Another Dem ******* Calls for Violence

bornaneer

Senior
Jan 23, 2014
29,893
542
113
Democratic congressman Kweisi Mfume is calling for a "street fight" at a protest pushing back against Elon Musk’s recent efforts to slash government waste through the newly created DOGE office.

"This will be a congressional fight, a constitutional fight, a legal fight, and a street fight, yes we will stand," Democratic Rep. Kweisi Mfume, who has represented Maryland’s 7th Congressional District since 2020, said at a rally in Baltimore on Monday outside the Social Security Office.
 

roadtrasheer

Junior
Sep 9, 2016
16,609
265
83
Democratic congressman Kweisi Mfume is calling for a "street fight" at a protest pushing back against Elon Musk’s recent efforts to slash government waste through the newly created DOGE office.

"This will be a congressional fight, a constitutional fight, a legal fight, and a street fight, yes we will stand," Democratic Rep. Kweisi Mfume, who has represented Maryland’s 7th Congressional District since 2020, said at a rally in Baltimore on Monday outside the Social Security Office.
Can you imagine if a republican called for street fights ..
 

moe

Sophomore
May 29, 2001
32,474
141
63
Democratic congressman Kweisi Mfume is calling for a "street fight" at a protest pushing back against Elon Musk’s recent efforts to slash government waste through the newly created DOGE office.

"This will be a congressional fight, a constitutional fight, a legal fight, and a street fight, yes we will stand," Democratic Rep. Kweisi Mfume, who has represented Maryland’s 7th Congressional District since 2020, said at a rally in Baltimore on Monday outside the Social Security Office.
lol Quit being a scared *****, K? So when Trump says fight in a speech it doesn't mean actual fight? (it did) but when Dems do it, it means actual fight? (where is the actual fight? there was none) lol got it.
 
Last edited:

roadtrasheer

Junior
Sep 9, 2016
16,609
265
83
lol Quit being a scared *****, K? So when Trump says fight in a speech it doesn't mean actual fight (it did) but when Dems do it, it means actual fight (where is the actual fight? there was none) lol got it.
Lmao ...WTF?
 

ThePunish-EER

Freshman
Aug 19, 2005
13,313
58
0
lol Quit being a scared *****, K? So when Trump says fight in a speech it doesn't mean actual fight? (it did) but when Dems do it, it means actual fight? (where is the actual fight? there was none) lol got it.
Noted and archived for future reference. Next time Democrats call for violence against Republicans and Trump supporters, I’ll remind you of this. K *****? lol
 

bornaneer

Senior
Jan 23, 2014
29,893
542
113
lol Quit being a scared *****, K? So when Trump says fight in a speech it doesn't mean actual fight? (it did) but when Dems do it, it means actual fight? (where is the actual fight? there was none) lol got it.
I got you to flip...you're sooooooooo easy.
 

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
79,607
1,410
113
lol Quit being a scared *****, K? So when Trump says fight in a speech it doesn't mean actual fight? (it did) but when Dems do it, it means actual fight? (where is the actual fight? there was none) lol got it.
Look at @moe ...arguing for waste, fraud, and abuse! See what TDS does to your mind?

@moe
Look, I'm as upset as any other mind numbed Leftist over Trump and his DOGE renegades, but don't mistake my affinity for Government waste and avarice for a good street fight! We can keep all the fraud and abuse that's ripping off taxpayers without having to resort to street violence (that is unless we have to)

That-a-boy @moe , you sure know where your priorities are. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:

ThePunish-EER

Freshman
Aug 19, 2005
13,313
58
0
Look at @moe ...arguing for waste, fraud, and abuse! See what TDS does to your mind?

@moe
Look, I'm as upset with anyone else with Trump and his DOGE renegades, but don't mistake my affinity for Government waste and avarice for a good street fight! We can keep all the fraud and abuse that's ripping off taxpayers without having to resort to street violence ( that is unless we have to)

That-a-boy @moe , you sure know where your priorities are. :rolleyes:
I know, right? lol. Imagine being born with his brain. Kind of sad isn’t it.
 

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
79,607
1,410
113
?? I flipped on nothing. You can't have it both ways.
Who are you kidding @moe ...dude you "flipped" the minute Trump started coming down that Golden escalator! You've been whacked out ever since!

@moe
I can't honestly deny I haven't been the same since Trump showed up. I was totally despondent after that Butler PA shooter missed!

Poor @moe ....expecting the worst and got it really really bad! :joy:
 

Airport

All-Conference
Dec 12, 2001
81,143
1,302
113
lol Quit being a scared *****, K? So when Trump says fight in a speech it doesn't mean actual fight? (it did) but when Dems do it, it means actual fight? (where is the actual fight? there was none) lol got it.
Let's fight in the streets, we outnumber them 6-1
 

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
79,607
1,410
113
Let's fight in the streets, we outnumber them 6-1
They can't/won't fight...look how most of 'em have disappeared from this board? There were no defenders for Biden or the cacklin' Communist, and they've all abandoned @moe (except for @bamaEER ) leaving that poor guy as the sole Leftist TDS infected soldier fighting for "the cause". :joy:

He's totally embarrassing them too, yet no one comes to his defense, not one of 'em!

Just damn.
 

ThePunish-EER

Freshman
Aug 19, 2005
13,313
58
0
They can't/won't fight...look how most of 'em have disappeared from this board? There were no defenders for Biden or the cacklin' Communist, and they've all abandoned @moe (except for @bamaEER ) leaving that poor guy as the sole Leftist TDS infected soldier fighting for "the cause". :joy:

He's totally embarrassing them too, yet no one comes to his defense, not one of 'em!

Just damn.
They’re all likely the same deranged moron posting under several different user names.
 

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
79,607
1,410
113
?? I flipped on nothing. You can't have it both ways.
What about the Female Democrat legislator(from Oregon I believe) who just called on your party's faithful to F*ck Trump? You OK with what she said? 🤔

@moe
I can't tell a lie, that thought has crossed my mind a time or two atl!

You're STILL lying through your teeth @moe ...you've been wanting to F*ck Trump ever since he "colluded" with the Russians to steal Hillary's coronation! :joy:

@moe
Well Trump does stimulate me in ways I could never have imagined atl!

We read your posts @moe , even though you have most of us on "ignore". :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:
 
Last edited:

bornaneer

Senior
Jan 23, 2014
29,893
542
113
?? I flipped on nothing. You can't have it both ways.
You previously repeatedly claimed that Trump "incited" violence....Now you said this about what the Dems are saying about fighting Trump policies; "where is the actual fight? there was none" Your words not mine.

I posted what I did to get your response...And that response was exactly what I expected.
 

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
79,607
1,410
113
You previously repeatedly claimed that Trump "incited" violence....Now you said this about what the Dems are saying about fighting Trump policies; "where is the actual fight? there was none" Your words not mine.

I posted what I did to get your response...And that response was exactly what I expected.
Checkmate! 👌
 

moe

Sophomore
May 29, 2001
32,474
141
63
You previously repeatedly claimed that Trump "incited" violence....Now you said this about what the Dems are saying about fighting Trump policies; "where is the actual fight? there was none" Your words not mine.

I posted what I did to get your response...And that response was exactly what I expected.
Read much? lol When Trump called for a fight, there was a fight. When a Dem said fight, there was no fight but you complained about it. So we learned that when Repubs say fight, they mean violence but when Dems say it, it's just to inspire Dems to resist Trump and MAGA who want to break all the laws and ignore the constitution because they hate democracy and want an autocracy. See all of those court cases? It's good people taking MAGA to court to keep them from breaking all of our laws. Trump should consider following the law and the constitution for a change.
 

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
79,607
1,410
113
Dem calls for "fighting" caused this !!!!!!!!


@moe
Those photos don't count @bornaneer...those were "peaceful" protests!

Well @moe ...if we all weren't sympathetic to your severe affliction with TDS, we'd probably suspect you're a two faced hypocrite chastising Trump over simply calling for us to "fight" while totally ignoring your side actually doing it! :rolleyes:
 

bornaneer

Senior
Jan 23, 2014
29,893
542
113
Read much? lol When Trump called for a fight, there was a fight. When a Dem said fight, there was no fight but you complained about it. So we learned that when Repubs say fight, they mean violence but when Dems say it, it's just to inspire Dems to resist Trump and MAGA who want to break all the laws and ignore the constitution because they hate democracy and want an autocracy. See all of those court cases? It's good people taking MAGA to court to keep them from breaking all of our laws. Trump should consider following the law and the constitution for a change.
Laughable...How did Trump ignore the constitution and what laws,beside the NY sham case,did Trump break.
I did see all the Trump "court cases" that were dismissed. Did you know that Jack Smith gave up because he knew that Trump would prevail ?
 

roadtrasheer

Junior
Sep 9, 2016
16,609
265
83
Laughable...How did Trump ignore the constitution and what laws,beside the NY sham case,did Trump break.
I did see all the Trump "court cases" that were dismissed. Did you know that Jack Smith gave up because he knew that Trump would prevail ?
CNN didn't tell him that.
 

bornaneer

Senior
Jan 23, 2014
29,893
542
113
Read much? lol When Trump called for a fight, there was a fight. When a Dem said fight, there was no fight but you complained about it. So we learned that when Repubs say fight, they mean violence but when Dems say it, it's just to inspire Dems to resist Trump and MAGA who want to break all the laws and ignore the constitution because they hate democracy and want an autocracy. See all of those court cases? It's good people taking MAGA to court to keep them from breaking all of our laws. Trump should consider following the law and the constitution for a change.
Moe...here is a fact...You Dems call for "fighting" Trump and Trump survived TWO assassination attempts...almost had his head blown off by one inch.
You NEVER said a ***** word about the nuts the tried to kill him.
 
Last edited:

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
79,607
1,410
113
Moe...here is a fact...You Dems call for "fighting" Trump and Trump survived TWO assassination attempts...missed had his head blown off by one inch.
You NEVER said a ***** word about the nuts the tried to kill him.
If @moe wasn't such a liar, he'd admit he was disappointed that 1st TDS infected shooter missed! :rolleyes: We actually had one TDS infected poster on here regretting the guy missed! (wish I could find that post) However you all read the same thing I did.

Wackos.

*edit I think it was @sammyk ...I'd go look for it, but it would just anger me again as much as it did when that nincompoop said it. Good Lord! :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:

moe

Sophomore
May 29, 2001
32,474
141
63
Laughable...How did Trump ignore the constitution and what laws,beside the NY sham case,did Trump break.
I did see all the Trump "court cases" that were dismissed. Did you know that Jack Smith gave up because he knew that Trump would prevail ?

White House officials bristle as the courts throttle parts of Trump's agenda

Do you read anything other than MAGA disinformation? Your Jack Smith statement is total nonsense.

Special counsel Jack Smith says evidence against Trump was enough to convict him
Special counsel Jack Smith moves to drop both federal criminal cases against Trump

Special counsel Jack Smith on Monday dropped one of his criminal cases against President-elect Donald Trump and was on the verge of dropping the other — a termination that is required, Smith said, by Justice Department policy that bars continuing the prosecutions once Trump is inaugurated.
The report says the evidence would have led to Trump’s conviction at trial, “but for Mr. Trump’s election and imminent return to the Presidency.” Longstanding Justice Department policy prohibits prosecuting a sitting president.

Smith said he fully stood behind the decision to bring the cases: “To have done otherwise on the facts developed during our work would have been to shirk my duties as a prosecutor and a public servant. After nearly 30 years of public service, that is a choice I could not abide.”
 

moe

Sophomore
May 29, 2001
32,474
141
63
Moe...here is a fact...You Dems call for "fighting" Trump and Trump survived TWO assassination attempts...almost had his head blown off by one inch.
You NEVER said a ***** word about the nuts the tried to kill him.
Fight Trump!
 

ThePunish-EER

Freshman
Aug 19, 2005
13,313
58
0
Read much? lol When Trump called for a fight, there was a fight. When a Dem said fight, there was no fight but you complained about it. So we learned that when Repubs say fight, they mean violence but when Dems say it, it's just to inspire Dems to resist Trump and MAGA who want to break all the laws and ignore the constitution because they hate democracy and want an autocracy. See all of those court cases? It's good people taking MAGA to court to keep them from breaking all of our laws. Trump should consider following the law and the constitution for a change.
Speaking of ignoring the constitution, providing aid and comfort to illegals is treason. Who is guilty of that?
 

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
79,607
1,410
113
Speaking of ignoring the constitution, providing aid and comfort to illegals is treason. Who is guilty of that?
What about illegally spying on innocent Americans then lying to the FISA courts in order to justify it?

Silence from "Constitution @moe " 🙄
 

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
79,607
1,410
113
White House officials bristle as the courts throttle parts of Trump's agenda

Do you read anything other than MAGA disinformation? Your Jack Smith statement is total nonsense.

Special counsel Jack Smith says evidence against Trump was enough to convict him
Special counsel Jack Smith moves to drop both federal criminal cases against Trump

Special counsel Jack Smith on Monday dropped one of his criminal cases against President-elect Donald Trump and was on the verge of dropping the other — a termination that is required, Smith said, by Justice Department policy that bars continuing the prosecutions once Trump is inaugurated.
The report says the evidence would have led to Trump’s conviction at trial, “but for Mr. Trump’s election and imminent return to the Presidency.” Longstanding Justice Department policy prohibits prosecuting a sitting president.

Smith said he fully stood behind the decision to bring the cases: “To have done otherwise on the facts developed during our work would have been to shirk my duties as a prosecutor and a public servant. After nearly 30 years of public service, that is a choice I could not abide.”
While you stand behind your "cut & paste" Left wing propaganda I'll lay dollars to doughnuts you can't name what "crime" Trump was alleged to have committed? I'm talking about you citing the exact criminal code he violated?

You can't.

You also failed to mention no former President has ever been charged let alone prosecuted for the manufactured caca Smith and the rest of the Lawfare crowd cooked up in their zeal to try and get rid of Trump.

Name another former President accused of as much as those roaches accused Trump of?

Again. You can't.
 

bornaneer

Senior
Jan 23, 2014
29,893
542
113
White House officials bristle as the courts throttle parts of Trump's agenda

Do you read anything other than MAGA disinformation? Your Jack Smith statement is total nonsense.

Special counsel Jack Smith says evidence against Trump was enough to convict him
Special counsel Jack Smith moves to drop both federal criminal cases against Trump

Special counsel Jack Smith on Monday dropped one of his criminal cases against President-elect Donald Trump and was on the verge of dropping the other — a termination that is required, Smith said, by Justice Department policy that bars continuing the prosecutions once Trump is inaugurated.
The report says the evidence would have led to Trump’s conviction at trial, “but for Mr. Trump’s election and imminent return to the Presidency.” Longstanding Justice Department policy prohibits prosecuting a sitting president.

Smith said he fully stood behind the decision to bring the cases: “To have done otherwise on the facts developed during our work would have been to shirk my duties as a prosecutor and a public servant. After nearly 30 years of public service, that is a choice I could not abide.”
You idiot...Smith had TONS of time to bring Trump to trial BEFORE his inauguration..He chose to not to do it because the majority of legal experts said Smith would lose.
Instead Garland and Smith tried to stop Trumps election by the vote of the American...they lost .
 

bornaneer

Senior
Jan 23, 2014
29,893
542
113
While you stand behind your "cut & paste" Left wing propaganda I'll lay dollars to doughnuts you can't name what "crime" Trump was alleged to have committed? I'm talking about you citing the exact criminal code he violated?

You can't.

You also failed to mention no former President has ever been charged let alone prosecuted for the manufactured caca Smith and the rest of the Lawfare crowd cooked up in their zeal to try and get rid of Trump.

Name another former President accused of as much as those roaches accused Trump of?

Again. You can't.
Moe can't and won't.