aren’t problems of Islam, at all. Maybe the problem is assimilation.

It would be a major step forward if the media would just stop lying to us. Until then, Times reporters can still be issued badges, but they shouldn’t be press badges.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
46,692
1,764
113
Those damn immigrants never do anything good for our nation do they? Never did either.
The ones cited in the article? No. Historically? Yes.

Now continue pretending the immigrant influx of the 19th and 20th centuries by people of similar values is comparable to today.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
The ones cited in the article? No. Historically? Yes.

Now continue pretending the immigrant influx of the 19th and 20th centuries by people of similar values is comparable to today.
Immigration is immigration. Are you honestly trying to say that an immigrant from a certain area of the Earth, a certain nation, or a certain religious background cannot become good Americans? They can't contribute positive things to our nation?

I want the US to continue to be the haven we've always been. Nationalist, isolationist rhetoric like this from AC is unAmerican in my opinion. Vetting? Sure, of course. Even some level of Trump's "extreme vetting" process (which is so very specific and informative, btw) would be acceptable for me. But not accepting refugees or those seeking freedom in all its forms? It's just not who we are.

One of the worst things FDR did during his Presidency was not allow Jewish refugees admittance in favor of isolationism. I understand the terrorism element, I do, but they seek to change us.....and I like who we are. It's like when people tell me not to be a good friend to people, because they will take advantage of me. I believe in being real, and changing who I am only takes away a positive. Stubborn, but not dumb.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
46,692
1,764
113
Immigration is immigration. Are you honestly trying to say that an immigrant from a certain area of the Earth, a certain nation, or a certain religious background cannot become good Americans? They can't contribute positive things to our nation?

I want the US to continue to be the haven we've always been. Nationalist, isolationist rhetoric like this from AC is unAmerican in my opinion. Vetting? Sure, of course. Even some level of Trump's "extreme vetting" process (which is so very specific and informative, btw) would be acceptable for me. But not accepting refugees or those seeking freedom in all its forms? It's just not who we are.

One of the worst things FDR did during his Presidency was not allow Jewish refugees admittance in favor of isolationism. I understand the terrorism element, I do, but they seek to change us.....and I like who we are. It's like when people tell me not to be a good friend to people, because they will take advantage of me. I believe in being real, and changing who I am only takes away a positive. Stubborn, but not dumb.
I don't agree with Ann's position, but I don't agree with yours either. I believe in assimilation. Assimilation is not bringing that 3rd world ******** to us and forcing us to accept their beliefs. That **** should be called out and condemned at every opportunity by the masses.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
I don't agree with Ann's position, but I don't agree with yours either. I believe in assimilation. Assimilation is not bringing that 3rd world ******** to us and forcing us to accept their beliefs. That **** should be called out and condemned at every opportunity by the masses.
Ok. If you're talking about immigrants assimilating to our Constitution? Of course, anyone who doesn't expect that is just a fool. If you're talking about assimilation to our social norms? Nah....norms should change. Religious freedom is fine, but NEVER above the Constitution (no matter the religion). If you're talking about assimilation of language or family rules? As long as it complies with our Constitution, it's not any of my or your business how a family conducts themselves.

This assimilation bs is just another talking point. Any crazy that wants to allow enclaves of immigrants living outside of the Constitution and federal, state, and city law, are NOT LIBERALS they're just crazies. When I see a woman walking paces behind their husband, I want to run up to her and scream that she's an American now and she doesn't have to walk behind ANYONE if she so chooses. But I remember, I'm an American, and it's her choice.....not mine.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
46,692
1,764
113
When I see a woman walking paces behind their husband, I want to run up to her and scream that she's an American now and she doesn't have to walk behind ANYONE if she so chooses. But I remember, I'm an American, and it's her choice.....not mine.
I disagree that that is an example of being an American. You should involve yourself to educate them into our societal norms, and I disagree that we should be tolerant of that kind of thing. That's the kind of backwards ******** that I'm talking about, because it carries over to workplace as well. My wife has encountered quite of few instances where a client has tried to "man handle" her in meetings because it's their "culture". That's the stuff that should be ostracized.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
I disagree that that is an example of being an American. You should involve yourself to educate them into our societal norms, and I disagree that we should be tolerant of that kind of thing. That's the kind of backwards ******** that I'm talking about, because it carries over to workplace as well. My wife has encountered quite of few instances where a client has tried to "man handle" her in meetings because it's their "culture". That's the stuff that should be ostracized.
Sure, I agree. By saying social norms should change, I'm not advocating that all norms brought to the us by immigrants should be accepted. I'm just saying that immigrants shouldn't feel forced to give up their norms fully either, because social norms should change. I believe women have been "manhandled" in business meetings here in the US for a long time without the influence of immigrant social norms. Despite our greatness, there are many things we can still learn.
 

mneilmont

Sophomore
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
I don't agree with Ann's position, but I don't agree with yours either. I believe in assimilation. Assimilation is not bringing that 3rd world ******** to us and forcing us to accept their beliefs. That **** should be called out and condemned at every opportunity by the masses.
Great revelation.

They should not immigrate to our country to perpetuate their old way of life. They should come seeking a life like us and accept our constitution. If they desire to keep their form of life, stay the *** where you are and be prepared to fight to death to maintain that form. I thought it was understood that we welcome those who come to accept and practice our life style.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
Great revelation.

They should not immigrate to our country to perpetuate their old way of life. They should come seeking a life like us and accept our constitution. If they desire to keep their form of life, stay the *** where you are and be prepared to fight to death to maintain that form. I thought it was understood that we welcome those who come to accept and practice our life style.
I don't think lifestyle should be forced on anyone. Laws? Yes. Our Constitution? Of course. Americans have many different lifestyles, and as long as they abide by the Constitution and do not infringe upon other American's rights....their lifestyle is as righteous as anyone else's, imo.