Toggle sidebar

another nugget from Scooba's research....

C

Coach34

Redshirt
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
in the previous 11 years Stansbury has been the coach, we only have 29 games total vs the other 5 power conferences, going 10-19....we average 2 1/2 games person season against the other big 5 power conferences...wonder if this is about normal? Thats counting postseason games and everything

We can add Depaul and UCLA to that this season, making it 31 in 12 seasons and a 12-19 record...on a positive note, since the sheep say I'm always negative, Stansbury is undefeated against the SWAC
 
C

Coach34

Redshirt
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
in the previous 11 years Stansbury has been the coach, we only have 29 games total vs the other 5 power conferences, going 10-19....we average 2 1/2 games person season against the other big 5 power conferences...wonder if this is about normal? Thats counting postseason games and everything

We can add Depaul and UCLA to that this season, making it 31 in 12 seasons and a 12-19 record...on a positive note, since the sheep say I'm always negative, Stansbury is undefeated against the SWAC
 
C

Coach34

Redshirt
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
in the previous 11 years Stansbury has been the coach, we only have 29 games total vs the other 5 power conferences, going 10-19....we average 2 1/2 games person season against the other big 5 power conferences...wonder if this is about normal? Thats counting postseason games and everything

We can add Depaul and UCLA to that this season, making it 31 in 12 seasons and a 12-19 record...on a positive note, since the sheep say I'm always negative, Stansbury is undefeated against the SWAC
 
R

RonnyAtmosphere

Redshirt
Jun 4, 2007
2,883
0
0
...coach34 is an annoying ******* attention *****.

Take note, coach34: "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." - Mark Twain
 
DawgatAuburn

DawgatAuburn

All-Conference
Apr 25, 2006
10,972
1,726
113

"You can't handle the truth."
 
H

Hanmudog

Redshirt
Apr 30, 2006
5,853
0
0
I think a better question might be what is Stansbury's record versus coaching greats like Brady,Gottfried, Pelphrey, Heath, Gillespie and just about every coach in the SEC the last decade.
 
C

Coach34

Redshirt
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
Hanmudog said:
I think a better question might be what is Stansbury's record versus coaching greats like Brady,Gottfried, Pelphrey, Heath, Gillespie and just about every coach in the SEC the last decade.
Click to expand...

Stansbury's record in conference. Bringing that up time and again is moronic- but I do understand- its the only leg you have to stand on
 
M

MadDawg.sixpack

Redshirt
May 22, 2006
3,358
0
0
I'd try like hell to discount his SEC record seeing as how that accounts for about 70% of his total resume, no matter how inredibly stupid it made me look.
 
A

AssEndDawg

Freshman
Aug 1, 2007
3,183
54
48
we play in the SEC you douchebag! As a conference we don't match up to the "Power Conferences" in basketball. I guess that's why we aren't one of the *%%!#*$ Power Conferences! We aren't like Kansas, putting more money into Basketball than football. That **** wouldn't fly in the SEC.
 
W

whatever.sixpack

Redshirt
Jun 27, 2008
911
0
0
I like having a coach that consistently beats the teams he's supposed to beat and has a winning record in the conference.
How come you don't post the football and baseball records vs power conferences and top 25 teams over the last 10 years?
I'm sure our football record would look abysmal compared to that. Do you think we'd have a 39% winning percentage vs the top 5 conferences in the nation in any other sport if we had to play the top half of their teams (like we do in basketball if most of those teams on the 12-19 list come from NCAA or NIT tourney games)

Can you just not stand winning or something? Do you want MS State to be a doormat in every sport so bad so that you try to drag down the one successful sport we have? Why, so we can all be as miserable and negative as you are?
It's an absolute fact that basketball is by far the most successful sport on our campus over the last 10 years, yet it's the one you try to bring the most negativity to on a daily basis. It's actually the purpose for your life, you live for nothing but that.
 
H

Hanmudog

Redshirt
Apr 30, 2006
5,853
0
0
MSUCostanza said:
exactly is calling Coach34 a **** a stupid thing to say? It's the truth.
Click to expand...

He is a gigantic, festering, tick infested **** who enjoys MSU losing more than winning.
 
D

DowntownDawg

Redshirt
May 28, 2007
3,494
0
0
12-19 against power conferences stacks up against SEC coaches and coaches in other power conferences. Not the SEC record. We've already established that.
 
J

Johnson85

Redshirt
Nov 22, 2009
1,206
0
0
MSUCostanza said:
exactly is calling Coach34 a **** a stupid thing to say? It's the truth.
Click to expand...
It was the other guy you called that that people were taking exception to.
 
M

MSUCostanza

Redshirt
Jan 10, 2007
5,706
0
0
We have some idiots on this board then. I was obviously swearing, then calling C34 a ****. Not calling them both a ****.
 
N

ninja dawg

Redshirt
Dec 30, 2008
82
0
0
whatever said:
I like having a coach that consistently beats the teams he's supposed to beat and has a winning record in the conference.
How come you don't post the football and baseball records vs power conferences and top 25 teams over the last 10 years?
I'm sure our football record would look abysmal compared to that. Do you think we'd have a 39% winning percentage vs the top 5 conferences in the nation in any other sport if we had to play the top half of their teams (like we do in basketball if most of those teams on the 12-19 list come from NCAA or NIT tourney games)

Can you just not stand winning or something? Do you want MS State to be a doormat in every sport so bad so that you try to drag down the one successful sport we have? Why, so we can all be as miserable and negative as you are?
It's an absolute fact that basketball is by far the most successful sport on our campus over the last 10 years, yet it's the one you try to bring the most negativity to on a DAILY BASIS. It's actually the purpose for your life, you live for nothing but that.
Click to expand...
There is not a more true statement....C34, the horse is dead quit beating it. We get that you hate Stans, you dont have to keep reminding us over and over and over......
 
F

fishwater99

Freshman
Jun 4, 2007
14,072
54
48
That is why he is still at MSU. The problem is he can not win OOC games or in the NCAA tourney, where you DO play the other power conferences.
 
missouridawg

missouridawg

Junior
Oct 6, 2009
9,388
287
83
How come you don't post the football and baseball records vs power conferences and top 25 teams over the last 10 years?
Click to expand...
Because John Cohen is about to start his second year and Dan Mullen just finished his first. And needless to say, both of those coaches have shown marked improvement of the on-field product compared with the year before they arrived.

It would be stupid to post John Cohen's one-year SEC record... because he has yet to establish a "track record". Stansbury, on the other hand, has made his marks and we know what to expect. And depending on who you listen to determines what we can "expect" from Stansbury.

Edited to correct spelling mistake(s).
 
M

megadawgmaniac

Redshirt
Sep 15, 2004
746
0
16
Coach34 said:
in the previous 11 years Stansbury has been the coach, we only have 29 games total vs the other 5 power conferences, going 10-19....we average 2 1/2 games person season against the other big 5 power conferences...wonder if this is about normal? Thats counting postseason games and everything

We can add Depaul and UCLA to that this season, making it 31 in 12 seasons and a 12-19 record...on a positive note, since the sheep say I'm always negative, Stansbury is undefeated against the SWAC
Click to expand...
Editor's note: I have no idea what constitutes a "power conference". I do know that they are the BCS conferences, but then aGAIN, they are not. Then there's the whole argument of whether the team from said "power conference" was a good team or not. Here's what I found from schedules I could find online.

<span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">Alabama</span>

2002-03 - <span style="font-weight: bold;">W:</span> Oklahoma, Alabama State, Middle Tennessee State, Ohio State, UNC-Greensboro, St. Bonaventure, Bowling Green, Providence, Morehead State, Xavier (Ohio); <span style="font-weight: bold;">L:</span> Utah, Indiana (NCAAs)

2003-04 - <span style="font-weight: bold;">W:</span> Louisiana Tech, Southeast Louisiana, Charlotte, Austin Peay, Chattanooga, Oregon, Mercer, Wisconsin, NCAAs run: Southern Illinois, Stanford, Syracuse; <span style="font-weight: bold;">L:</span> Pittsburgh, Providence, Xavier (Ohio), Connecticut (NCAAs)

2004-05 - <span style="font-weight: bold;">W:</span> Western Carolina, North Texas, Alaska Anchorage, Minnesota, East Tennessee State, Charlotte, Alabama State, Temple, Tennessee State, Texas A&M-Corpus Christi, New Orleans; <span style="font-weight: bold;">L:</span> Washington, Wisconsin, Wisconsin-Milwaukee (NCAAs)

2005-06 - <span style="font-weight: bold;">W:</span> Miami (Ohio), Alabama State, Louisiana Tech, Winthrop, Georgia State, Jackson State, Birmingham Southern, Marquette (NCAAs); <span style="font-weight: bold;">L:</span> Memphis, Notre Dame, Temple, NC State, Oklahoma, UCLA (NCAAs)

2006-07 - <span style="font-weight: bold;">W:</span> Jackson State, Middle Tennessee State, Iowa, Xavier (Ohio), Texas Southern, Louisiana -Monroe, Tennessee State, Alabama State, Southern Miss, NC State, Coppin State, Lipscomb, Oklahoma; <span style="font-weight: bold;">L:</span> Notre Dame, Massachusetts (NIT)

2007-08 - <span style="font-weight: bold;">W:</span> Troy, Mercer, Southern Miss, Southeast Louisiana, Nicholls State, Wofford, Texas Pan American, Missouri State, Iowa State, George Washington, Chicago State; <span style="font-weight: bold;">L:</span> Belmont, Texas A&M, Georgetown, Clemson

2008-09 - <span style="font-weight: bold;">W:</span> Florida A&M, Chaminade, St. Joseph's, Alabama A&M, Louisiana-Lafayette, Tennessee State, Chattanooga, Yale, Quincy, Georgia Tech; <span style="font-weight: bold;">L:</span> Mercer, Oregon, Texas A&M, Clemson

2009-10 - <span style="font-weight: bold;">W:</span> Jackson State, Providence, Baylor, Michigan, North Florida, Louisiana-Monroe, Samford, Mercer, Tennessee State, Toledo; <span style="font-weight: bold;">L:</span> Cornell, Florida State, Purdue, Kansas State

Let's say 20-21 against power conference teams. 5 out of 7 seasons making the post-season.

<span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">LSU</span>

2000-01 - <span style="font-weight: bold;">W:</span> Houston, Texas Southern, McNeese State, New Orleans, Nicholls State, Wyoming, Centenary; <span style="font-weight: bold;">L:</span> Arizona

2001-02 - <span style="font-weight: bold;">W:</span> Campbell, Southern, Hawaii-Hilo, Mercer, Towson, Northwestern State, UL-Lafayette, McNeese State, Houston, Nicholls State, Iowa (NIT); <span style="font-weight: bold;">L:</span> Weber State, New Orleans, Miami (Fla.), Ball State (NIT)

2002-03 - <span style="font-weight: bold;">W:</span> Nicholls State, South Alabama, Delaware State, McNeese State, Texas A&M-Corpus Christi, Prairie View A&M, Arizona, Tulane, New Orleans, Houston, Centenary; <span style="font-weight: bold;">L:</span> Texas A&M, Purdue (NCAAs)

2003-04 - <span style="font-weight: bold;">W:</span> Southern, McNeese State, Troy State, UL-Monroe, Utah, Southern Miss, Tulane, UAB, Centenary, New Orleans; <span style="font-weight: bold;">L:</span> Houston, Oklahoma (NIT)

2004-05 - <span style="font-weight: bold;">W:</span> Tulane, UL-Lafayette, New Orleans, Northwestern State, McNeese State, Florida State, Ohio State; <span style="font-weight: bold;">L:</span> West Virginia, Southern Miss, Houston, Utah, UAB (NCAAs)

2005-06 - <span style="font-weight: bold;">W:</span> Southern, Nicholls State, West Virginia, McNeese State, New Orleans, UL-Lafayette, Arkansas-Monticello, Tulane, NCAAs run: Iona, Texas A&M, Duke, Texas; <span style="font-weight: bold;">L:</span> Houston, Northern Iowa, Cincinnati, Ohio State, Connecticut, UCLA (NCAAs)

2006-07 - <span style="font-weight: bold;">W:</span> Nicholls State, UL-Monroe, McNeese State, Tulane, Texas A&M, Oregon State, Louisiana Tech, Wright State, Mississippi Valley, Samford, Connecticut; <span style="font-weight: bold;">L:</span> Wichita State, Texas, Washington

2007-08 - <span style="font-weight: bold;">W:</span> Southeastern Louisiana, McNeese State, Chaminade, Nicholls State, Southern, Northwestern State, Oregon State; <span style="font-weight: bold;">L:</span> Oklahoma State, Arizona State, Villanova, Wichita State, Washington, Tulane, Texas A&M

2008-09 - <span style="font-weight: bold;">W:</span> Jackson State, Alcorn State, Northwestern State, Centenary, Troy, Cal State Fullerton, Grambling, Nicholls State, McNeese State, Washington State, UL-Lafayette, Southeastern Louisiana, Butler (NCAAs); <span style="font-weight: bold;">L:</span> Texas A&M, Utah, Xavier (Ohio), North Carolina (NCAAs)

2009-10 - <span style="font-weight: bold;">W:</span> UL-Monroe, Indiana State, Western Kentucky, UL-Lafayette, Northwestern State, Southeastern Louisiana, Nicholls, Rice, McNeese State; <span style="font-weight: bold;">L:</span> Connecticut, Arizona State, Washington State, Xavier (Ohio), Utah

Let's say 13-24. 6-9 making the post-season.

Stansbury is 9 for 11 making the post-season.

AA - cue Styx
 
missouridawg

missouridawg

Junior
Oct 6, 2009
9,388
287
83
Alabama was 25-11 in 2000-01 and 27-7 in 2001-02

What's the reasoning for leaving out those years?

And the Power Conferences are as follows:
SEC
Big 10
Big 12
Big East
ACC
Pac-10

And I would consider teams such as Gonzaga and Memphis noteworthy if played.
 
HD6

HD6

Sophomore
Apr 8, 2003
10,019
108
63
It's all he could find online, like he said. You go find the results and post them.
 
W

whatever.sixpack

Redshirt
Jun 27, 2008
911
0
0
missouridawg said:
How come you don't post the football and baseball records vs power conferences and top 25 teams over the last 10 years?
Click to expand...
Because John Cohen is about to start his second year and Dan Mullen just finished his first. And needless to say, both of those coaches have shown marked improvement of the on-field product compared with the year before they arrived.

It would be stupid to post John Cohen's one-year SEC record... because he has yet to establish a "track record". Stansbury, on the other hand, has made his marks and we know what to expect. And depending on who you listen to determines what we can "expect" from Stansbury.

Edited to correct spelling mistake(s).
Click to expand...
What, so I'm supposed to now think that football and baseball are on more stable ground b/c we hired two new coaches?
I'm not talking about comparing Stans to Cohen or Mullen necessarily, but you can still compare our basketball success in the last 10 years to that of our football and baseball success and come away with the conclusion that baskeball was, is, and will probably still be our most successful sport into the forseeable future.
But you too Missouri are becoming one of those that doesn't appreciate that success compared to other sports, and seems to begrudge the fact that we actually are successful for some reason.

I think some of you guys are only happy when we have a new coach and during his honeymoon period, so you can have your delusions of grandeur and dreams of winning national championships and just feel wooly thinking we might can win w/ the new guy, and that he's building something Once reality hits 3 years down the road, you turn on every coach we have once you realize it isn't going to turn out that way.
I'm sure all you dreamers now think that Cohen and Mullen are 10x the coach that Stans is and that they'll bring more success than he has sustained over a long period of time, but let me tell you, the odds are probably against them duplicating our success in basketball.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom