another solid win...

Coach34

Redshirt
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
we just toyed with them after getting the big lead and it almost bit us in the ***...Ricky needs to get in their *** a little more about that type stuff. Stewart's 3-ball won it. He misses that shot, and I think the momentum they had may have overtaken us. Game we had to have and we got it.

Now its time to beat down the Rebels and their cialis needing head coach...
 

hatfieldms

All-Conference
Feb 20, 2008
8,604
2,138
113
I think we looked pretty bad tonight. To me the most impressive thing was showing enough poise to hold onto the lead and not fold late in the 2nd half when Georgia was charging at us
 

Woof Man Jack

Redshirt
Apr 20, 2006
946
0
0
Georgia isn't an absolutely horrible team. To me, it looked like our players and coaches ran out to a 19 point lead and thought...this **** is going to be easy. No doubt, it should have been over after the first half...maybe these guys learned you can't put it on cruise control with a big lead.
 

karlchilders.sixpack

All-Conference
Jun 5, 2008
19,587
3,695
113
too much youth, but that seems to be the theme of college BB!

No I don't agree to a 100-0 game, but like this we will get sliced up, if we make the NCAA.
 

Croomp

Redshirt
Jun 25, 2008
1,484
0
0
Winnning on the road with as young as a team we have is impressive. Theres still many gaps out there that need to be fixed but we do have a ton of upside with this team. I feel that Stansbury will have them well prepared for Saturday. Should be a real fun game and hopefully we can reel in a few more football recruits on the side.</p>
 

maroonmania

Senior
Feb 23, 2008
11,075
720
113
and then move on to other activities. The rest of the game was essentially us trying to sleep walk our way to a win which we accomplished.
 

BlindDawg

Redshirt
Jan 23, 2007
649
0
16
Your and idiot. The reasons they got back into the game are 1) they stopped turning the ball over so much (16 in the 1st half vs. only 6 in the 2nd half) and 2) after getting big we got a little complacent and put it on cruise control. It had nothing to do with substitution patterns.
 

VinceVega70

Redshirt
Sep 24, 2007
467
0
0
So I guess you want us to have a starting 5 and leave the lesser players on the bench the whole game? If we are going to do anything in the postseason, we'll have to have 8 to 9 players working together. That only happens if the subs get quality minutes in big games. Stans is doing what any good coach would do, he's developing a TEAM that can hopefully go deep into the postseason. So indeed we will need Bailey, Benock, Brian Johnson, Beckham, and maybe even Augustus to do it.
 

AROB44

Junior
Mar 20, 2008
1,385
227
63
Was he even on the bench? Looks as if we might as well give up on him ever getting his head straight. What a shame.
 

Woof Man Jack

Redshirt
Apr 20, 2006
946
0
0
I totally agree with developing a team...but damn. Don't sub four out of five, especially when we're on a roll. Sub two at a time...keep at least a few of the hot players on the floor.
 

msudawg12

Senior
Dec 9, 2008
3,863
622
113
first 10 minutes = great
last 30 = what the bloody 17 was happening and we're lucky as **** we actually made some free throws
 

RBDog82

Redshirt
Sep 14, 2008
246
33
28
I love how Stansbury didn't even know his name at the post-game press conference. I would venture to say most coaches would look at the back of his jersey after he hit is 4th three en route to his fifth.
 

bullysleftnut

Redshirt
May 23, 2006
493
0
0
It was just the random ******* theory kicking in again. He won't have another game like that until next year against us.