I think there is a large range of inaccuracy in many areas.So when the GAO estimates an impact of a bill, are they just guessing?
I think there is a large range of inaccuracy in many areas.So when the GAO estimates an impact of a bill, are they just guessing?
But there are always lines that blur when taking such a literal interpretation of the great doc. I agree, everyone should be allowed their one shot muskets. Outside of that, there is an interpretation of what arms means, and the extent of protection offered by our Constitution. Anti-aircraft weapon systems aren't protected by the constitution, right? So there are indeed lines already drawn.
A one shot musket is your interpretation of what arms meansBut there are always lines that blur when taking such a literal interpretation of the great doc. I agree, everyone should be allowed their one shot muskets. Outside of that, there is an interpretation of what arms means, and the extent of protection offered by our Constitution. Anti-aircraft weapon systems aren't protected by the constitution, right? So there are indeed lines already drawn.
Not to mention that calibers over .50 were widely used back then...but you can't now.
And you can legally purchase AAA if you possess a Class III weapons license. What's your point? By the way, a Class III license comes with the requirement to waive your 4th amendment. Basically, it means that the ATF can come and search your house without due process.But there are always lines that blur when taking such a literal interpretation of the great doc. I agree, everyone should be allowed their one shot muskets. Outside of that, there is an interpretation of what arms means, and the extent of protection offered by our Constitution. Anti-aircraft weapon systems aren't protected by the constitution, right? So there are indeed lines already drawn.
Does he have to...the point is that there were guns like this (and other examples) before and during the 2nd amendment...the concept of a repeating rifle was there so you can't use the argument that it was based on a single shot musket.Have you seen one actually operated?
No, and I wouldn't doubt it if it jammed by round 4, but the concept is obvious. It may work perfectly as far as I know. You don't just fire guns like that. That would be like taking the Wright Bros. plane on a joy ride. Is your question driven by curiosity or do you have point?Have you seen one actually operated?
No, and I wouldn't doubt it if it jammed by round 4, but the concept is obvious. It may work perfectly as far as I know. You don't just fire guns like that. That would be like taking the Wright Bros. plane on a joy ride. Is your question driven by curiosity or do you have point?
And yet handguns account for 90% of shootings. Why are you all focused on "big bad and scary looking guns"?It has the ability to fire a round once about every ten seconds. It is not really a valid argument against making people think there were other big bad and scary looking guns other than muskets.
And yet handguns account for 90% of shootings. Why are you all focused on "big bad and scary looking guns"?
Misleading? Wow, have I been destroyed?I'm not, I was simply countering Priddys misleading post.
Ok Dog. The points you made:And you can legally purchase AAA if you possess a Class III weapons license. What's your point? By the way, a Class III license comes with the requirement to waive your 4th amendment. Basically, it means that the ATF can come and search your house without due process.
The intent of the 2nd as laid out in the Federalist papers was not for personal protection. It was to allow the populace a means to defend against a tyrannical government should the need arise.
Specifically though, you didnt really address a single point I made.
I think being subject to random safety inspection wouldn't be too great an imposition.
But there are always lines that blur when taking such a literal interpretation of the great doc. I agree, everyone should be allowed their one shot muskets. Outside of that, there is an interpretation of what arms means, and the extent of protection offered by our Constitution. Anti-aircraft weapon systems aren't protected by the constitution, right? So there are indeed lines already drawn.
Actually during colonial times I think people had the ability to own their own cannons...not the same as a tank but still pretty lethal I would think...especially if it was loaded with canister shot.Well that didn't take long. Eventually everyone goes to the "Well can you own a tank" argument.
What's an "anti-aircraft" weapon system consist of?
You can own a tank. They make that argument and don't even realize how ridiculous they sound.Well that didn't take long. Eventually everyone goes to the "Well can you own a tank" argument.
What's an "anti-aircraft" weapon system consist of?
How do you feel about Voter ID laws?ut if registered (yes registered = licensed) as a gun owner, I think being subject to random safety inspection wouldn't be too great an imposition.
Question on that - can you get the shells to fire? Always wanted to drive a tank.You can own a tank. They make that argument and don't even realize how ridiculous they sound.
wow...just wow......I have my father's WW2 pistol upstairs....unregistered....am I a scum too....should I turn myself in or just use the unregistered pistol and end it all?Another senseless school shooting and another child dead with one more critical. I thought Trump was going to end this. He promised. I thought a stupid Muslim travel ban on refugees would make America safer. Guess not. Wrong target. Oh, I know. Follow the NRA's line of ******** that you nuts are brainwashed into believing. We need more guns. Hell, put them in schools to protect against grizzlies.
MAGA. You are a bunch of fools voting for anyone that supports the NRA. Period.
Not sure about the sabot rounds but you waive your 4th amendment right to due process. Essentially, if you have the money and go through the process, you can pretty much have anything you want.Question on that - can you get the shells to fire? Always wanted to drive a tank.
Way to add a stupid comment to a legitimate conversation for no purpose whatsoever.wow...just wow......I have my father's WW2 pistol upstairs....unregistered....am I a scum too....should I turn myself in or just use the unregistered pistol and end it all?
What gun do the seals have on those rubber inflatable boats that were used in Act of Valor? I beleive the thing spins when it fires.Not sure about the sabot rounds but you waive your 4th amendment right to due process. Essentially, if you have the money and go through the process, you can pretty much have anything you want.
I knew a guy named Brightwell that owned a railroad caboose that he converted into an apartment on his farm. Chris Kline owns a fully functional maw deuce (M2 .50 cal crew served, tripod mounted, belt Fed, machine gun) that they will take out and chew the hell out of an old VW bug.
You are the governmentThe government has no business coming in my home unless I do something wrong they have determined by legal means.
I'd vote against it the next HOA meetingYou can own a tank. They make that argument and don't even realize how ridiculous they sound.
Peel away all the bs, and I'm thinking you're just a pretty nasty person.Bottom line is bottom line......pussies hate guns. Go sew a quilt nancy boy fahggs.
HOA meeting? Very discriminatory organization. Shouldn't people who come from low income areas be allowed to throw **** all over their yards like they previously did? I mean, you're trying to hold some standards of decency? Better be careful, you might trigger someone.I'd vote against it the next HOA meeting
Yeah, I was against HOAs before buying my current home. Then I discovered, with very little time dedicated to it, I could have remarkable influence on the decisions of the board....I could be ON the board....and it all was in an effort to maintain my homes value, while forcing lazy people in the neighborhood to do things like cut their grass, paint their houses....one home actually had their down spouts disconnected (and where unaware that it was bad for their basement and home).HOA meeting? Very discriminatory organization. Shouldn't people who come from low income areas be allowed to throw **** all over their yards like they previously did? I mean, you're trying to hold some standards of decency? Better be careful, you might trigger someone.
Im sorry snowflake, if I pet your ****** will you like me again?Peel away all the bs, and I'm thinking you're just a pretty nasty person.
Peel away all the bs, and I'm thinking you're just a pretty nasty person.
Not as short as you thankfully. Of course that explains your obsession over me.and short on intelligence.
You basically just listed my reasoning for not caring for unchecked handout programs.Yeah, I was against HOAs before buying my current home. Then I discovered, with very little time dedicated to it, I could have remarkable influence on the decisions of the board....I could be ON the board....and it all was in an effort to maintain my homes value, while forcing lazy people in the neighborhood to do things like cut their grass, paint their houses....one home actually had their down spouts disconnected (and where unaware that it was bad for their basement and home).
People love to ***** and moan, but don't really like to DO anything.......I've discovered.
you call ME stupid after all this drivel you have posted here?....What's happened to you Bru?....did the election results set you off that much?Way to add a stupid comment to a legitimate conversation for no purpose whatsoever.